2011
MEFANET after four years of progressing: standardization of educational web platform among medical faculties
SCHWARZ, Daniel; Martin KOMENDA; Jaroslav MAJERNÍK; Vladimír MIHÁL; Stanislav ŠTÍPEK et. al.Basic information
Original name
MEFANET after four years of progressing: standardization of educational web platform among medical faculties
Authors
SCHWARZ, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution); Martin KOMENDA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Jaroslav MAJERNÍK (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution); Vladimír MIHÁL (203 Czech Republic); Stanislav ŠTÍPEK (203 Czech Republic) and Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Brno, MEFANET report 04 - Efficient multimedia teaching tools in medical education, p. 119-124, 6 pp. 2011
Publisher
Masarykova univerzita
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Proceedings paper
Field of Study
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/11:00052724
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
ISBN
978-80-210-5539-1
Keywords in English
educational network; distance education; educational technology; medical education; e-publishing
Tags
Reviewed
Changed: 15/4/2012 23:32, Mgr. Michal Petr
Abstract
V originále
The MEFANET project (MEdical FAculties NETwork) has initiated international, effective and open cooperation among all medical faculties in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. One of the elementary goals of the project is to advance medical teaching and learning with the use of modern information and communication technologies. As an instrument for that, MEFANET has decided to develop an original and uniform solution for educational web portals which are used, together with a central gate, to offer and share digital educational content. Recent developments have focused on a new set of tools for multidimensional assessment of published contents quality. The following four dimensions are included: 1) review, 2) typological classifi cation, 3) the level of the target groups, 4) users’ self-study score. This 4-D assessment promises wider range of tools for the organization of published contents, as well as the opportunity to present teaching materials provided with expert commentary from selected medical professional societies.