Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
HRBKOVÁ, Lenka. Understanding Policy Attitudes: Effect of Affective Source Cues on Political Reasoning. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2016, 173 s. ISBN 978-80-210-8056-0. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8056-2016.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1371795
| Bibliografie |
|---|
| Abelson, R. (1963). Computer Simulation of Hot Cognition. In S. Tomkins, & S. Messick (Eds.), Computer Simulation of Personality: Frontier of Psychological Theory (pp. 277-298). New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
| Achen, C. H. (1975). Mass Political Attittudes and the Survey Response. The American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1218-1231.A DOI: 10.2307/1955282 |
| Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information Effects in Collective Preferences. The American Political Science Review, 92(3), 545-558. DOI: 10.2307/2585480 |
| Andersen, R., Tilley, J., & Heath, A. (2005). Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice through the Electoral Cycle. British Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 285-302. |
| Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123405000153 |
| Arceneaux, K. (2008). Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability? Political Behavior, 30(2), 139-160. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-007-9044-7 |
| Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009). Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsement in a Grasroot Campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 755-770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00399.x |
| Aronson, A. (2013). Journal of Experimental Political Science. http://themonkeycage.org/2013/07/journal-of-experimental-political-science/ |
| Aronson, E., Brewer, M. B., & Carlsmith, M. J. (1985). In L. Gardner, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. 3rd Edition (pp. 441-486). New York: Random House. |
| Aronson, E., Brewer, M., & Carlsmith, M. (1985). “Experimentation in Social Psychology.” In L. Gardner & E: Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology 2nd Edition. Reading: Addison-Wesley. |
| Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence, & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 2. (pp. 89-195). London: Academic Press. |
| Bargh, J. (1997). The Automaticity of Everyday Life. In R. Wyer (Ed.), Advances of Social Cognition (pp. 1-61). Mahwan: Erlbaum. |
| Bargh, J. (2007). Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. |
| Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20-46. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 |
| Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194-230. DOI: 10.2307/2111700 |
| Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117-150. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021226224601 |
| Bassi, A. (2006). Experiments on Approval Voting. Working paper, New York University. |
| Baumeister, A. T. (2001). Bad Is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 |
| Baxter, B. W., & Hinson, R. E. (2001). Is smoking automatic? Demands of smoking behavior on attentional resources. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 59-66. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.59 |
| Bayes, T. (1763). An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. Philosophical Transactions, 53, 370-418. |
| Bechara, A. (2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain and Cognition, 55, 30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.001 |
| Bechara, A. et al. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215-225. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215 |
| Bechara, A. et al. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1294. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293 |
| Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22, 23-36 (Translation of Bernoulli, D. [1738]. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Papers Imp. Acad. Sci. St. Petersburg, 5, 175-192). DOI: 10.2307/1909829 |
| Bittner, A. (2015). Leader Evaluation and Partisan Stereotypes - A Comparative Analysis. In M. C. Lobo, & J. Curtice (Eds.), Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections (pp. 17-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Blondel, J. et al. (2010). Political Leadership, Parties and Citizens. The Personalization of Leadership. Abingdon: Routledge. |
| Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2013). The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion. Political Behavior, 36: 235-262. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0 |
| Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. |
| Boudreau, C. (2009). Closing the gap: When do cues eliminate differences sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens? Journal of Politics, 7, 964-975. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381609090823 |
| Box, G. E. P., Hunter W. G., & Hunter, S. J. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters. And Introduction to Design, Data, Analysis and Model Building. New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
| Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Brader, T. (2011). The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited. Political Psychology, 32(2), 337-346. |
| Brader, T. A. & Tucker, J. A. (2012a). Following the Party’s Lead: Party Cues, Policy Opinion, and the Power of Partisanship in Three Multiparty Systems. Comparative Politics, 44(4), 403-420. DOI: 10.5129/001041512801283004 |
| Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2009). What’s Left behind When the Party’s Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin’s Russia. Politics and Policy, 37(4), 843-868. |
| Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2012). Survey Experiments: Partisan Cues in Multi-Party Systems. In B. Kittel, W. J. Luhan, & R. B. Morton (Eds.), Experimental Political Science. Principles and Practices (pp. 112-138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Brader, T. A., Duell, D. & Tucker, J. A. (2013). Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1485-1517. DOI: 10.1177/0010414012453452 |
| Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52 (4), 959–978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x |
| Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning. The American Political Science Review, 79(4), 1061-1078. DOI: 10.2307/1956248 |
| Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105, 496-515. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000165 |
| Burdein, I., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2006). Experiments on the Automaticity of Political Beliefs and Attitudes. Political Psychology, 27, 359-371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00504.x |
| Cacioppo, J. T. et al. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032 |
| Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L, & Bertson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures. The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2 |
| Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L, & Bertson, G. G. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 8, 133-137. |
| Cacioppo, T. J., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall, and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97-109. |
| Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University Chicago Press. |
| Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297–312. DOI: 10.1037/h0040950 |
| Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. |
| Capelos, T. (2010). Feeling the Issues: How Citzens’ Affective Reactions and Leadership Perception Shape Policy Evaluations. Journal of Political Marketing, 9(1), 9-33. DOI: 10.1080/15377850903583038 |
| Caplan, B. (2007). The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton: Priceton University Press. |
| Caprara, G. V., and Vecchione, M. (2013). Personality Approaches to Political Behavior. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 23-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (1986). Trait Memory and Behavior Memory: The Effects of Alternative Pathways on Impression Judgment Response Times. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 50(1), 5-13. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.5 |
| Carmines, E. G. & Kuklinski, J. H. (1990). Incentives, Opportunities, and the Logic of public Opinion in American Political Representation. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urban: University of Illinois Press. |
| Carsey, T. M., & Layman, G. C. (2006). Changing Sides of Changing Minds: Party Identification and Policy Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464-477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00196.x |
| Cassino, D., & Lodge, M. (2007). The Primacy of Affect in Political Evaluation. In R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior (pp. 101-123). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Cassino, D., Lodge, M. & Taber, C. S. (2014). Implicit Political Attitudes: When, How, Why, With What Effects? In K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808-822. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 |
| Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989) Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inferences Processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 912-940. DOI: 10.2307/2111115 |
| Converse, P. E. (1964). The Nature of Belief System in mass Public. In D.E. Apter (Ed.). Ideology and Discontent. (pp. 206-261), New York: Free Press. |
| Cover, A. D., & Brumberg, B. S. (1982). Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion. American Political Science Review, 76, 347-59. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400187040 |
| Curtice, J. (2003). Elections as Beauty Contests: Do the Rules Matter? Paper presented at the International Conference, Lisbon. |
| Curtice, J., & Blais, A. (2001). Follow My Leader? A Cross-National Analysis of Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Democracies. Working paper, University of Oxford. |
| Curtice, J., & Holmberg, S. (2005). Party leaders and party choice. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), The European Voter (pp. 235-254). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Curtice, J., & Lisi, M. (2013). The Impact of Leaders in Presidential and Parliamentary Regimes. In M. C. Lobo, & J. Curtice (Eds.), Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections (pp. 63-86). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Dakhlia, J. (2010). Politique People. Paris: Edition Breal. |
| Dalton, R. J. (2002). The Decline of Party Identification. In R.J. Dalton, & M.P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (pp. 19-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon. |
| Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1413-1420. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0125 |
| Delli Caprini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1991). Stability and Change in the U.S. Public’s Knowledge of Politics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 583-612. DOI: 10.1086/269283 |
| Delli Caprini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know About Politics And Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
| Demertzis, N. (2006). The Affect Dimension in Political Tension. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Dickson, E., & Scheve, K. (2006). Testing the Effects of Social Identity Appeals in Election Campaigns: An fMRI Study. Working paper, Yale University. |
| Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley. |
| Druckman, J. N. (2001). The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015006907312 |
| Druckman, J. N. et al. (2006). The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science. American Political Science Review, 4, 627- 635. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055406062514 |
