Přepnout na evidenci publikací, které mě citují.
OCELÍK, Petr a Filip ČERNOCH. Konstruktivismus a energetická bezpečnost v mezinárodních vztazích. Online. 2. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2014, 80 s. ISBN 978-80-210-6671-7. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-6671-2014.
Bibliografie
Buzan, B. (1993). From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization, 47(3), 327–352. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Buzan, B. (2007). From International to World Society. English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (1997). Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologicaly Untenable? The Copenhagen School Replies. Review of International Studies, 23(2), 241–250. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210597002416
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1997). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (2005). Bezpečnost: Nový rámec pro analýzu. Brno: Centrum strategických studií.
Adler, E. (2002). Constructivism and International Relations. V Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., & Simmons, B. A. (2002). Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Carter, E., & Nivola, P. (2009). Making Sense of “Energy Independence”. V J. Elkind, & C. Pascual, Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Ciutä, F. (2008). Intriguing Concept, Impracticable Policy: A Skeptical View on Energy Security. Energy in Europe and North America: From National to Human Security? Trento: A German Marshall Fund of the United States Policy Research Conference on Energy Security.
Ciutä, F. (2010). Conceptual Notes on Energy Security. Security Dialogue, 41(2), 123–144.
Ciutä, F., & Klinke, I. (2010). Lost in Conceptualization: Reading the “New Cold War” with Critical Geopolitics. Political Geography, 29(6), 323–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.06.005
Clements, C. (2003). No Blood for Oil? United States National Security, Oil, and the Arctic Wildlife Refuge. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 28(1), 87–125.
Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in Action. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, Inc.
Cowen, R. (1999). The Importance of Salt. Davis: University of California.
esnakas, G. (2010). Energy Resources in Foreign Policy: A Theoretical Approach. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 3(1), 30–52. DOI: 10.2478/v10076-010-0003-y
Dalby, S., & Tuathail, G. Ó. (1998). Re-Thinking Geopolitics: Towards a Critical Geopolitics. New York: Routledge.
Dannreuther, R. (2010). Energy Security. V J. P. Burgess, Handbook of New Security Studies (stránky144–153). Abingdon: Routledge.
De Cock, G. (2010). Contrasting the US’s and the EU’s Approach to Climate Security. EU GRASP Working Papers.
Debrix, F. (2007). Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. London & New York: Routledge.
Desch, M. C. (1998). Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies. International Security, 23(1), 141–170. 25(1), 123–137.
Deutsch, K. W. et al. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dittmer, J. (2010). Popular Culture and Geopolitics: Popular Culture, Geopolitics and Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Donnelly, J. P., & Trochim, M. K. (2006). The Research Methods Knowledge Base (3. vyd.). Mason: Atomic Dog.
Dunne, T. (1995). The Social Construction of International Society. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 374–379. DOI: 10.1177/1354066195001003003
Dunne, T. (2007). The English School. V T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith, International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity (stránky 127–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Energy Community. (2012). Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z http://www.energy-community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME
Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The Discourse of Welfare Reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 163–195. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00110
Farrell, T. (2002). Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review, 4(1), 49–72. DOI: 10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00252
Fattouh, B. (2012). The Financialization of Oil Markets: Potential Impacts and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Finnemore, M. (1996). Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. V P. J. Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security (stránky 153–185). New York: Columbia University Press.
Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interest in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Conseuences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Glenn, J., & Howlett, D. (2004). Neorealism. V J. Glenn, D. Howlett, & S. Poore, Neorealism versus Strategic Culture: A Debate (stránky 20–45). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Gray, C. S. (1981). Soviet American Arms Race. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Gray, C. S. (1999). Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back. Review of International Relations, 25(1), 46–69.
Guzzini, S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182. DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006002001
Guzzini, S., & Jung, D. (2004). Copenhagen Peace Research. V S. Guzzini, & D. Jung, Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research (stránky 1–12). London: Routledge.
Hansen, L. (2000). The Little Mermaid?s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millenium – Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 285–306.
Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London & New York: Routledge.
Heartfield, J. (2002). The “Death of the Subject” Explained. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.
Hirschová, M. (2004). Řečový akt, řečové jednání a komunikační fuknce výpovědi. Slovo a slovesnost, 65, 163–173.
Hobden, S., & Hobson, J. (2001). Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoder, L. (2010). The Power of D’oh! The Simpsons and the Representation of Politics in American Popular Culture. SOCIOweb. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z http://www.socioweb.cz/index.php?disp=teorie&shw=440&lst=107
Höijer, B. (2011). Social Representations Theory. A New Theory for Media Research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16.
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hough, P. (2000). Understanding Global Security (2. vyd.). Routledge: London & New York.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, London, Toronto, and Sydney: Simon & Schuster.
Chatterjee, S. (2003). Neo-realism, Neo-liberalism and Security. International Studies, 40(2), 125–144.
Checkel, J. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348.
