2006
Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.
VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY a Michele GAZZOLAZákladní údaje
Originální název
Evaluation of the Impact of Inclusion Policies under the Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union: Assessing the Cultural Policies of Six Member States.
Název česky
Evaluace dopadu politik začleňování metodou otevřené koordinace (OMC) v EU: Analýza kulturních politik šesti členských států.
Autoři
VAŠEČKA, Michal, Tove MALLOY a Michele GAZZOLA
Vydání
ECMI Working Paper, Flensburg, European Centre for Minority Issues, 2006, 1435-9812
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50000 5. Social Sciences
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
Klíčová slova anglicky
minorities; culture policies; OMC method; inclusion; integration; employment policies; inter-cultural navigators
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 20. 3. 2010 12:43, Mgr. Lucie Galčanová Batista, Ph.D.
V originále
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
Česky
There is a glaring lack of data collected by Member States in the area of immigrant inclusion and citizenship. Member States implement their common commitments in diverse ways. Member States tend to score consistently across the five areas. There are no major differences in policy between countries with long and short migration histories. Although statuses for immigrants are relatively difficult to acquire and weakly protected, they have significant rights associated with them. Naturalization remains one of the most problematic areas for Member States. This reflects the ongoing debate over whether migration should be seen as a long-term or temporary phenomenon.
Návaznosti
MSM0021622408, záměr |
|