| Druckman, J. N. et al. (2011). Experimentation in Political Science. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 3-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base“. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 41-57). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297-321. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y |
| Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57-79. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055412000500 |
| Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. |
| Eibl, O., Chytilek, R., & Linek, L. (Forthcoming). Obrana, akvizice či nesoutěž? Jak se měnila podoba a intenzita soutěže mezi českými stranami v letech 2006-2014? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review. |
| Evans, J. S. T. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. |
| Fazio, R. et al. (1986). On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229-238. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 |
| Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick, & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 74-97). London: Sage Publications. |
| Feldman, S., & Conover, P. J. (1983). Candidates, Issues and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception. The Journal of Politics, 455(4), 810-839. DOI: 10.2307/2130414 |
| Feldman-Barett, L. (2015). Psychology is not in crisis. The New York Times Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/01/opinion/psychology-is-not-in-crisis.html?_r=0 |
| Festinger, L. (1975). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. |
| Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
| Fischle, M. (2000). Mass Response to the Lewinsky Scandal: Motivated Reasoning or Bayesian Updating? Political Psychology, 21(1), 135-159. |
| Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. S. (1991). Social Cognition. 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| Fiske, T. S. (1980). Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889 |
| Fiske, T. S., et al. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Statis and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 |
| Flanagan, M. F., & Dipboye, R. L. (1980). Representativeness does have implication for the generalizability of laboratory and field research findings. American Psychologist, 35, 464-467. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.464 |
| Funk, C. (1997). Implications of Political Expertise in Candidate Trait Evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50(3), 675-697. DOI: 10.1177/106591299705000309 |
| Garzia, D. (2011). The Personalization of Politics in the Western Democracies. Causes and Consequences on Leader-Follower Relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 697-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.010 |
| Garzia, D. (2012). The Rise of Party/Leader Identification in Western Europe. Political Research Quarterly, 20, 1-12. |
| Garzia, D. (2013). Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of partisan Attachments in Western Europe. Political Psychology, 34(1), 67-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x |
| Garzia, D. (2013). Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change in Western Europe. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting. |
| Gelman, A. (2014). The connection between varying treatment effects and the crisis of unreplicable research: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Management, 41(2), 632-643. |
| Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1998). Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 794-818. DOI: 10.2307/2991730 |
| Gigerenzer, G. et al. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650 |
| Gigerenzer, G., & Stelten, R. (2001). Rethinking Rationality. In G. Gigerenzer, & R. Stelten (Eds.), Bounded Rationality: the Adaptive Toolbox (pp. 1-12). Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. |
| Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. (2002). How good are fast and frugal heuristics? In T. Gilovich, & D. Griffin (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment; heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. (pp. 559-581). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phase and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford. |
| Goren, P. (2005). Party Identification and Key Political Values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881-896. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x |
| Goren, P., Federico, Ch. M., & Kitilson, M. C. (2009). Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 805-20. |
| Gosnell, Harold F. (1926). An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. American Political Science Review, 20, 869–874. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400110524 |
| Grant, J. T. et al. (1999). The Accessibility of Party Identification during a Political Campaign Season. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. |
| Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2003). The Underprovision of Experiments in Political Science. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 94-112. DOI: 10.1177/0002716203254763 |
| Greenwald,A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitude, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Political Review, 102(1), 814-136. |
| Greitemeyer, T. et al. (2009). Biased assimilation: The role of source position. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 22-39. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.497 |
| Groenendyk, E. W. (2013). Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Gschwend, T. (2005). Analyzing Quota Sample Data and the Peer-review Process. French Politics, 3, 99-91. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200068 |
| Guala, F. (2003). Experimental Localism and External Validity. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1195-1205. DOI: 10.1086/377400 |
