2008
To what extent is "standardized artificial soil" standard and artificial?
HOFMAN, Jakub, Ivana HOVORKOVÁ, Jiří MACHÁT, Angela RHODES, Kirk SEMPLE et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
To what extent is "standardized artificial soil" standard and artificial?
Název česky
Do jaké míry je "standardní umělá půdal" standardní a umělá?
Autoři
HOFMAN, Jakub (203 Česká republika, garant), Ivana HOVORKOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Jiří MACHÁT (203 Česká republika), Angela RHODES (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko) a Kirk SEMPLE (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko)
Vydání
SETAC Europe 18th Annual Meeting, 25-29 May 2008, Warshaw, Poland. In : Abstract Book, s. 97, 2008
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
10511 Environmental sciences
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/08:00028050
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
artificial soil
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 24. 2. 2010 20:40, prof. RNDr. Jakub Hofman, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Artificial soil was firstly introduced as a substrate for the earthworm acute toxicity test and it has been standardized as a medium for other soil tests too. Despite the fact that standardized reference material is necessary, several problematic issues exist which must be considered: Can be the results easily extrapolated to natural soils? How significant is variability of artificial soils from different labs? Our studies may help to clarify some of these issues. In the first study, the loss, extraction, and bioavailability of phenanthrene were compared in three artificial and three natural soils of the same organic carbon content. It seems according to our data that the results measured in the artificial soils can underestimate the situation in natural soils almost by one order of magnitude. In the second study, artificial soils were collected from EU labs and their properties were compared. We found that these artificial soils differed significantly in soil properties and also in sorption of pollutants. It is still an unanswered question, to which degree these findings may influence the toxicity results in the framework of ecological risk assessment.
Návaznosti
MSM0021622412, záměr |
|