Detailed Information on Publication Record
2011
Možnosti vizualizace (přinejmenším) 4 druhů prostorovosti
TROJAN, Jakub and Jan TRÁVNÍČEKBasic information
Original name
Možnosti vizualizace (přinejmenším) 4 druhů prostorovosti
Name in Czech
Možnosti vizualizace (přinejmenším) 4 druhů prostorovosti
Name (in English)
Possibilities of visualization (at least) four kinds of spatiality
Authors
Edition
1. vyd. Brno, Prostorovosti: místa, území, krajiny, regiony, globiony, p. 116-125, 142 pp. 2011
Publisher
GaREP, spol. s r.o.
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
Earth magnetism, geodesy, geography
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
ISBN
978-80-904308-7-7
Keywords (in Czech)
prostorovost; GIS; vizualizace; rozšířená realita; kyberprostor
Keywords in English
spatiality; GIS; visualization; augmented reality; cyberspace
Tags
Reviewed
Změněno: 17/9/2011 14:54, RNDr. Jakub Trojan, MSc, Ph.D.
Abstract
In English
The paper deals with options of visualization of spatialities using information and communication technologies (ICT). Four types of spatialities described according to Hynek and Vávra (2007) have been selected and tested for current ICT methods. The natural and socioeconomic spatialities could be easily visualized by geographical information systems (GIS) with addition to 3D modeling. Whereas the natural spatiality is clearly connected to standard GIS visualization using typical layers combining, socioeconomic spatiality uses for expression of causalities cartograms and other advanced tools such as virtual tours etc. Imaginative or performative spatialities work more with other types of visualization, mostly based on advanced computer graphic and cyber/cybernetic space. Typical example is use of augmented reality technologies incorporated into mobile devices and mass delivered in ordinary use. Paper deals with the examples of visualization in each of the spatiality, critically discusses the potential and risks of computer-based tools used in visualization and proposes the suitable implementation in geographical sciences as well as possible transition among defined spatialities.