| Hájek, R. (2012). Personalizace, estetizace a depolitizace politiky v českých médiích: Mediální pokrytí sjezdů ČSSD a kongresů ODS mezi lety 1994-2011 v denících Právo a Mladá fronta Dnes. Mediální studia, 1, 76-93. |
| Hanley, S. (2011). Dynamika utváření nových stran v České republice v letech 1996-2010: hledání možných příčin politického zemětřesení. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 47(1), 115-136. |
| Hastie, R. (1986). A primer of information-processing theory for the political scientist. In R.R. Lau, & D. O Sears (Eds.), Political Cognition: The nineteenth Carnegie annual Symposium on Cognition, (pp. 11-39). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. |
| Hayter, A. J. (1986). The maximum familywise type I error rate of Fisher’s least significant difference test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 1000-1004. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478364 |
| Henry, P. J. (2008). College Sophomores in the Laboratory Redux: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of the Nature of Prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19 (2), 49-71. DOI: 10.1080/10478400802049936 |
| Henry, P. J. (2008). Student Sampling as a Theoretical Problem. Psychological Inquiry, 19 (2), 114-126. DOI: 10.1080/10478400802049951 |
| Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underline variations in political ideology. Behavioral Brain Sicence, 37(3), 297-307. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192 |
| Hloušek, V., & Kopeček, L. (2005). Cleavages in Contemporary Czech and Slovak Politics: between Persistence and Change. Presented at the ECPR Conference, Budapest, 8-10 September 2005. |
| Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1987). Fine tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, 1147-1149. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551 |
| Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J.W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of American Statistical Association, 81, 991-999. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363 |
| Holbrook, A. L. (2011). Attitude Change Experiments in Political Science. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 141-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Holtz-Bacha, C. (2004). Germany: How private life of politicians got into the media. Parliamentary Affairs, 57(1), 41-52. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsh004 |
| Hooghe et al. (2012). Gathering Counter-Factual Evidence: An Experimental Study on Voters’ Responses. In B. Kittel, W. J. Luhan, & R. B. Morton (Eds.), Experimental Political Science: Principles and Practices (pp. 233-248). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Hsee, Ch. K. (1995). Elastic justification: How tempting but task irrelevant factors influence decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 330-337. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1054 |
| Hsee, Ch. K. (1998). Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly then high value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 107-121. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<107::AID-BDM292>3.0.CO;2-Y |
| Huckfeldt, R. et al. (1999). Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 888-911. DOI: 10.2307/2991839 |
| Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (2000). Political Consequences of Inconsistency: The Accessibility and Stability of Abortion Attitudes. Political Psychology, 21, 57-79. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00177 |
| Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2006). On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger. In A. Crigler, M. MacKuen, G. E. Marcus, & W. R. Neuman (Eds.), The Political Dynamics of Feeling and Thinking. The University of Press. |
| Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013). Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanism. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176, 5-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01032.x |
| Jackson, M., & Cox, D. R. (2013). The Principles of Experimental Design and Their Application in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39 (1), 27-49. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145443 |
| Jacobson, G. C. (1992). The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Harper Collins |
| Jacoby, W. G. (1988). The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes. American journal of Political Science, 32(3), 643-661-Jimenez-Buedo, M., & Miller, L. M. (2010). Why a Trade-Off? The Relationship between the External and Internal Validity of Experiments. Theoria, 69, 301-321. DOI: 10.2307/2111240 |
| Jurek P. (2012) Personalizace volebního systému - případ Poslanecké sněmovny Parlamentu ČR. Politics in Central Europe, 8(2), 124-140. |
| Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, Motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407-424. |
| Kahneman, D. (2011). Myšlení rychlé a pomalé. Brno: Jan Melvil. |
| Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. DOI: 10.2307/1914185 |
| Kalkhoff, W. et al. (2007). Human Participants in Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences. In M. Webster, & J. Sell (Eds.). Laboratory Experiments in Social Sciences (pp. 243-263). Burlington: Elsevier. |
| Kam, C. D. (2005). Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences. Political Behavior, 27(2), 163-182. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y |
| Kam, C. D. (2007). When Duty Calls, Do Citizens Answer? Journal of Politics, 69, 17–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00491.x |
| Kam, C. D. et al. (2007). Beyond the “Narrow Data Base“: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research. Political Behavior, 29 (4), 415-440. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-007-9037-6 |
| Karvonen, L. (2010). The Personalization of Politics. A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press. |
