Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and
artificial habitats

J 2010

Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats

LOSOSOVÁ, Zdeňka a Deana LÁNÍKOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats

Autoři

LOSOSOVÁ, Zdeňka (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Deana LÁNÍKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Journal of Vegetation Science, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, 1100-9233

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.457

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/10:00040521

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

UT WoS

000276656500009

Klíčová slova anglicky

BiolFlor; Czech Republic; Ellenberg indicator values; pCCA; Phylogeny; Regression tree model; Rock; Wall

Změněno: 7. 3. 2011 09:28, doc. RNDr. Zdeňka Lososová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Question: What are the differences in trait compositions which enable native plants to colonise comparable natural and man-made habitats? Are these traits independent of phylogenetic relationships between species? Location: Czech Republic Methods: The relative importance of biological, ecological and distributional traits of native species was studied, using a dataset of 75 species growing in rock and wall habitats in the Czech Republic. Species preferences for individual habitats due to climatic conditions and proportions of different vegetation types in their surrounding were partialled out using partial canonical correspondence analysis. The pattern of plant traits along a gradient from natural rock habitats to secondary wall habitats was analysed using regression trees and generalized linear models with and without phylogenetical correction. Results: The most common native species colonising rock habitats are phanerophytes, mostly woody juveniles, with a CSR life strategy and most of them are adapted to epizoochory. Summer green leaves, annual life span, CR life strategy, reproduction mostly by seeds and dispersal by ants are all traits positively associated with the ability of species to colonise wall habitats. These species are also characterized by their high demand for nutrients, temperature, base-rich substrates, and light. Biological and ecological traits are more important for colonizing new habitats than traits related to species dispersal ability or phylogenetical relationships between species. Biological and ecological traits alone explained 29.3% of variability in the species dataset, while dispersal characteristics and phylogeny alone explained 9.1% and 4.8% respectively. Conclusions: We outline how the process of environmental filtering determines the native species assemblages and identify a set of species traits that enable them to persist in particular habitats. We conclude that although urbanisation generally results in loss of natural habitats, there are new, man-made habitats potentially suitable for native species.

Návaznosti

IAA601630803, projekt VaV

Název: Makroekologická studie biodiverzity velkých měst: druhová bohatost, invaze a biotická homogenizace na příkladu dvou taxonomických skupin

Investor: Akademie věd ČR, Makroekologická studie biodiverzity velkých měst: druhová bohatost, invaze a biotická homogenizace na příkladu dvou taxonomických skupin

MSM0021622416, záměr

Název: Diverzita biotických společenstev a populací: kauzální analýza variability v prostoru a čase

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Diverzita biotických společenstev: kauzální analýza variability v prostoru a čase

Citovat

LOSOSOVÁ, Zdeňka a Deana LÁNÍKOVÁ. Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats. Journal of Vegetation Science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, roč. 21, č. 3, 11 s. ISSN 1100-9233.

@article{881233,
   author = {Lososová, Zdeňka and Láníková, Deana},
   article_location = {Oxford},
   article_number = {3},
   keywords = {BiolFlor; Czech Republic; Ellenberg indicator values; pCCA; Phylogeny; Regression tree model; Rock; Wall},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1100-9233},
   journal = {Journal of Vegetation Science},
   title = {Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats},
   volume = {21},
   year = {2010}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 881233
AU  - Lososová, Zdeňka - Láníková, Deana
PY  - 2010
TI  - Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats
JF  - Journal of Vegetation Science
VL  - 21
IS  - 3
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell
SN  - 11009233
KW  - BiolFlor
KW  - Czech Republic
KW  - Ellenberg indicator values
KW  - pCCA
KW  - Phylogeny
KW  - Regression tree model
KW  - Rock
KW  - Wall
N2  - Question: What are the differences in trait compositions which enable native plants to colonise comparable natural and man-made habitats? Are these traits independent of phylogenetic relationships between species? Location: Czech Republic Methods: The relative importance of biological, ecological and distributional traits of native species was studied, using a dataset of 75 species growing in rock and wall habitats in the Czech Republic. Species preferences for individual habitats due to climatic conditions and proportions of different vegetation types in their surrounding were partialled out using partial canonical correspondence analysis. The pattern of plant traits along a gradient from natural rock habitats to secondary wall habitats was analysed using regression trees and generalized linear models with and without phylogenetical correction. Results: The most common native species colonising rock habitats are phanerophytes, mostly woody juveniles, with a CSR life strategy and most of them are adapted to epizoochory. Summer green leaves, annual life span, CR life strategy, reproduction mostly by seeds and dispersal by ants are all traits positively associated with the ability of species to colonise wall habitats. These species are also characterized by their high demand for nutrients, temperature, base-rich substrates, and light. Biological and ecological traits are more important for colonizing new habitats than traits related to species dispersal ability or phylogenetical relationships between species. Biological and ecological traits alone explained 29.3% of variability in the species dataset, while dispersal characteristics and phylogeny alone explained 9.1% and 4.8% respectively. Conclusions: We outline how the process of environmental filtering determines the native species assemblages and identify a set of species traits that enable them to persist in particular habitats. We conclude that although urbanisation generally results in loss of natural habitats, there are new, man-made habitats potentially suitable for native species.
ER  -

LOSOSOVÁ, Zdeňka a Deana LÁNÍKOVÁ. Differences in trait compositions between rocky natural and artificial habitats. \textit{Journal of Vegetation Science}. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, roč.~21, č.~3, 11 s. ISSN~1100-9233.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci