Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
VLČKOVÁ, Kateřina, Kateřina LOJDOVÁ, Josef LUKAS, Jan MAREŠ, Zuzana ŠALAMOUNOVÁ, Tomáš KOHOUTEK, Jarmila BRADOVÁ a Stanislav JEŽEK. Z posluchárny za katedru: Mocenské vztahy ve výuce studentů učitelství. Online. 1., elektronické vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015, 237 s. ISBN 978-80-210-8097-3. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8097-2015.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1334885
Bibliografie |
---|
Allen, S. (2005). The missing link in alternative certification: Teacher identity formation. Baltimore: University of Maryland, Baltimore County. |
Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies inMathematics, 58(2), 145–168. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-005-3618-2 |
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing – A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. |
Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press. |
Apple, M. W. (2013). Knowledge, power, and education. New York: Routledge. |
Arnett, J. J. (1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Human Development, 41(5–6), 285–315. DOI: 10.1159/000022591 |
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: Theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. |
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press. |
Arnett, J. J. (2012). Adolescence and emerging adulthood. Harlow: Pearson Education. |
Arnett, J. J., & Taber, S. (1994). Adolescence terminable and interminable: When does adolescence end? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23(5), 517–537. DOI: 10.1007/BF01537734 |
Aultman, L. P., Williams-Johnson, M. R., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Boundary dilemmas in teacher-student relationships: Struggling with „the line“. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 636–646. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.002 |
Barquist Hogelucht, K. S., & Geist, P. (1997). Discipline in the classroom: Communicative strategies for negotiating order. Western Journal of Communication, 61(1), 1–34. DOI: 10.1080/10570319709374560 |
Bendl, S. (2001). Školní kázeň: Metody a strategie. Praha: ISV. |
Bendl, S. (2004). Jak předcházet nekázni aneb kázeňské prostředky. Praha: ISV. |
Bergman, M. (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Los Angeles: SAGE. |
Berne, E. (1997). Co řeknete, až pozdravíte: transakční analýza životních scénářů. Praha: Lidove noviny. |
Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control: Volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. |
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor and Francis. |
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller. |
Blustein, D. L., Phillips, S. D., Jobin-Davis, K., Finkelberg, S. L., & Roake, A. E. (1997). A theory-building investigation of the school-to-work transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 364–402. DOI: 10.1177/0011000097253002 |
Boulding, K. (1989). Three faces of power. Newbury Park: SAGE. |
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (s. 487−511). NY: Oxford University Press. |
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
Bradova, J. (2013). Teacher movement trajectories as a predictor of classroom communication processes. Přispěvek prezentovany na konferenci Performativity, Materiality and Time, Kodaň. |
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa |
Brekelmans, M., & Creton, H. (1993). Interpersonal teacher behavior throughout the career. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (s. 81–102). London: The Falmer Press. |
Brewer, J. D., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Brookfield, S. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Bryant, J., & Bates A. (2010). The power of student resistance in action research: Teacher educators respond to classroom challenges. Educational Action Research, 18(3), 305–318. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2010.499742 |
Buzzelli, C., & Johnston, B. (2001). Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 873–884. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00037-3 |
Cangelosi, J. (2006). Strategie řízení třídy: jak získat a udržet spolupráci žáků při výuce. Praha: Portal. |
Clark, R., Livingstone, D., & Smaller, H. (2012). Teacher learning and power in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. |
Clegg, S. R., & Haugaard, M. (Eds.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of power. London: SAGE. |
Coates, D. (1991). Power and the state. In D103 Block 4, Politics and power. Society and social science: A foundation course (s. 36–72). Walton Hall: The Open University. |
Conway, P. F., & Clark, C. M. (2003). The journey inward and outward: A re-examination of Fuller´s concerns-based model of teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 465–482. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00046-5 |
Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721–739. DOI: 10.2307/2094546 |
Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (1997). Students’ and teachers’ perception of conflict and power. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 541–553. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)85542-4 |
Creswell, J. W. (1995). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, W. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, W. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Cummins, J. (2009). Pedagogies of choice: Challenging coercive relations of power in classrooms and communities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(3), 261–271. DOI: 10.1080/13670050903003751 |
Čap, J., & Mareš, J. (2001). Psychologie pro učitele. Praha: Portal. |
Danaher, G., Schirato, T., & Webb, J. (2000). Understanding Foucault. London: SAGE. |
Day, C. & Sachs, J. (2005). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. United Kingdom: Open University Press. |
Dewey, J. (1936). Rationality in education. The Social Frontier, December, 21(3), 71–73. |
Dickar, M. (2008). Corridor cultures: Mapping student resistance at an urban school. New York: NYU Press. |
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: The Free Press. |
Dvořak, D. (2010). Česká základní škola: vícepřípadová studie. Praha: Karolinum. |
Dvořak, D., Stary, K., & Urbanek, P. (2015). Škola v globální době: proměny pěti českých základních škol. Praha: Karolinum. |
Elias, S. (2007). Influence in the ivory tower: Examining the appropriate use of social power in the university classroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(11), 2532–2548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00269.x |
Elias, S. M., & Mace, B. L. (2005). Social power in the classroom: Student power in the classroom: Student attribution for compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1738–1754. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02193.x |
Ennis, C. D. (1995). Teachers’ responses to noncompliant students: The realities and consequences of a negotiated curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 445–460. DOI: 10.1016/0742-051X(95)00010-H |
Ergens, T. (2007). Dominance učitele a způsob jejiho vyjadřovani. Pedagogika, 27(4), 380–389. |
Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Ray, A. G. (2001). School psychologists’ perceptions of social power bases in teacher consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 1–23. DOI: 10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1201_01 |
Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Whichard, S. M. (2001). School psychologists’ and teachers’ perceptions of social power bases in school consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 483–497. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00085-1 |
Ericsson K. A. (2006). The Influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (s. 683–704). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
Erikson, E. H. (1999). Životní cyklus rozšířený a dokončený. Praha: Nakladatelstvi lidove noviny. |
Evertson, C., & Weinstein, C. (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
Felix, E. E. (2011). Modern approach to classroom discipline and management: Prevention and intervention strategies for students with behavioral problems. Bloomington: Xlibris Publishing. |
Fessler, R. (1995). Dynamics of teacher career stages. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (s. 171–192). New York: Teachers College Press. |
Fessler, R., & Ingram, R. (2003). The teacher career cycle revisited: New realities, new responses. In B. Davies & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (s. 584–590). London: Pearson Education. |
Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Foucault, M. (1978). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality. London: Penguin. |
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books. |
Foucault, M. (2000). Dohlížet a trestat: kniha o zrodu vězení. Praha: Dauphin. |
Foucault, M. (2005). The body of the condemned. In D. Egan & L. Chorbajian, Power: A critical reader (s. 25–27). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. |
Franzak, J. K. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of critical friends practice on the student teacher. English Education, 34(4), 258–280. |
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. |
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (s. 259–269). New York: Harper & Row. |
Friesen, M. D., & Besley, S. C. (2013). Teacher identity development in the first year of teacher education: A developmental and social psychological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.005 |
Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental characterization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226. DOI: 10.3102/00028312006002207 |
Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. London: Routledge. |
Gale, X. (1996). Teachers, discourses, and authority in the postmodern composition classroom. Albany: Sunny Press. |
Gavora, P. (2002). Rozhodnutie stať sa učiteľom – pohľad kvalitativneho vyskumu. Pedagogická revue, 54(3), 240–256. |
Gavora, P. (2005). Učitel a žáci v komunikaci. Brno: Paido. |
Giroux, H. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport: Bergin. |
Goffman, E. (1999). Všichni hrajeme divadlo. Praha: Nakladatelstvi studia Ypsilon. |
Golish, T. D., & Olson, L. N. (2000). Students’ use of power in the classroom: An investigation of student power, teacher power, and teacher immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 293–310. DOI: 10.1080/01463370009385598 |
Gootman, M. (1997). The caring teacher’s guide to discipline: Helping young students learn self-control, responsibility, and respect. Thousand Oaks: Corwin. |
Gore, J. (1995). On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(2),165–188. |
Grac, J. (1988). Persuázia: ovplyvňovanie človeka človekom. Martin: Osveta. |
Gramsci, A. (2005). Hegemony. In D. Egan & L. Chorbajian, Power: A critical reader (s. 10–11). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. |
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons. |
Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2013). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Mason: South-Western College Publishing. |
Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (2006). School, work, and emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds). Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (s. 257–277). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. |
Hammersley, M., & Woods, P. (Eds). (1984). Life in school: Sociology of pupil culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. |
Hargreaves, A. (1982). Resistance and relative autonomy theories: Problems of distortion and incoherence in recent Marxist analyses of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(2), 108–126. DOI: 10.1080/0142569820030201 |
Harrington, A. (2006). Moderní sociální teorie: základní témata a myšlenkové proudy. Praha: Portal. |
Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? (přispěvek na konferenci) In 2003 research conference of the Australian Council for Educational Research – Building teacher quality: What does the research tell us? Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Dostupne z: http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Pedagogy-and-assessment/Buildingeffective-learning-environments/Teachers-Make-a-Difference-What-is-the-Research-Evidence |
Hawes Denos, C. (2003). Negotiating for positioning of power in a primary classroom. Language Arts, 80(6), 416–424. |
Hemmings, A. (2000). The „hidden“ corridor curriculum. The High School Journal, 83(2), 1–10. |
Hendrickson, K. A. (2012). Student resistance to schooling: Disconnections with education in rural Appalachia. High School Journal, 95(4), 37–49. DOI: 10.1353/hsj.2012.0011 |
Holt, J. (1984). How children fail. London: Penguin. |
Holvast, A., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (1993). Socialization in student teaching. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (s. 136–145). London: The Falmer Press. |
Hrabal, V., & Pavelkova, I. (2010). Jaký jsem učitel. Praha: Portal. |
Cho, S. (2012). Critical pedagogy and social change: Critical analysis on the language of possibility. New York: Routledge. Chong, S., & Low, E.-L. (2009). Why I want to teach and how I feel about teaching – formation of teacher identity from pre-service to the beginning teacher phase. Educational Research for Policy & Practice, 8(1), 59–72. |
Chong, S., Low, E.-L., & Goh, K. C. (2011). Emerging professional teacher identity of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8), 50–63. |
Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers’ decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159–176. DOI: 10.2307/2112804 |
Innes, M. (2003). Understanding social control: deviance, crime and social order. Buckingham: Open University Press. |
Jacobs, G. (2012). Models of power and the deletion of participation in a classroom literacy event. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 353–371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01470.x |
Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Parents, task values, and real-life achievement-related choices. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (s. 405–439). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
Jacobs, J. E., Davis-Kean, P., Bleeker, M., Eccles, J. S., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). „I can, but I don’t want to“: The impact of parents, interests, and activities on gender differences in Math. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (s. 246–263). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
