Aplikace umožňuje autorům spravovat bibliografické záznamy a přiřazovat je ke svým publik acím.
Přepnout na evidenci publikací, které mě citují.
Angloamerická recepce Ingardenova pojetí uměleckého literárního díla
ŘEHULKOVÁ, Hana. Angloamerická recepce Ingardenova pojetí uměleckého literárního díla. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015, 123 s. Spisy Filozofické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, sv. 441. ISBN 978-80-210-8058-4. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8058-2015.
Podrobněji: https://is.muni.cz/publication/1341706
Bibliografie
BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. (1966). Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present. New York: The Macmillan Company.
BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. (1981). Aesthetics. Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Indianapolis – Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
BLECHA, Ivan (2007). Proměny fenomenologie. Praha: Triton.
BRINKER, Menachem (1984). Roman Ingarden and the „Appropriate Aesthetic Attitude“ to the Literary Work of Art. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 5, no. 1.
BRINKER, Menachem (1980). Two Phenomenologies of Reading: Ingarden and Iser on Textual Indeterminacy. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 1, no. 4.
BRUNIUS, Teddy (1970). The Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 30, no. 4.
COLOMB, Gregory R. (1976). Roman Ingarden and the Language of Art and Science. In: The Journal of Aesthetisc and Art Criticism. Vol. 35, no. 1.
CURRIE, Gregory. Work and Text. In: Mind. Vol. 100, no. 3, 1991. V nepublikované překladu R. Niederleho.
ČAPEK, Karel (1956). Hordubal, Povětroň, Obyčejný život. Praha: Československý spisovatel.
ČERNÝ, Václav (1992). Poslední Čapkovo tvůrčí období a jeho demokratický humanismus. In: Tvorba a osobnost I. Praha: Odeon.
DAVIES, Stephen (2005). Ontology of Art. In: Levinson, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan, McCORMICK, Peter (eds.) (1989). On aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Interpretations and Assessements. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan (1989). Ingarden’s Theory of Values and the Evaluation of the Work of Art. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1989.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan (1975). Roman Ingarden’s View on the Aesthetic Attitude. In: Graff, P., Kazemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers.
FALK, Eugen H. (1981). Ingarden’s Concept of the Aesthetic Object. In: Comparative Literature Studies. Vol. 18, no. 3.
GALEWICZ, Wladzimierz (1990). The Aesthetic Object and the Work of Art: Reflections on Ingarden’s Theory of Aesthetic Judgement. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
GRAFF, Piotr, KAZIMIEN-OJAK, Slaw (eds.) (1975). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers.
HOWELL, Robert (2002). Ontology and the nature of the literary work. In: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 60.
HUSSERL, Edmund (2001). Idea fenomenologie. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
HUSSERL, Edmund (2004). Ideje k čisté fenomenologii a fenomenologické filosofii I. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1968). Karteziánské meditace. Praha: Svoboda.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1972). Krize evropských věd a transcendentální fenomenologie. Praha: Academia.
HUSSERL, Edmund (2010). Logická zkoumání II/1. Zkoumání k fenomenologii a teorii poznání. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
CHOJNA, Wojciech (2009). Roman Ingarden. In: Davies, S. (ed.). A Companion to Aesthetics. Wiley – Blackwell.
CHRUDZIMSKI, Arkadiusz (ed.) (2005). Existence, Culture, and Persons: the Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos.
INGARDEN, Roman, FIZER John, HERSHEL B. (1970). Chipp. Letters Pro and Con. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 28, no. 4.
INGARDEN, Roman (1961). A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 20, no. 2.
INGARDEN, Roman (1962). A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics, part II. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 20, no. 3.
INGARDEN, Roman (1961). Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 21, no. 3.
INGARDEN, Roman (1964). Artistic and Aesthetic Values. In: British Journal of Aesthtetics. Vol. 4.
INGARDEN, Roman (1987). Artistic and Aesthetic Values. In: Margolis, J. (ed.). Philosophy Looks at the Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
INGARDEN, Roman (2003). Fenomenologická estetika: Pokus o vymezení oblasti bádání. In Zuska, V. (ed.). Umění, krása, šeredno. Praha: Karolinum.