| Key, V. O. (1996). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936-1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. |
| Kinder, D. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. Lau, & D. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 235-255). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
| Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1968). Unhappy memories of the “happy past”: Studies in cognitive dissonance. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 157-166. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01128.x |
| Kriesi, H. (2011). Personalization of national election campaign. Party Politics, 1-20. |
| Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196-210. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196 |
| Kruglansi, A. W. (1975). The Human Subject in the Psychology Experiment: Fact and Artifact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 101–147. |
| Kruglanski, A. W. (1980). Lay epistemology process and contents. Psychological Review, 87, 70-87. |
| Kuhn, R. (2010). President Sarkozy and news media management. French Politics, 8(4), 355-376. DOI: 10.1057/fp.2010.18 |
| Kuklinski, J. H. & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D., McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality (153-182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Kuklinski, J. H., & Hurley, N. L. (1994). On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-Taking. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 729-751. DOI: 10.2307/2132190 |
| Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case of Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-490. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 |
| Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge: The MIT Press. |
| Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2008). Reassessing the Role of Anxiety in Vote Choice. Political Psychology, 29(2), 275-296. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00626.x |
| Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2011). Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making? Political Psychology, 32(2), 347-361. |
| Langer, A. I. (2007). A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945-1999). Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 371-387. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsm028 |
| Lau, R. L., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951-71. DOI: 10.2307/2669334 |
| Lau, R. L., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How Voters Decide. Information Processing during Election Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Lau, R. R. (2003). Models of Decision-Making. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 19-59). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Lavine, H. G. (2010). A Sketch of Political Psychology. In H. G. Lavine (Ed.), Political Psychology. London: Sage Publications. |
| Lavine, H. G., Johnston, Ch. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The Ambivalent Partisan. How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Lavine, H., Bordiga, E., & Sullivan, J. L. (2000). On the Relationship between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing. Political Psychology, 21, 81-106. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00178 |
| Lebo, M. J. & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28, 723-746. |
| Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. Advances in Political Psychology, 35(1), 129-156. |
| Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, Anger and Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146 |
| Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01433 |
| Levin, J. R., Serlin, R. C., & Seama, M. A. (1994). A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 153-159. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.153 |
| Lewis-Beck, M. S. et al. (2008). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. |
| Lieberman M. D., Schreiber D., & Ochsner K. N. (2003). Is Political Cognition Like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking. Political Psychology, 24, 681–704. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00347.x |
| Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflective and Reflexive Judgment Processes. A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. In F. P. Joseph, W. D. Kipling, & W. Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes, (pp. 44-67). New York: Cambridge University Press |
| Lindquist, K. A. (2013). Emotions Emerge from More Basic Psychological Ingredients: A Modern Psychological Constructionist Model. Emotion Review, 5(4), 356-368. DOI: 10.1177/1754073913489750 |
| Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Constructing Emotion. The Experience of Fear as a Conceptual Act. Psychological Science, 19(9), 898-903. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02174.x |
| Linek, L. (2012). Volební podpora nových stran TOP 09 a VV. In L. Linek (ed.), Voliči a volby 2010 (pp. 166-187). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. |
| Linek, L. (2014). Čistá a celková volatilia v Česku v letech 1990-2013: stejný koncept, odlišná měření a podobné závěry? Acta Politologica, 6(1), 24-38. |
| Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2005). The Automaticity of Affect for Political Candidates, Parties, and Issues: Experimental Tests of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26, 455-482. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x |
| Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Lodge, M., McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989). An Impression- Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 399-419. DOI: 10.2307/1962397 |
| Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995) The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326. DOI: 10.2307/2082427 |
| Lopes, L. L. (1991). The Rhetoric of Irrationality. Theory of Psychology, 1(1), 65-82. DOI: 10.1177/0959354391011005 |