Jamieson, D. W., & Thomas, K. W. (1974). Power and conflict in the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(3), 321–336. DOI: 10.1177/002188637401000304 |
Janik, T. (2005). Znalost jako klíčová kategorie učitelského vzdělávání. Brno: Paido. Dostupne z http://www.ped.muni.cz/weduresearch/publikace/pvtp02.pdf |
Janik, T., & Mikova, M. (2006). Videostudie: Výzkum výuky založený na analýze videozáznamu. Brno: Paido. |
Kahler, T., & Capers, H. (1974). The Miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal, 4(1), 26–42. |
Kaščak, O. (2006). Moc školy: o formatívnej sile organizácie. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. |
Kaščak, O. (2008). O moci školy a bezmocnosti děti. Studia paedagogica, 13(1), 127–140. |
Kaščak, O. (2009). Vyznam a miesto riualov v pedagogickej teorii a praxi. Pedagogická orientace, 19(2), 38–52. |
Katz, L. G. (1972). The developmental stages of preschool teachers. Elementary School Journal, 73(1), 50–54. DOI: 10.1086/460731 |
Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1992). Student resistance to control. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (s. 85–100). New York: Routledge. |
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34(1), 19–28. DOI: 10.1080/03634528509378579 |
Keller, J., & Tvrdy, L. (2008). Vzdělanostní společnost? Chrám, výtah a pojišťovna. Praha: Sociologicke nakladatelstvi. |
Kenkmann, A. (2011). Power and authenticity: Moving from the classroom to the museum. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory, 61(3), 279–295. DOI: 10.1177/0741713610392766 |
Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., & Myers, S. A. (2009). College students’ use of behavioural alteration techniques as a function of aggressive communication. Communication Education, 58(1), 54–73. DOI: 10.1080/03634520802272299 |
Koucky, J., Ryška, R., & Zelenka, M. (2014). Reflexe vzdělání a uplatnění absolventů vysokých škol. Výsledky šetření REFLEX 2013. Praha: Pedagogicka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. |
Kratochvilova, J. (2014). Ritualy v životě jedne školy. Komenský, 139(1), 19–25. |
Kremer-Hayon, L., & Ben-Peretz, M. (1986). Becoming a teacher: The transition from teachers’ college to classroom life. International Review of Education, 32(4), 413–422. DOI: 10.1007/BF00597551 |
Kučera, M. (1995). Commitment a věčne rozpory učitelskeho povolani. In Stát se učitelem (s. 59–94). Praha: Pedagogicka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. |
Kuhl, J. (2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00045-8 |
Kunnen, E. S., Sappa, V., van Geert, P. L. C., & Bonica, L. (2008). The shapes of commitment development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 15(3–4), 113–131. DOI: 10.1007/s10804-008-9042-y |
Landsberger, H. (1958). Hawthorne revisited. Ithaca: The New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations. |
Lašek, J. (2004). Nova metoda zjišťovani klimatu třidy. In J. Lašek (Ed.), Aktuální otázky psychologie učitele (s. 69–75). Hradec Kralove: Gaudeamus. |
Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2014). Better than best practice. London: Routledge. |
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 |
Lewis, R. (2001). Classroom discipline and student responsibility: The students’ view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(3), 307–319. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00059-7 |
Lewis, R. (2008). The developmental management approach to classroom behaviour: Responding to individual needs. Camberwell: ACER Press. |
Linthicum, R. C. (2006). Building a people of power. Waynesboro, GA: Authentic Press. |
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Lojdova, K. (2014). „Citil jsem se jako bachař.“ Reflexe nove socialni role studenty učitelstvi na praxi. In J. Nehyba, J. Kolař, & M. Dubec, et al. (Eds.), Reflexe mezi lavicemi a katedrou (s. 87–97). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Lojdova, K. (2015). Neni nekazeň jako nekazeň: Rezistentni chovani žaků jako projev moci ve školni třidě. Orbis scholae, 9(1), 103–117. DOI: 10.14712/23363177.2015.74 |
Lojdova, K., & Lukas, J. (2015). Scenaře donucovaci moci u studentů učitelstvi na praxi: studentka Alice. Studia paedagogica, 20(3), 113–130. DOI: 10.5817/SP2015-3-7 |
Long, R. (1999). 20/20 hindsight: Teacher change and advice. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(11), 1–11. Dostupne z iteslj.org/Articles/Long-TeacherChange.html |
Lukas J., & Švařiček, R. (2007). Reflexe problematiky zkoumani identity učitele. In Svět výchovy a vzdělávání v reflexi současného pedagogického výzkumu. XV. konference České asociace pedagogického výzkumu s mezinárodní účastí pořádaná katedrou pedagogiky a psychologie Pedagogické fakulty JU. |
