J 2010

Evaluation and comparison of composite and split-thickness skin grafts using Cutometer MPA 580

ŠÍN, Petr, Pavel BRYCHTA a Igor STUPKA

Základní údaje

Originální název

Evaluation and comparison of composite and split-thickness skin grafts using Cutometer MPA 580

Autoři

ŠÍN, Petr (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Pavel BRYCHTA (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Igor STUPKA (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters, 2010, 1121-1539

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences

Stát vydavatele

Itálie

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/10:00052256

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Allogeneic acellular dermis; Composite skin grafts; Cutometer mpa 580; Cutometric measurement

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 2. 2012 10:39, Mgr. Michal Petr

Anotace

V originále

Background. In our preliminary experiments we found that composite skin grafts consisting of allogeneic acellular dermis and thin epidermal autologous grafts applied to the excised burn wound in one stage led to better results in terms of vis-coelastic properties than autologous split-thickness skin grafts. Patients and methods. In ten burn patients we applied composite skin grafts consisting of allogeneic acellular dermis and thin epidermal autologous grafts and followed the quality of the reconstructed skin cover with a special device, Cutometer MPA 580, over a period of four years. Results. The cutometric curves demonstrated better viscoelastic properties in composite skin grafts than in conventional split-thickness skin grafts after four years. We found Cutometer MPA 580 to be an advantageous device for the objectification of improved quality of reconstructed skin cover. Discussion. Among the various methods the cutometer showed the advantage of being a non-invasive, precise, and objective method of measuring skin's viscoelastic properties. The Vancouver Scar Score is a subjective evaluation of skin viscoelasticity. Conclusion. Our prospective clinical study clearly demonstrated that cutometric measurement produced objective results in contrast to clinical evaluation, the Vancouver Scar Score, and other non-quantitative methods. Our hypothesis that composite skin grafts consisting of allogeneic acellular dermis and thin epidermal autologous grafts applied onto the excised burn wound in one stage led to better results in terms of viscoelastic properties than autologous split-thickness skin grafts was fully confirmed.