2007
Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, LiboraZákladní údaje
Originální název
Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
Název česky
Zpráva z výzkumu nebo vyprávění? Kvalitativní výzkum cenzury v českých společenských vědách, 1968-89.
Název anglicky
Reporting or Story-telling?: Qualitative Research on Censorship in Czech Social Sciences, 1968-89.
Autoři
OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora (203 Česká republika, garant)
Vydání
Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge, Sofia, Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, 0324-1572
Další údaje
Jazyk
bulharština
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50000 5. Social Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Bulharsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/07:00020708
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
Klíčová slova anglicky
narrative research; interdisciplinarity; narratology; writing modes
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 1. 2008 14:54, doc. Libora Oates-Indruchová, Ph.D.
V originále
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
Česky
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
Anglicky
If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.
Návaznosti
| GA405/03/1056, projekt VaV |
|