Lukas, J. (2007). Vyvoj učitele: přehled relevantnich teorii a vyzkumů (1. čast). Pedagogika, 57(4), 46–60. |
Lukas, J. (2008). Vyvoj učitele: přehled relevantnich teorii a vyzkumů (2. čast). Pedagogika, 58(1), 36–49. |
Macek, P. (1999). Adolescence: psychologické a sociální charakteristiky dospívajících. Praha: Portal. |
Macek, P. (2003). Adolescence. Praha: Portal. |
Macek, P. (2005). Kde konči dospivani a kde začina dospělost? In P. Macek & J. Dalajka (Eds.), Vývoj a utváření osobnosti v sociálních a etnických kontextech – víceoborový přístup (s. 217–225). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Macek, P., Bejček, J., & Vaničkova, J. (2007). Contemporary Czech emerging adults: Generation growing up in the period of social changes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(5), 444–475. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407305417 |
Macek, P., Ježek, S., Lacinova, L., Bouša, O., Kvitkovičova, L., Neužilova Michalčakova, R., & Širůček, J. (2016). Emerging adults in the Czech Republic: Views into and across different domains of life (s. 175–202). Žukauskienė, R. (Ed.). Emerging adulthood in a European context. New York: Routledge. |
Mainhard, M., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2011). Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within- and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 345–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.003 |
Makovska, Z. (2010). Pojeti moci v žakovskych vypravěnich. Studia paedagogica, 15(2), 141–151. |
Makovska, Z. (2011). Techniky změny chovani a jejich využiti ze strany žaků. Pedagogická orientace, 21(1), 85–103. |
Malach, J. (2007). Teorie metodiky výchovy. Praha: Univerzita Jana Amose Komenskeho. |
Maňak, J. (2003). Nárys didaktiky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Mareš, J. (2013a). Pedagogická psychologie. Praha: Portal. |
Mareš, J. (2013b). Nevhodne chovani učitelů k žakům a studentům. Studia paedagogica, 18(1), 7–36. DOI: 10.5817/SP2013-1-2 |
Mareš, J., & Beneš, J. (2013). Proměny studia učitelstvi na pedagogickych fakultach v ČR v letech 2000–2012 dane Boloňskym procesem. Pedagogika, 63(4), s. 427–450. |
Mareš, J., & Mareš, J. (2014). Autonomie dospivajiciho jedince: složity proces, nejisty vysledek. Pedagogika, 64(1), 81–98. |
Mareš, J., Slavik, J., Svatoš, T., & Švec, V. (1996). Učitelovo pojetí výuky. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita. |
Mareš, J., Vlčkova, K., Ježek, S., Lojdova, K., Lukas, J., & Šalamounova, Z. (2016, v připravě). Báze moci: Manuál k nástroji. Brno: Munipress. |
Maslow, A. H. (2014). O psychologii bytí. Praha: Portal. |
Mayer, D. (2001). „But that’s the thing: Who else is going to teach besides the idealist?“ Learning to teach in emotional contexts. In C. Day & J. Chi-Kin Lee (Eds.), New understandings of teachers work: Emotions and educational change (s. 137–150). New York: Springer. |
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32(2), 175–218. DOI: 10.1080/03634528309378527 |
McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). An introduction to communication in the classroom: The role of communication in teaching and training. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. |
McLaren, P. (1985). The ritual dimensions of resistance: Clowning and symbolic inversion. Journal of Education, 167(2), 84−97. |
McLaren, P. (1999). Schooling as a ritual performance: Toward a political economy of educational symbols and gestures. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. |
McLaren, P. (Ed.). (2006). Rage hope: Interviews with Peter McLaren on war, imperialism, critical pedagogy. New York: P. Lang. |
McNally, J., Cope, P., Inglis, W., & Stronach, I. (1997) The student teacher in school: Conditions for development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 485–498. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00057-1 |
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
Merriam, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Messersmith, E. E., Garrett, J. L., Davis-Kean, P. E., Malanchuk, O., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Career development from adolescence through emerging adulthood insights from information technology occupations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(2), 206–227. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407310723 |
Middendorf, J., & McNary, E. (2011). Development of a classroom authority observation rubric. College Teaching, 59(4), 129–134. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2011.580690 |
Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1994). Clinical research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (s. 340–352). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Molm, L. (1990). Structure, action, and outcomes: The dynamics of power in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 427–447. |