Chester, L. (2009). Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature. Energy Policy, 38(2), stránky 887–895. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039
Jackson, R., & S?rensen, G. (2007). Introduction to International Relations. Theories and Approaches (3. vyd.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarvis, D. S. (2002). International Relations and the “Third Debate”. Postmodernism and Its Critics. London: Praeger.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2, 167–214. DOI: 10.2307/2009958
Johnston, I. A. (1995a). Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Johnston, I. A. (1995b). Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security, 19(4), 32–64. DOI: 10.2307/2539119
Katzenstein, P. J., & Okawara, N. (2001). Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security, 26(3), 153–185. DOI: 10.1162/016228801753399754
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396. DOI: 10.2307/2600589
Keohane, R. O., King, G., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientifi c Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence (3. vyd.). Longman.
Kier, E. (1995). Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars. International Security, 19(4), 65–93. DOI: 10.2307/2539120
Kirchner, E., & Berk, C. (2010). European Energy Security Co-operation: Between Amity and Enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 859–880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02077.x
Klare, M. T. (2005). Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America´s Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum (American Empire Project). New York: Holt Paperbacks.
Klare, M. T. (2008). Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Koďousková, H., Kuchyňková, P., & Leshchenko, A. (2012). Energetická bezpečnost asijských zemí a Ruské federace. Brno: MUNI Press.
Kohalyk, C. (2008). Energy Security and Strategic Culture: The Perspective of Japan. Kingston: Royal Military College of Canada.
Korin, A., & Luft, G. (2009). Turning Oil Into Salt: Energy Independence Through Fuel Choice. North Charleston: BookSurge Publishig.
Korkmaz, D., & Aalto, P. (2010). European Energy Security and the Integration Process. ECPR Standing Group of International Relations conference.
Kořan, M. (2008). Člověk, poznání a mezinárodní politika. Praha: Ústav mezinárodních vztahů.
Kratochvíl, P., & Tulmets, E. (2010). Constructivism and Rationalism in EU Externam Relations: The Case of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Berlin: Nomos Publishers.
Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, F. (1993). Constitutional Thought versus Value-Based Thought in World Order Studies. V R. A. Falk, R. C. Johansen, & S. S. Kim, The Constitutional Foundation of World Peace (stránky 211–227). New York: State University of New York Press.
Kurki, M. (2006). Causes of a Diveded Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory. Review of International Studies, 32(2), 189–216.
Kurki, M. (2008). Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurze, K. (2008). The Changing Discourse of Energy Security. A New Impetus for Energy Policy Integration in the European Union. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück.
Kydd, A. H. (2008). Methodological Individualism and Rational Choice. V C. Rues-Smit, & D. Snidal, The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (stránky 424–443). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantis, J. S. (2002). Strategic Culture and National Security Policy. International Studies Review, 4(3), 87–113. DOI: 10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00266
Lantis, J. S. (2006). Strategic Culture: From Clausewitz to Constructivism. Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Advanced Systems and Concepts Office.
Lantis, J. S. (2009). Strategic Culture and Tailored Deterrence: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(3), 467–485.
Lebow, R. N. (1994). The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism. International Organization, 47(1), 77–106.
Legro, J. W. (1995). Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo German Restraint During War II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Legro, J. W. (1996). Culture and Preferences in the International Cooperation Two-Step. The American Political Science Review, 90(1), 118–137. DOI: 10.2307/2082802
Linklater, A. (2005). The English School. V S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, a další, Theories of International Relations (3. vyd.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Little, R. (2000). The English School’s Conribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422. DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006003004
Marcel, V. (2001). The Constructivist Debate; Bringing Hermeneutics (Properly) In. Paris: Institut d?études politiques de Paris.
Mascotto, G. (2010). Demystifying Russia’s Energy Strategy toward China: Strategic Manipulation or Unwitting Vulnerability. Montreal: Centre d’études sur l’intégration et la mondialisation.
Mateus, N. (2010). EU?s Security Agenda and the Challenge of Flows. Porto: ECPR Pan-European Conference.
Moran, D., & Russell, J. (2009). Energy Security and Global Politics. The Militarization of Resource Management. New York: Routledge.
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. DOI: 10.1162/002081897550447
Moravcsik, A. (2001). Liberal International Relations Theory: A Social Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Musílek, K. (2011). Relační přístup ke studiu sociálních identit. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.
Mutimer, D. (1999). Beyond Strategy: Critical Thinking and the New Security Studies. V A. Snyder, Contemporary Security and Strategy (stránky 45–72). London: MacMamillan Press.
Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nye, J. S. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations.London & New York: Routledge.
Palonkorpi, M. (2008). Matter over Mind? Securitizing Regional Energy Interdependencies. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Aleksanteri Institute.
Poore, S. (2004). Strategic Culture. V J. K. Glenn, D. A. Howlett, & S. Poore, Neorealism versus Strategic Culture (stránky 45–75). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Price, R., & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259–294. DOI: 10.1177/1354066198004003001
Price, R., & Tannenwald, N. (1996). Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos. V P. J. Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Quackenbush, S. (2004). The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 30(2), 87–107.
