Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
OCELÍK, Petr a Filip ČERNOCH. Konstruktivismus a energetická bezpečnost v mezinárodních vztazích. Online. 2. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2014, 80 s. ISBN 978-80-210-6671-7. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-6671-2014.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1167044
Bibliografie |
---|
Buzan, B. (1993). From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization, 47(3), 327–352. Cambridge: Polity Press. |
Buzan, B. (2007). From International to World Society. English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (1997). Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologicaly Untenable? The Copenhagen School Replies. Review of International Studies, 23(2), 241–250. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210597002416 |
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1997). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. |
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (2005). Bezpečnost: Nový rámec pro analýzu. Brno: Centrum strategických studií. |
Adler, E. (2002). Constructivism and International Relations. V Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., & Simmons, B. A. (2002). Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. |
Carter, E., & Nivola, P. (2009). Making Sense of “Energy Independence”. V J. Elkind, & C. Pascual, Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. |
Ciutä, F. (2008). Intriguing Concept, Impracticable Policy: A Skeptical View on Energy Security. Energy in Europe and North America: From National to Human Security? Trento: A German Marshall Fund of the United States Policy Research Conference on Energy Security. |
Ciutä, F. (2010). Conceptual Notes on Energy Security. Security Dialogue, 41(2), 123–144. |
Ciutä, F., & Klinke, I. (2010). Lost in Conceptualization: Reading the “New Cold War” with Critical Geopolitics. Political Geography, 29(6), 323–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.06.005 |
Clements, C. (2003). No Blood for Oil? United States National Security, Oil, and the Arctic Wildlife Refuge. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 28(1), 87–125. |
Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in Action. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, Inc. |
Cowen, R. (1999). The Importance of Salt. Davis: University of California. |
esnakas, G. (2010). Energy Resources in Foreign Policy: A Theoretical Approach. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 3(1), 30–52. DOI: 10.2478/v10076-010-0003-y |
Dalby, S., & Tuathail, G. Ó. (1998). Re-Thinking Geopolitics: Towards a Critical Geopolitics. New York: Routledge. |
Dannreuther, R. (2010). Energy Security. V J. P. Burgess, Handbook of New Security Studies (stránky144–153). Abingdon: Routledge. |
De Cock, G. (2010). Contrasting the US’s and the EU’s Approach to Climate Security. EU GRASP Working Papers. |
Debrix, F. (2007). Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. London & New York: Routledge. |
Desch, M. C. (1998). Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies. International Security, 23(1), 141–170. 25(1), 123–137. |
Deutsch, K. W. et al. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Dittmer, J. (2010). Popular Culture and Geopolitics: Popular Culture, Geopolitics and Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. |
Donnelly, J. P., & Trochim, M. K. (2006). The Research Methods Knowledge Base (3. vyd.). Mason: Atomic Dog. |
Dunne, T. (1995). The Social Construction of International Society. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 374–379. DOI: 10.1177/1354066195001003003 |
Dunne, T. (2007). The English School. V T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith, International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity (stránky 127–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Energy Community. (2012). Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z http://www.energy-community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME |
Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The Discourse of Welfare Reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 163–195. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00110 |
Farrell, T. (2002). Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review, 4(1), 49–72. DOI: 10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00252 |
Fattouh, B. (2012). The Financialization of Oil Markets: Potential Impacts and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. |
Finnemore, M. (1996). Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. V P. J. Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security (stránky 153–185). New York: Columbia University Press. |
Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interest in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. |
Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press. |
Giddens, A. (1990). The Conseuences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. |
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Glenn, J., & Howlett, D. (2004). Neorealism. V J. Glenn, D. Howlett, & S. Poore, Neorealism versus Strategic Culture: A Debate (stránky 20–45). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. |