| Lowell, L. A. (1910). The Psychology of Politics. American Political Science Review, 4, 1-15. |
| Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63-76. DOI: 10.2307/2944882 |
| Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Lyons, P. (2008). Politická informovanost: teorie, koncepty a měření. In L. Linek, & P. Lyons (Eds.), Politická informovanost občanů: teorie, měření a role při zkoumání politických postojů (pp. 14- 52). Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR. |
| MacKuen et al. (2010). Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 440-458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x |
| MacKuen, M. (2007). The Third Way: The Theory of Affective Intelligence and American Democracy. In R., Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior (pp. 124-151). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Malhotra, N., & Kuo, A. G. (2008). Attributing Blame: The Public’s Response to Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120-135. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381607080097 |
| Malka, A. , & Soto, C. J. (2014) How encompassing is the effect of negativity bias on political conservatism? Behavioral Brain Sicence, 37(3), 320-321. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X13002653 |
| Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, R. W. (2011). Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence. Political Psychology, 32(2), 323-336. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x |
| Marcus, G. E., Neumann, R. W., & MacKuen M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Mark, D. (2009). Going Dirty. The Art of Negative Cmapaigning. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. |
| Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A Dynamic Simlutaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice. American Political Science Review, 3, 1055-1070. DOI: 10.2307/1953989 |
| Mattes, K. & Redlawsk, D. P. (2014). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigns. Chicago: The Chicago University Press. |
| Matušková, A. (2010). Politický marketing a české politické strany. Volební kampaně 2006. Masarykova univerzita: Brno. |
| McAllister, I. (2007). The Personalization of Politics. In R. Dalton, & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 571-588). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis, 10, 325-342. DOI: 10.1093/pan/10.4.325 |
| McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental Methods in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 31-61. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.091001.170657 |
| McDermott, R. (2011). Internal and External Validity. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 27–40). New York. Cambridge University Press. |
| McGraw, K. (2000). Contribution of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 21 (4), 805-832. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00217 |
| McGraw, K., & Hoekstra, V. M. (1994). Experimentation in Political Science: Historical Trends and Future Directions. In M. Delli Caprini, L. Huddy, & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in Micropolitics (pp. 3-30). Greenwich: JAI Press. |
| McGraw, K., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). Order Effects in the Evaluation of Political Candidates. Political Behavior, 12(1), 41-58. |
| McGuire, W. J. (1969). An information-processing model of advertising effectiveness. In H.L. Davis, & A.J. Silk (Eds.), Behavioral and Management Sciences in Marketing. New York: Ronald. |
| Mederios, M., & Noel, A. (2002). The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47(7), 1022-1046. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488560 |
| Meffert, M. F. et al. (2006). The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During Political Campaigns. Journal of Communication, 56, 27-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x |
| Meffert, M. F., & Gschwend T. (2011). Motivated Voters and Campaign Information: Information Selection, Processing, and Effects in a Multiparty System. Paper presented at the ECPR Conference, Reykjavik. |
| Merolla, J. L., Stephenson, L. B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2007). La aplicación de los métodos experimentales en el estudio de los atajos informativos en México. Política y Gobierno, 14(1), 117‐142. |
| Merolla, J. L., Stephenson, L. B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2008). Can Canadians take a hint? The (in)effectiveness of party labels as information shortcuts in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 673-696. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423908080797 |
| Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority: an experimental view. London: Tevistock. |
| Miller, G. A. (1957). The magic of number seven, plus minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-93. DOI: 10.1037/h0043158 |
| Miller, J. A., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations. Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44 (2), 295-309. DOI: 10.2307/2669312 |
| Milligan, K. et al. (2003). Response Latency Methodology for Survey Research: Measurement and Modeling Strategies. Political Analysis, 11, 289-301. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpg004 |
| Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnnusson, & D. Endler (Eds.), Endler Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology (pp.333-352). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
| Mondak, J. J. (1993). Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues. Political Behavior, 15(2), 167-192. DOI: 10.1007/BF00993852 |
| Mondak, J. J. (1993a). Source Cues and Policy Approval: The Cognitive Dynamics of Public Support for the Reagan Agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 186-212. DOI: 10.2307/2111529 |
| Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Mook, D. G. (1983). In Defense of External Invalidity. American Psychologist, 4, 379–387. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379 |