Molm, L. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
Moree, D. (2013). Učitelé na vlnách transformace: kultura školy před rokem 1989 a po něm. Praha: Karolinum. |
Moscovici, H. (2007). Mirror, mirrors on the wall, who is the most powerful of all? A self-study analysis of power relationships in science methods courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1370–1388. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20204 |
Nohavova, A. (2012). Vychovny efekt exprese: učit se o tom nebo to zakoušet ve vlastní tvorbě. In J. Mareš (Ed.), Učíme psychologii 2012. Sborník příspěvků z konference Učíme psychologii/Teaching psychology. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Novotny, P. (1997). Autoritařstvi jako jedna z determinant vykonu učitelske profese. Pedagogika, 47(3), 247–258. |
Obrovska, J. (2014). Ritualy s „těmi druhymi“: Perspektiva interakčnich ritualů ve školni etnografii etnicky různorodych třidnich kolektivů. Sociální studia, 11(2), 51–74. |
Oja, S. N. (1990). Developmental theories and the professional development of teachers. Přispěvek prezentovany na vyročnim setkani American Educational Research Association, Boston. |
Ottaway, A., K., C. (1998). Education and society: An introduction to the sociology of education. London: Routledge. |
Oyler, C. (1996). Making room for students: Sharing teacher authority in room 104. New York: Teachers College Press. |
Pace, J., L., & Henmmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 4–27. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298489 |
Pace, J., L., & Hemmings, A. (2006). Classroom authority: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Mahwah. |
Pariser, E. (1999). Relational education: An antidote to school-inducted despair. Dostupne z http://www.thecommunityschool.org/relational.htm |
Pařizek, V. (1988). Učitel a jeho povolání. Praha: SPN. |
Payne, R. (2015). Using rewards and sanctions in the classroom: pupils’ perceptions of their own responses to current behaviour management strategies. Educational Review, 67(4), 483–504. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2015.1008407 |
Pietarinen, J., & Merilainen, M. (2008). Aktivni a pasivni faze kariery učitele v kontextu malotřidni školy. Studia paedagogica, 13(1), 65–83. |
Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1997). A seven year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 225–235. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00014-5 |
Pillen, M. T., den Brok, P. J., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Profiles and change in beginning teachers’ professional identity tension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 86–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.003 |
Pineau, E. L. (1994). Teaching is performance: Reconceptualizing a problematic metaphor. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.3102/00028312031001003 |
Pišova, M., Hanušova, S., Kostkova, K., Janikova, V., Najvar, P., & Tůma, F. (2013). Učitel expert: jeho charakteristiky a determinanty profesniho rozvoje (na pozadi vyuky cizich jazyků). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Pittard, M. M. (2003). Developing identity: The transition from student to teacher. Přispěvek prezentovany na vyročnim setkani American Educational Research Association, Chicago. |
Pol, M. (2007). Škola v proměnach. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Pospišil, R. (2015, v tisku). Učitelé a řešení kázeňských problémů v základních školách (Disertačni prace). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Pratto, F., Pearson, A. R., Lee, I., & Saguy, T. (2008). Power dynamics in an experimental game. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 377–407. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-008-0075-y |
Pravdova, B. (2014). Já jako učitel: profesní sebepojetí studenta učitelství. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
Pražska skupina školni etnografie (2001). Co se v mládí naučíš. Praha: Pedagogicka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy. |
Prokop, J. (2005). Škola a společnost v kritickych teoriich druhe poloviny 20. stoleti. Praha: Karolinum. |
Proweller, A., & Mitchener, C. P. (2004). Building teacher identity with urban youth: Voices of beginning middle school science teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1044–1062. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20036 |
Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (s. 371–382). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. |
Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244. |
Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.x |
Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 307–332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x |
Rigel, M. (2012). Vyvoj kazeňskych postihů na školach v českych zemich aneb vyhani metla děti z pekla? Komenský, 137(2), 12–16. |
