Günther Mensching: Heidegger: Osudová odpověď na otázku po smyslu bytí

MÁCHA, Jakub. Günther Mensching: Heidegger: Osudová odpověď na otázku po smyslu bytí (Günther Mensching: Heidegger: A Fatal Answer to the Question of the Meaning of Being). Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity. Brno: MU, 2008, B 55, No 1, p. 47-57. ISSN 0231-7664.

Basic information

• Original name: Günther Mensching: Heidegger: Osudová odpověď na otázku po smyslu bytí
• Name (in English): Günther Mensching: Heidegger: A Fatal Answer to the Question of the Meaning of Being
• Authors: MÁCHA, Jakub (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
• Edition: Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity, Brno, MU, 2008, 0231-7664.

Other information

• Original language: Czech
• Type of outcome: Article in a journal
• Field of Study: 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• RIV identification code: RIV/00216224:14210/08:00035071
• Organization unit: Faculty of Arts
• Keywords in English: Heidegger;beiing;question of the meaning of being;Leader
• Tags: beiing, Heidegger, leader
• Tags: International impact, Reviewed

Abstract

Překlad přednášky Günther Mensching: Heidegger: Seinsfrage mit fataler Antwort.

Abstract (in English)

Translation of the paper Günther Mensching: Heidegger: Seinsfrage mit fataler Antwort. In his work "Being and Time", Martin Heidegger exposed a far-reaching question of the meaning of being. He concluded that for its forgottenness of being, the European metaphysics hasn't been able to pose and answer this question at all. In the present paper it is shown that Heidegger's thinking is related to the transcendental philosophy of I. Kant and to the philosophy of the German idealism. Existentials, Heidegger's crucial notions, are criticized because they are settled between the empirical and transcendental area and therefore they are mere metaphors. In his late philosophy, Heidegger was interested in language issues and their relevance to the thinking of being. Such thinking cannot accept traditional language because philosophy has to plunge into an authentic thinking in order to overcome metaphysics. All preceding fallacious interpretations of being are not considered as a mistake of an individual thinker, but as a current enowning of being. Concerning this, the author sees a relationship of Heidegger's thinking with politics. It is revealed that Heidegger didn't want to abandon this linkage in his publications after the war. The political implications are highly apparent in his identification of being with the Leader.