| Morris, J. P. et al. (2003). Activation of Political Attitudes: A Psychosociological Examination of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis. Political Psychology, 24(4) 727-745. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00349.x |
| Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C. (2008). Experimentation in Political Science. In J. M. Box-Stefensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 339-356). New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C. (2010). Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Mulligan, K. et al. (2003). Response Latency Methodology for Survey Research: Measurement and Modeling Strategies. Political Analysis, 11(3), 289-301. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpg004 |
| Neumann, W. R. et al. (2007). The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Nicholson, S. P. (2011). Dominating Cues and the Limitsof Elite Influence. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1165-1177. DOI: 10.1017/S002238161100082X |
| Nir, L. (2011). Motivated Reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504-532. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfq076 |
| Oscarsson, H. (2007). A Matter of Fact? Knowledge Effects on the Vote in Swedish General Elections, 1985-2002. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(3), 301-322. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00182.x |
| Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1991). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychology Bulletin, 92, 382-402. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 |
| Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1465-1475. DOI: 10.1177/01461672002612002 |
| Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origins and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics. Political Psychology, 36(1), 45-78. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12237 |
| Petersen, M. B. et al. (2013). Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues. Political Behavior, 35, 831-854. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-012-9213-1 |
| Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, T. J. (1979). Issue Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915 |
| Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, T. J. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Boulder: Westview Press. |
| Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, T. J. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes of Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag. |
| Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. London: Penguin Books. |
| Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. D. (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Popkin, S. L. (1991). The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915 |
| Prior, M. (2007). Is Partisan Bias in Perceptions of Objective Conditions Real? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. |
| Rahat, G., & Sheafer, T. (2007). The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel 1949-2003. Political Communication, 24, 65-80. DOI: 10.1080/10584600601128739 |
| Rahn, W. M. (1993). The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472-96. DOI: 10.2307/2111381 |
| Rahn, W. M. et al. (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. Ferejohn, & J. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. |
| Rahn, W. M., Sullivan, J. L., & Rudolph, T. J. 2002. Political Psychology and political Science. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Thinking about Political Psychology (pp. 155-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.00161 |
| Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). Feeling Politics. Emotion in Political Information Processing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Lau, R. R. (2007). Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information processing and learning in a campaign. In A. Crigler, M. MacKuen, G. E. Marcus, & W. R. Neuman. (Eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior (pp. 152-179). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Renshon, J., Lee, J. J., & Tingley, D. (2014). Physiological Arousal and Political Belief. Political Psychology, 36, 569–585. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12173 |
| Riggle, E. D. et al. (1992). Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information. Political Behavior, 14(1), 67-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00993509 |
| Richardson, B. M. (1991). European party loyalties revisited. American Political Science Review, 85: 751-775. DOI: 10.2307/1963849 |
| Rose, R., & Mishler, W. (1998). Negative and positive party identification in post-Communist countries. Electoral Studies, 17, 217-234. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X |
| Rosema, M. (2006). Partisanship, candidate evaluations, and prospective voting. Electoral Studies, 25(3), 467-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.017 |
| Roth, A. E. (1995). Introduction to Experimental Economics. In J. H. Kagel, & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 3-109). Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22(1):1-13. |
| Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2 |
| Russel, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145 |
| Samuels, D., & Zucco, C. Jr. (2014). The Power of Partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from Survey Experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 212-225. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12050 |
| Sarason, I. G., Smith R. E., and Diener E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 32(2), 199-204. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.199 |
| Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practical procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 577-586. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.577 |