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33(1), 125–136. DOI: 10.1080/03634528409384729 |
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (Eds.). (1992). Power in the classroom. Communication, control, and concern. New York: Routledge. |
Richmond, V., & Roach, D. (1992). Power in the classroom: Seminal studies. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern (s. 47–66). New York: Routledge. |
Roach, K. D. (1995). Teaching assistant argumentativeness: Effects of affective learning and student perception on power use. Communication Education, 44(1), 15–29. DOI: 10.1080/03634529509378994 |
Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffit, T. E. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 582–593. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.582 |
Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Rinehart & Winston. |
Russell, B. (2004). Power: A new social analysis. New York: Routledge. |
Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 838–844. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021 |
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., & Kobarg, M. (Eds.). (2005). How to run a video study: Technical report of the IPN Video Study. Waxmann: Munster. |
Senge, P. (2000). The industrial age system of education. In P. Senge (Ed.), Schools that learn (s. 27–58). New York: Doubleday. |
Shindler, J. (2010). Transformative classroom management positive strategies to engage all students and promote a psychology of success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Shkedi, A., & Laron, D. (2004). Between idealism and pragmatism: A case study of student teachers’ pedagogical development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(7), 693–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.006 |
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L, & Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56(3), 308–323. DOI: 10.1080/03634520701256062 |
Schultz, B. D., & Oyler, C. (2006). We make this road as we walk together: Sharing teacher authority in a social action curriculum project. Curiculum Inquiry, 36(4), 423–451. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00365.x |
Sikes, P. J., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher career. Crises and continuities. London: The Falmer Press. |
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
Skorikov, V. B., & Vondracek, F. W. (2011). Occupational identity. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (s. 693–714). New York: Springer. |
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and Adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (s. 607–637). New York: Guilford Press. |
Smyth, J. (2006). When students have „relational power“: the school as a site for identity formation around engagement and school retention. Dostupne z http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/5245/when-students-have-relational-power-the-school-as-a-site-for-identity-formation-around-engagement-an |
Spoelstra, M., & Pienaar, W. (1999). Negotiation: Theories, strategies and skills. Kenwyn: Juta. |
Staton, A. Q. (1992). Teacher and student concern and classroom power and control. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey, Power in the classroom (s. 159–176). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
Steffy, B. E., et al. (2000). Life cycle of the career teacher. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. |
Steinberg, S. (1998). Unauthorized methods: Strategies for critical teaching. New York: Routledge. |
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert. |
Stroot, S., et al. (1998). Peer assistance and review guidebook. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education. |
Střelec, S. (1998). Kapitoly z teorie a metodiky výchovy I. Brno: Paido. |
Stuchlikova, I. (2013). Strukturovane studium učitelstvi – ano, či ne? Pedagogika, 63(4), 423–426. |
Swedberg, R., & Agevall, O. (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: Key words and central concepts. Stanford: Stanford Social Sciences. |
Šalamounova, Z. (2012). Žakovske odpovědi. In K. Šeďova, R. Švařiček, & Z. Šalamounova, Komunikace ve školní třídě (s. 75–109). Praha: Portal. |
Šalamounova, Z., & Švařiček, R. (2012). Komunikace z pohledu učitelů. In K. Šeďova, R. Švařiček, & Z. Šalamounova, Komunikace ve školní třídě (s. 215–228). Praha: Portal. |
Šalamounova, Z., Bradova, J., & Lojdova, K. (2014). Mocenske vztahy mezi začinajicimi učiteli a jejich žaky. Pedagogická orientace, 24(3), 375–393. DOI: 10.5817/PedOr2014-3-375 |
Šeďova, K. (2009). Co vime o vyukovem dialogu? Studia paedagogica, 14(2), 11–28. |
Šeďova, K. (2013). Humor ve škole. Brno: Munipress. |
Šeďova, K. (2011). Mocenske konstelace ve vyukove komunikaci. Studia paedagogica, 16(1), 89–118. |
