Detailed Information on Publication Record
2010
Post prostatectomy in-vitro biopsy findings in patients with a clinically significant cancer: How reliable are the results of Vienna nomogram biopsy?
MAREČKOVÁ, Natália, Dalibor PACÍK, Aleš ČERMÁK, Leoš KŘEN, Zdeněk PAVLOVSKÝ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Post prostatectomy in-vitro biopsy findings in patients with a clinically significant cancer: How reliable are the results of Vienna nomogram biopsy?
Authors
MAREČKOVÁ, Natália (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Dalibor PACÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Aleš ČERMÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Leoš KŘEN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Zdeněk PAVLOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
European Urology Suplements, Elsevier B.V. 2010, 1569-9056
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.139
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/10:00046908
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000281880100467
Keywords (in Czech)
karcinom prostaty in-vitro biopsie Vídeňský nomogram
Keywords in English
prostate cancer in-vitro biopsy Vienna nomogram
Změněno: 18/1/2011 17:35, MUDr. Vítězslav Vít
V originále
The precisely performed in-vitro biopsy following the Vienna nomogram suggested a clinically significant cancer in only 40.43% of patients with the clinically sign ificant disease proved in final RAPE specimen.This findings should warn us of a real chance of underestimation of potentially clinically significant cancer
In Czech
Správně provedená in vitro biopsie podle Vídeňského nomogramu ukazuje klinicky signifikantní nádor pouze u 40.43% pacientů s klinicky signifikantním nádorem zjištěným z definitivního preparátu po radikální prostatektomii. Tyto nálezy mohou upozornit na reálnou šanci podhodnocení klinicky signifikantního nádoru