Gray, C. S. (1981). Soviet American Arms Race. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. |
Gray, C. S. (1999). Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back. Review of International Relations, 25(1), 46–69. |
Guzzini, S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182. DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006002001 |
Guzzini, S., & Jung, D. (2004). Copenhagen Peace Research. V S. Guzzini, & D. Jung, Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research (stránky 1–12). London: Routledge. |
Hansen, L. (2000). The Little Mermaid?s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millenium – Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 285–306. |
Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London & New York: Routledge. |
Heartfield, J. (2002). The “Death of the Subject” Explained. Leicester: Perpetuity Press. |
Hirschová, M. (2004). Řečový akt, řečové jednání a komunikační fuknce výpovědi. Slovo a slovesnost, 65, 163–173. |
Hobden, S., & Hobson, J. (2001). Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Hoder, L. (2010). The Power of D’oh! The Simpsons and the Representation of Politics in American Popular Culture. SOCIOweb. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z http://www.socioweb.cz/index.php?disp=teorie&shw=440&lst=107 |
Höijer, B. (2011). Social Representations Theory. A New Theory for Media Research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16. |
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Hough, P. (2000). Understanding Global Security (2. vyd.). Routledge: London & New York. |
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, London, Toronto, and Sydney: Simon & Schuster. |
Chatterjee, S. (2003). Neo-realism, Neo-liberalism and Security. International Studies, 40(2), 125–144. |
Checkel, J. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348. |
Chester, L. (2009). Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature. Energy Policy, 38(2), stránky 887–895. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039 |
Jackson, R., & S?rensen, G. (2007). Introduction to International Relations. Theories and Approaches (3. vyd.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Jarvis, D. S. (2002). International Relations and the “Third Debate”. Postmodernism and Its Critics. London: Praeger. |
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2, 167–214. DOI: 10.2307/2009958 |
Johnston, I. A. (1995a). Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Johnston, I. A. (1995b). Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security, 19(4), 32–64. DOI: 10.2307/2539119 |
Katzenstein, P. J., & Okawara, N. (2001). Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security, 26(3), 153–185. DOI: 10.1162/016228801753399754 |
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396. DOI: 10.2307/2600589 |
Keohane, R. O., King, G., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientifi c Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence (3. vyd.). Longman. |
Kier, E. (1995). Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars. International Security, 19(4), 65–93. DOI: 10.2307/2539120 |
Kirchner, E., & Berk, C. (2010). European Energy Security Co-operation: Between Amity and Enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 859–880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02077.x |
Klare, M. T. (2005). Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America´s Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum (American Empire Project). New York: Holt Paperbacks. |
Klare, M. T. (2008). Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York: Metropolitan Books. |
Koďousková, H., Kuchyňková, P., & Leshchenko, A. (2012). Energetická bezpečnost asijských zemí a Ruské federace. Brno: MUNI Press. |
Kohalyk, C. (2008). Energy Security and Strategic Culture: The Perspective of Japan. Kingston: Royal Military College of Canada. |
Korin, A., & Luft, G. (2009). Turning Oil Into Salt: Energy Independence Through Fuel Choice. North Charleston: BookSurge Publishig. |
Korkmaz, D., & Aalto, P. (2010). European Energy Security and the Integration Process. ECPR Standing Group of International Relations conference. |
Kořan, M. (2008). Člověk, poznání a mezinárodní politika. Praha: Ústav mezinárodních vztahů. |
Kratochvíl, P., & Tulmets, E. (2010). Constructivism and Rationalism in EU Externam Relations: The Case of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Berlin: Nomos Publishers. |
Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Kratochwil, F. (1993). Constitutional Thought versus Value-Based Thought in World Order Studies. V R. A. Falk, R. C. Johansen, & S. S. Kim, The Constitutional Foundation of World Peace (stránky 211–227). New York: State University of New York Press. |
Kurki, M. (2006). Causes of a Diveded Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory. Review of International Studies, 32(2), 189–216. |
Kurki, M. (2008). Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Kurze, K. (2008). The Changing Discourse of Energy Security. A New Impetus for Energy Policy Integration in the European Union. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück. |
