Detailed Information on Publication Record
2011
La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York
VALDHANS, Jiří and Martin ORGONÍKBasic information
Original name
La Arbitrabilidad Limitada de los Litigios Surgidos de las Infracciones del Derecho de la Competencia Y la Posibilidad de Su Reconocimiento En Cumplimiento del Convenio de Nueva York
Name (in English)
Limited Arbitrability of Disputes Arising Out of Competition Law Infridgements And Possibility of Its Recognition Pursuant to New York Convention
Authors
VALDHANS, Jiří (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Martin ORGONÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Valladolid, La Aplicación Privada Del Derecho de la Competencia, p. 377-386, 10 pp. 2011
Publisher
Lex Nova
Other information
Language
Spanish
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher
Spain
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/11:00050093
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-84-9898-339-5
Keywords in English
Arbitrability; competition Law; private enforcement; new york convention; recognition
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 27/10/2011 00:16, doc. JUDr. Jiří Valdhans, Ph.D.
V originále
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
In English
There is diversity between countries in many issues of arbitration, for instance each country regulates, inter alia, its own conditions for arbitrability. The most common claims arising from the breach of competition law (declaratory relief, claims for damages, etc.) are arbitrable in some countries, but not in others. This may cause problems in enforcement of arbitral awards in foreign countries, since the lack of arbitrability in the State of enforcement is very basic reason for the refusal to recognize the arbitration award. This leads into a discrepancy between the likelihood of recognition and enforcement, first, of court decisions (under the Brussels I Regulation) and secondly, of arbitration awards (under New York Convention).
Links
GP407/08/P624, research and development project |
|