Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{726477,
author = {Kosek, Pavel},
article_location = {Praha},
article_number = {1-2},
keywords = {Baroque Czech, development of the Czech language, intensifying/ gradational conjunction,},
issn = {0024-4457},
journal = {Listy filologické},
title = {Stupňovací spojovací prostředky v barokní češtině},
volume = {130},
year = {2007}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 726477
AU - Kosek, Pavel
PY - 2007
TI - Stupňovací spojovací prostředky v barokní češtině
JF - Listy filologické
VL - 130
IS - 1-2
SP - 61-87
EP - 61-87
PB - Filozofický ústav AV ČR
SN - 00244457
KW - Baroque Czech, development of the Czech language, intensifying/ gradational conjunction,
N2 - Analysing selected several baroque texts (mostly from the sphere of fiction), grammar books and dictionaries, I have come to the conclusion that in Baroque Czech some expressions are usually considered intensifying/gradational by the traditional Czech syntactic theories. I/ Conjunctions: 1. simple (ie consisting of only one part; “jednodílné”) ano, ba; anobrž, nýbrž (rarely having the intensifying meaning, mostly adversative); 2. partioned (ie pair of conjunctions which work together to coordinate two items ”různovětné”): netoliko/ nejen(om)/ nercili/ neřkuli(c) – ale/ nýbrž/ anobrž/ alebrž/ než/ ano/ ani (similarly to the Latin pattern non solum/ non tantum/ non modo – sed etiam/ verum etiamthe Czech structure is lexically variable). II/ Modifiers (usually following the conjunctions): 1. adverbial expressions nad to/ nadto, k tomu; 2. expressions containing the feature of quantity/intensity: více/ víceji, spíše, mnohém; 3. Emphasizing particles: i, ani, také, ještě. In Baroque Czech the conjunction natož and the modifier navíc are not used at all. The expression dokonce in most cases keeps its original quantitative/ totalising meaning. Analysing the Baroque Czech conjunctions, I have noticed that with regard to their meaning this intensifying expressions group does not share any common specific intensifying feature with one another, ie they do not form a homogeneous group in this respect. In my analysis I have also found out that in the medieval period the influence of the German syntax on the Czech syntax has increased: 1/ The German affirmative ja that changed into an intensifying conjunction also influenced the Czech affirmative ano, ba, which become an intensifying conjunction as well. 2/ Similarly, the German nicht allein – sondern inspired the expansion of the Czech conjunction nýbrž into netoliko/ nejen(om) – nýbrž.
ER -
KOSEK, Pavel. Stupňovací spojovací prostředky v barokní češtině. \textit{Listy filologické}. Praha: Filozofický ústav AV ČR, 2007, roč.~130, 1-2, s.~61-87, 26 s. ISSN~0024-4457.
|
