2011
La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York
VALDHANS, Jiří a Martin ORGONÍKZákladní údaje
Originální název
La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York
Název anglicky
Limited Arbitrability of Disputes Arising Out of Competition Law Infridgements And Possibility of Its Recognition Pursuant to New York Convention
Autoři
VALDHANS, Jiří (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Martin ORGONÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Valladolid, La Aplicación Privada Del Derecho de la Competencia, od s. 377-386, 10 s. 2011
Nakladatel
Lex Nova
Další údaje
Jazyk
španělština
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
50500 5.5 Law
Stát vydavatele
Španělsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/11:00050093
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
ISBN
978-84-9898-339-5
Klíčová slova anglicky
Arbitrability; competition Law; private enforcement; new york convention; recognition
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 27. 10. 2011 00:16, doc. JUDr. Jiří Valdhans, Ph.D.
V originále
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
Anglicky
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
Návaznosti
GP407/08/P624, projekt VaV |
|