Šeďova, K. (2012). Zakladni charakteristiky vyukove komunikace. In K. Šeďova, R. Švařiček, & Z. Šalamounova, Komunikace ve školní třídě (s. 41–52). Praha: Portal. |
Šeďova, K. (2015). Moc v dialogickem vyučovani. Pedagogická orientace, 25(1), 32–62. DOI: 10.5817/PedOr2015-1-32 |
Šeďova, K. & Švařiček, R. (2010). Zamlčene hodnoceni: zpětna vazba ve vyukove komunikaci na druhem stupni zakladni školy. Studia paedagogica, 15(2), 61–86. |
Šeďova, K., Švařiček, R., & Šalamounova, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě. Praha: Portal. |
Štech, S. (1994). Co je to učitelstvi a lze se mu naučit? Pedagogika 44(4), 310–320. |
Štech, S., & Viktorova, I. (1995). Typizačni postupy rodičů a učitelů na začatku 2. stupně ZŠ. In Pražska skupina školni etnografie. Typy žáků: Zpráva z terénního výzkumu (s. 49–97). Praha: Pedagogicka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. |
Šubrt, J. (2001). Dramaturgicky přistup Ervinga Goffmana. Sociologický časopis, 37(2), 241–249. |
Švařiček, R. (2011). Funkce učitelských otázek ve vyukové komunikaci na druhém stupni základni školy. Studia paedagogica, 16(1), 9–46. |
Švařiček, R. (2009). Narativní a sociální konstrukce profesní identity učitele experta (Disertačni prace). Dostupne z https://is.muni.cz/auth/th/12302/ff_d/SVARICEK_Narativni_a_socialni_konstrukce_profesni.pdf |
Švařiček, R., & Šeďova, K. (2010). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portal. |
Švec, V., Pravdova, B., & Svojanovsky, P. (2015). Determinanty účinnosti učitelských praxí. Brno: Munipress. |
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Torff, B. (2003). Developmental changes in teachers use of higher order thinking and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 563–569. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.563 |
Urbanek, P. (2004). Sebehodnoceni profesnich činnosti studenty učitelstvi (Analyza longitudinalniho šetřeni). In J. Škoda & P. Doulik (Eds.), Profese učitele a současná společnost. Usti nad Labem: PdF UJEP v Usti nad Labem. |
Vališova, A. (1998). Autorita jako pedagogický problém. Praha: Karolinum. |
Vališova, A., & Kasikova, H. (2011). Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada. |
van Huizen, P. H. (2000). Becoming a teacher. Development of a professional identity by prospective teachers in the context of university-based teacher education (Disertačni prace). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht. |
Veenman, S. (1987). On becoming a teacher: An analysis of initial training. Přispěvek prezentovany na konferenci Conference on Education of the World Rasque Congress, Bilbao. |
Viktorova, I. (1995). Studenti pedagogicke fakulty k profesi učitele. In Stát se učitelem (s. 95–117). Praha: Pedagogicka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze. |
Viktorova, I. (2011). Mimořadne udalosti v komunikaci rodiny a školy, Studia paedagogica, 16(2), 27–47. DOI: 10.5817/SP2011-2-2 |
Vlčkova, K., Mareš, J., & Ježek, S. (2015, v tisku). Adaptation of teacher power use scale to lower secondary students and student teachers. Pedagogická orientace, 25(6). |
Vlčkova, K., Mareš, J., Ježek, S., & Z. Šalamounova (2016, v připravě). Baze moci použivane učitelem ve školni třidě: česka adaptace dotazniku Teacher Power Use Scale. Pedagogika. |
Walkington, J. (2005). Becoming a teacher: encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 53–64. DOI: 10.1080/1359866052000341124 |
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1999). Pragmatika lidské komunikace. Hradec Kralove: Konfrontace. |
Weber, M. (1998). Metodologie, sociologie a politika. Praha: M. Havelka. |
Weidman, J. C. (2006). Socialization of students in higher education: Building on and extending lines of inquiry for the advancement of the public good. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin, The SAGE handbook for research in education (s. 253–262). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. |
Weller, L. D., & Weller, J. S. (2002). The assistant principal: Essentials for effective school leadership. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. |
Whiston, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493–568. DOI: 10.1177/0011000004265660 |
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press. |
Winograd, K. (2002). The negotiative dimension of teaching: Teachers sharing power with the less powerful. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 343–362. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00073-7 |
Wolcott, H. F. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Lanham: AltaMira Press. |
Woods, P. (1979). The divided school. London: Routledge. |
Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school. An interactionist viewpoint. London: Routledge. |
Woods, P. (1994). Adaptation and self-determination in English primary school. Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 387–410. DOI: 10.1080/0305498940200401 |