Kydd, A. H. (2008). Methodological Individualism and Rational Choice. V C. Rues-Smit, & D. Snidal, The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (stránky 424–443). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Lantis, J. S. (2002). Strategic Culture and National Security Policy. International Studies Review, 4(3), 87–113. DOI: 10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00266 |
Lantis, J. S. (2006). Strategic Culture: From Clausewitz to Constructivism. Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Advanced Systems and Concepts Office. |
Lantis, J. S. (2009). Strategic Culture and Tailored Deterrence: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(3), 467–485. |
Lebow, R. N. (1994). The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism. International Organization, 47(1), 77–106. |
Legro, J. W. (1995). Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo German Restraint During War II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. |
Legro, J. W. (1996). Culture and Preferences in the International Cooperation Two-Step. The American Political Science Review, 90(1), 118–137. DOI: 10.2307/2082802 |
Linklater, A. (2005). The English School. V S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, a další, Theories of International Relations (3. vyd.). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. |
Little, R. (2000). The English School’s Conribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422. DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006003004 |
Marcel, V. (2001). The Constructivist Debate; Bringing Hermeneutics (Properly) In. Paris: Institut d?études politiques de Paris. |
Mascotto, G. (2010). Demystifying Russia’s Energy Strategy toward China: Strategic Manipulation or Unwitting Vulnerability. Montreal: Centre d’études sur l’intégration et la mondialisation. |
Mateus, N. (2010). EU?s Security Agenda and the Challenge of Flows. Porto: ECPR Pan-European Conference. |
Moran, D., & Russell, J. (2009). Energy Security and Global Politics. The Militarization of Resource Management. New York: Routledge. |
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. DOI: 10.1162/002081897550447 |
Moravcsik, A. (2001). Liberal International Relations Theory: A Social Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Harvard University. |
Musílek, K. (2011). Relační přístup ke studiu sociálních identit. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita. |
Mutimer, D. (1999). Beyond Strategy: Critical Thinking and the New Security Studies. V A. Snyder, Contemporary Security and Strategy (stránky 45–72). London: MacMamillan Press. |
Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. |
Nye, J. S. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. |
Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations.London & New York: Routledge. |
Palonkorpi, M. (2008). Matter over Mind? Securitizing Regional Energy Interdependencies. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Aleksanteri Institute. |
Poore, S. (2004). Strategic Culture. V J. K. Glenn, D. A. Howlett, & S. Poore, Neorealism versus Strategic Culture (stránky 45–75). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. |
Price, R., & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259–294. DOI: 10.1177/1354066198004003001 |
Price, R., & Tannenwald, N. (1996). Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos. V P. J. Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. |
Quackenbush, S. (2004). The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 30(2), 87–107. |
Reus-Smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. V S. Burchil, A. Linklater, R. Devatak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, a další, Theories of International Relations (3. vyd.). Houndmill: Palgrave MacMillan. |
Risse, T. (1995). Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Ruggie, J. G. (1983). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic System. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300018993 |
Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300004732 |
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books. |
Schelling, T. C. (1981). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
Sikkink, K. (1993). Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization, 47(3), 411–441. |
Sikkink, K. (2011). Beyond the Justice Cascade: How Agentic Constructivism Could Help Explain Change in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University IR Colloqium. |
Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Journal of Economics, 1, 99–118. |
Snyder, J. L. (1977). The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations. A Project AIR FORCE report prepared fot the United States Air Force. |
S?rensen, G. (1999). Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies, 47(3), 590–604. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00218 |
Sovacool, B. (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. London & New York: Routledge. |
Stephan, H. R. (2004). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Review. SPIRE, Keele University. |
Suganami, H. (2010). The English School in a Nutschell. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 9, 15–28. |
Sztompka, P. (2000). The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma? Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. |
Taliaferro, J. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128–161. DOI: 10.1162/016228800560543 |