INGARDEN, Roman (1967). O poznávání literárního díla. Praha: Československý spisovatel.
INGARDEN, Roman (1966). Studia z estetyki. Tom 1. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
INGARDEN, Roman (1966). Studia z estetyki. Tom 2. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
INGARDEN, Roman (1970). Studia z estetyki. Tom 3. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
INGARDEN, Roman (1989). Umělecké dílo literární. Praha: Odeon.
ISEMINGER, Gary (2005). Aesthetics Experience. In: Levinson, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISEMINGER, Gary (1973). Roman Ingarden and the Aesthetics Object. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 33, no. 3.
JACOB, Pierre. Intentionality. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality/
JOYCE, James (1988). Dubliňané. Překlad Aloys Skoumal. Praha: Odeon.
KAELIN, Eugen F. (1990). The Debate over Stratification within Aesthetic Objects. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
KOCKELMANS, Joseph J.(1999). Phenomenology. In: Audi, R. (ed.). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MARAS, Steven (1998). The Bergsonian Model of Actualization. In: SubStance. Vol. 27, no. 1.
MARGOLIS, Joseph (ed.) (1987). Philosophy Looks at the Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk (1975). Places of Indeterminacy in a Literary Work . In: Graff, P., Krzemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers.
McCORMICK, Peter (1989). Literary Truths and Metyphysical Qualities. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic.
McHALL, Brian (1987). Postmodernist Lyric and the Ontology of Poetry. In: Poetics Today. Vol. 8, no. 1.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (2005). Concretization, Literary Criticism, and the Life of Literary Work. In: Chrudzimski, A. (ed.). Existence, Culture, and Persons. Frankfurt: Ontos.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Ingarden. In: Kelly, M. (ed.) (1998). Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (1985). Roman Ingarden’s „The Literary Work of Art“: Exposition and Analysis. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 45, no. 3.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff (1997). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
MORRIS, Charles (1983). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
NIEDERLE, Rostislav (2014). Pojmy estetiky: analytický přístup. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
OSBORN, Harold (ed.) (1972). Aesthetics. London: Oxford University Press.
POLI, Roberto. Nikolai Hatrmann. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nicolai-hartmann/
PROCHÁZKA, M. Roman Ingarden. In: Zeman, M. (a kol.) (1988). Průvodce po světové literární teorii. Praha: Panorama, 1988.
RISKA, Augustin (1976). Language and Logic in the Work of Roman Ingarden. In: Tymieniecka, A.-T. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. IV. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.
RUDNICKA, Hans H. (ed.) (1990). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
RUDNICK, Hans H. (1976). Roman Ingarden’s Literary Theory. In: Tymieniecka, A.-T. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. IV. Dortrecht – Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.
RUDNICK, Hans H. (1981).The Historicity of the Literary Work of Art: An Ingardenian Perspective. In: Comparative Literature Studies. Vol. 18, no. 3.
SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de (1989). Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Praha: Odeon.
SHUSTERMAN, Richard (1989). Ingarden, Inscription, and Literary Ontology. In: Dziemidok, B., McCormick, P. (eds.). On Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic.
SIMONS, Peter (1994). Strata in Ingarden’s Ontology. In: Galewicz, W., Stroker, E., Strozewski, W. (eds.). Kunst und ontologie. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
SMITH, Barry (1978). An Essay in Formal Ontology. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. Vol. 6.
SMITH, Barry (1980). Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction. In: Philosophy and Phenomenology Research. Vol. 41.
STRELKA, Joseph P. (1990). Roman Ingarden’s „Points of Indeterminateness“: A Consideration of Their Practical Application to Literary Criticism. In: Rudnick, H. H. (ed.). Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XXX. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
SWIRSKI, Peter (1998). Literature and Literary Knowledge. In: The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association. Vol. 31, no. 2.
ŠALDA, F. X. (1978). Dvě románové balady z Podkarpadské Rusi. In: O předpokladech a povaze tvorby. Praha: Československý spisovatel.
THOMASSON, Amie (1996). Fiction and Intentionality. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 56, no. 2.
THOMASSON, Amie. Roman Ingarden. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ingarden/
TYMIENIECKA, Anna-Teresa. (ed.) (1976). Analecta Husserliana. Vol. IV. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.