Reus-Smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. V S. Burchil, A. Linklater, R. Devatak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, a další, Theories of International Relations (3. vyd.). Houndmill: Palgrave MacMillan.
Risse, T. (1995). Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ruggie, J. G. (1983). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic System. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300018993
Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300004732
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books.
Schelling, T. C. (1981). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sikkink, K. (1993). Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization, 47(3), 411–441.
Sikkink, K. (2011). Beyond the Justice Cascade: How Agentic Constructivism Could Help Explain Change in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University IR Colloqium.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Journal of Economics, 1, 99–118.
Snyder, J. L. (1977). The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations. A Project AIR FORCE report prepared fot the United States Air Force.
S?rensen, G. (1999). Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies, 47(3), 590–604. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00218
Sovacool, B. (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. London & New York: Routledge.
Stephan, H. R. (2004). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Review. SPIRE, Keele University.
Suganami, H. (2010). The English School in a Nutschell. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 9, 15–28.
Sztompka, P. (2000). The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma? Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
Taliaferro, J. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128–161. DOI: 10.1162/016228800560543
Taliaferro, J. (2006). State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State. Security Studies, 15(3), 464–495. DOI: 10.1080/09636410601028370
Terry, S. (2009). Defining Security: Normative Assumptions and Methodological Shortcomings. Calgary: University of Calgary.
Trinkunas, H. (2009). Venezuelan Strategic Culture. Florida International University. Applied Research Center Latin American and Caribbean Center.
Trombetta, J. (2008). Environmental Security and Climate Change: Analysing the Discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 585–602.
Trombetta, J. (2012). European Energy Security Discourses and the Development of a Common Energy Policy. Working Papers of the Energy Delta Gas Research.
Waever, O. (1996). The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate. V S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski, International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (stránky 149–185). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Waever, O. (2004). Aberyswyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New “Schools” in Security Theory and their Origins between Core and Periphery. Montreal: International Studies Association.
Waisová, Š. (2004). Od národní bezpečnosti k mezinárodní bezpečnosti. Kodaňská škola na křižovatce strukturálního realismu, anglické školy a sociálního konstruktivismu. Mezinárodní vztahy, 39(3).
Waisová, Š. (2006). Lidská bezpečnost – pojetí a strategie: komparace přístupů členských států Evropské unie angažujících se v Human Security Network. Mezinárodní vztahy, 41(1).
Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Weldes, J. (1996). Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 275–318. DOI: 10.1177/1354066196002003001
Wendt, A. (1987). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization,41(3), 335–370.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (2004). Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective. V S. Guzzini, & A. Leander, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics (stránky 181–220). London & New York: Routledge.
Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Winzer, C. (2011). Conceptualizing Energy Security. Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group. University of Cambridge.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Adelman, M. A. (1973). The World Petroleum Market. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Almons, G. A., & Verba, S. (1965). The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Map of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation: Revised Edition. New York: Basic Books.
Ayoob, M. (1997). Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective. V K. Krause, & M. C. Williams, Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (stránky 121–148). London: UCL Press.
Balzaq, T. (2010). Constructivism and Securitization Studies. V V. Mauer, & M. Dunn Cavelty, The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies (stránky 56–72). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Barry, B. (1986). Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Doctor Fisher’s Bomb Party. V J. Elster, & A. Hylland, Foundations of Social Choice Theory (stránky 11–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barša, P., & Císař, O. (2008). Anarchie a řád ve světové politice. Kapitoly z teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál.
Behraves, M. (17. červenec 2011). The Relevance of Constructivism to Foreign Policy Analysis. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z e-International Relations: http://www.e-ir.info/2011/07/17/the-relevance-ofconstructivism-to-foreign-policy-analysis/
Bellamy, A. J. (2005). International Society and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1999). Sociální konstrukce reality. Pojednání o sociologii vědění. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
Best, U. (2006). Europe, the Nation State and Centre-Periphery Discourses. Defi nitions of Security in the Debates about the Yamal and Baltic Pipelines. V L. Jesien, The Future of European Energy Security (stránky 101–112). Krakow: Tischner European University.
Blaikie, N. (2011). Designing Social Research. The Logic of Anticipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blencowe, A. (28. leden 2010). English School and Constructivism: A Model of Cooperatio rather than Synthesis. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z e-International Relations: http://www.e-ir.info/2010/01/28/englishschool-and-constructivism-a-model-of-cooperation-rather-than-synthesis/#_ftn13
Bloomfield, A., & Nossal, K. R. (2007). Towards an Explicative Understanding of Strategic Culture: The Cases of Australia and Canada. Contemporary Security Policy, 28(2), 286–307.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bots, P. W. (2008). Analyzing Actor Networks while Assuming “Frame Rationality”. Cambridge: Kennedy School of Governance, Harvard University.
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.
Buzan, B. (1983). People, States, and Fear. The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.