2012
Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Decitabine Versus Patient Choice, With Physician Advice, of Either Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
KANTARJIAN, Hagop M.; Xavier G. THOMAS; Anna DMOSZYNSKA; Agnieszka WIERZBOWSKA; Grzegorz MAZUR et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Decitabine Versus Patient Choice, With Physician Advice, of Either Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Autoři
KANTARJIAN, Hagop M. (840 Spojené státy, garant); Xavier G. THOMAS (250 Francie); Anna DMOSZYNSKA (616 Polsko); Agnieszka WIERZBOWSKA (616 Polsko); Grzegorz MAZUR (616 Polsko); Jiří MAYER (203 Česká republika, domácí); Jyh-Pyng GAU (158 Tchaj-wan); Wen-Chien CHOU (158 Tchaj-wan); Rena BUCKSTEIN (124 Kanada); Jaroslav CERMAK (203 Česká republika); Ching-Yuan KUO (158 Tchaj-wan); Albert ORIOL (724 Španělsko); Farhad RAVANDI (840 Spojené státy); Stefan FADERL (840 Spojené státy); Jacques DELAUNAY (250 Francie); Daniel LYSÁK (203 Česká republika); Mark MINDEN (124 Kanada) a Christopher ARTHUR (36 Austrálie)
Vydání
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Amer Soc Clinical Oncology, 2012, 0732-183X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 18.038
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14740/12:00060217
Organizační jednotka
Středoevropský technologický institut
UT WoS
000306556900020
Klíčová slova anglicky
Acute Myeloid Leukemia; clinical trial; Decitabine
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 11. 4. 2013 13:37, Olga Křížová
Anotace
V originále
This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Patients and Methods Patients (N=485) age around 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m2 per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m2 per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results The primary analysis with 396 deaths (81.6%) showed a nonsignificant increase in median OS with decitabine (7.7 months; 95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) versus TC (5.0 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 6.3; P=.108; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.04). An unplanned analysis with 446 deaths (92%) indicated the same median OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; nominal P=.037). The CR rate plus CRp was 17.8% with decitabine versus 7.8% with TC (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P=.001). AEs were similar for decitabine and cytarabine, although patients received a median of four cycles of decitabine versus two cycles of TC. The most common drug-related AEs with decitabine were thrombocytopenia (27%) and neutropenia (24%). Conclusion In older patients with AML, decitabine improved response rates compared with standard therapies without major differences in safety. An unplanned survival analysis showed a benefit for decitabine, which was not observed at the time of the primary analysis.