Taliaferro, J. (2006). State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State. Security Studies, 15(3), 464–495. DOI: 10.1080/09636410601028370 |
Terry, S. (2009). Defining Security: Normative Assumptions and Methodological Shortcomings. Calgary: University of Calgary. |
Trinkunas, H. (2009). Venezuelan Strategic Culture. Florida International University. Applied Research Center Latin American and Caribbean Center. |
Trombetta, J. (2008). Environmental Security and Climate Change: Analysing the Discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 585–602. |
Trombetta, J. (2012). European Energy Security Discourses and the Development of a Common Energy Policy. Working Papers of the Energy Delta Gas Research. |
Waever, O. (1996). The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate. V S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski, International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (stránky 149–185). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
Waever, O. (2004). Aberyswyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New “Schools” in Security Theory and their Origins between Core and Periphery. Montreal: International Studies Association. |
Waisová, Š. (2004). Od národní bezpečnosti k mezinárodní bezpečnosti. Kodaňská škola na křižovatce strukturálního realismu, anglické školy a sociálního konstruktivismu. Mezinárodní vztahy, 39(3). |
Waisová, Š. (2006). Lidská bezpečnost – pojetí a strategie: komparace přístupů členských států Evropské unie angažujících se v Human Security Network. Mezinárodní vztahy, 41(1). |
Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press. |
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley. |
Weldes, J. (1996). Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 275–318. DOI: 10.1177/1354066196002003001 |
Wendt, A. (1987). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization,41(3), 335–370. |
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027764 |
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Wendt, A. (2004). Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective. V S. Guzzini, & A. Leander, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics (stránky 181–220). London & New York: Routledge. |
Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. |
Winzer, C. (2011). Conceptualizing Energy Security. Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group. University of Cambridge. |
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe. |
Adelman, M. A. (1973). The World Petroleum Market. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press. |
Almons, G. A., & Verba, S. (1965). The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown & Company. |
Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Map of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation: Revised Edition. New York: Basic Books. |
Ayoob, M. (1997). Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective. V K. Krause, & M. C. Williams, Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (stránky 121–148). London: UCL Press. |
Balzaq, T. (2010). Constructivism and Securitization Studies. V V. Mauer, & M. Dunn Cavelty, The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies (stránky 56–72). New York: Taylor & Francis. |
Barry, B. (1986). Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Doctor Fisher’s Bomb Party. V J. Elster, & A. Hylland, Foundations of Social Choice Theory (stránky 11–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Barša, P., & Císař, O. (2008). Anarchie a řád ve světové politice. Kapitoly z teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál. |
Behraves, M. (17. červenec 2011). The Relevance of Constructivism to Foreign Policy Analysis. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z e-International Relations: http://www.e-ir.info/2011/07/17/the-relevance-ofconstructivism-to-foreign-policy-analysis/ |
Bellamy, A. J. (2005). International Society and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1999). Sociální konstrukce reality. Pojednání o sociologii vědění. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury. |
Best, U. (2006). Europe, the Nation State and Centre-Periphery Discourses. Defi nitions of Security in the Debates about the Yamal and Baltic Pipelines. V L. Jesien, The Future of European Energy Security (stránky 101–112). Krakow: Tischner European University. |
Blaikie, N. (2011). Designing Social Research. The Logic of Anticipation. Cambridge: Polity Press. |
Blencowe, A. (28. leden 2010). English School and Constructivism: A Model of Cooperatio rather than Synthesis. Získáno 12. listopad 2012, z e-International Relations: http://www.e-ir.info/2010/01/28/englishschool-and-constructivism-a-model-of-cooperation-rather-than-synthesis/#_ftn13 |
Bloomfield, A., & Nossal, K. R. (2007). Towards an Explicative Understanding of Strategic Culture: The Cases of Australia and Canada. Contemporary Security Policy, 28(2), 286–307. |
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Bots, P. W. (2008). Analyzing Actor Networks while Assuming “Frame Rationality”. Cambridge: Kennedy School of Governance, Harvard University. |
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan. |
Buzan, B. (1983). People, States, and Fear. The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books. |