| Sears, D. O. (1986). College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of Human Nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 515-530. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515 |
| Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. |
| Scherer, K. R. (2005). Unconscious processes in emotion: The bulk of the iceberg. In L. F. Barrett, P. M. Niedenthall, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and Consciousness (312-334). New York: Guilford. |
| Schram, A. (2005). Artificiality: The Tension between Internal and External Validity in Economic Experiments. Working paper, University of Amsterdam. |
| Schulz-Hardt, S. et al. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655-669. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655 |
| Sigelman, L. et al. (1991). Reconsidering Pocketbook Voting: An Experimental Approach. Political Behavior, 13 (2), 129-149. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992293 |
| Sikk, A. (2011). Newness as a winning formula for new political parties. Party Politics, 18(4), 465-486. DOI: 10.1177/1354068810389631 |
| Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. DOI: 10.2307/1884852 |
| Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138. DOI: 10.1037/h0042769 |
| Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administration Organization. New York: Free Press. |
| Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review, 68, 1-16. |
| Simon, H.A. (1979). Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 363-396. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002051 |
| Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 |
| Slovic, P. et al. (2002). The Affect Heuristics. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420), New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Sniderman, P. M. (2000). Taking Sides. A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 67-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice. Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Spezio, M. L., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional Processing and Political Judgment: Toward Integrating Political Psychology and Decision Neuroscience. In W. R. Neumann, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), Affect Effect. Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior (pp.71-95). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate Politics. Publicity, Privacy and the Personal Lives of Politicians in Media-Saturated Democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press. |
| Stokes, D. E. (1966). Party loyalty and the likelihood of deviating elections. In A. Campbell, P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, & D. E. Stokes (Eds.), Elections and the Political Order (pp. 125-135), New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
| Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2016). The Illusion of Choice in Democratic Politics: The Unconscious Impact of Motivated Political Reasoning. Advances in Political Psychology, 37(1), 61-85. |
| Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Leaders. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x |
| Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 227-236. DOI: 10.2307/3033716 |
| Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 74-83. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74 |
| Thomassen, J. (1976). Party identification as a cross-national concept: Its meaning in Netherlands. In I. Budge, I. Crewe, & D. Farlie (Eds.), Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition (pp. 63-80). London: Wiley. |
| Thomassen, J., & Rosema, M. (2008). Party identification revisited. In J. Bartle, & P. Bellucci (Eds.), Partisanship: Party Identification, Social Identities, and Political Experiences (pp. 42-59). London: Rutledge. |
| Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269. DOI: 10.1037/h0070363 |
| Tomz, M., & Sniderman, P. M. (2005). Brand Names and the Organization of Mass Belief Systems. Working paper https://web.stanford.edu/~tomz/working/TomzSniderman2005.pdf |
| Triplett, N. (1989). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9 (4), 507-33. DOI: 10.2307/1412188 |
| Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. |
| Turner, J. F. (2007). The Messenger Overwhelming the Message: The Impact of Ideological Cues on Informational Acquisition, Counterarguing and Perceptions of Media Bias. Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida State University. |
| Tversky, A., & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124-1131. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 |
| Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum M. C., & Ilis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 607-617. |
| Vaish, A., Grossman, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 383-403. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383 |
| Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 156-170. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381610000939 |
| Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation. Political Behavior, 31, 307-330. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7 |
| Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2011). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 1-18. |
| Van Bavel, J. J. et al. 2016. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. PNAS. Available at: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/documents/VanBavel.et.al.Contextual.Sensitivity.PNAS.pdf |
| Van Houweling, R. P., & Sniderman, P. M. (2005). The Political Logic of Downsian Space. Working paper, University of California Berkley. |
| Vlachová, K. (2003). Dynamika pozitivní a negativní stranické identifikace v České republice. Sociologický časopis, 39(4), 487-508. |
| Von Neumann, J., & Morgernstern, O. (1994). Theory of Games and Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| Voženílková, M., & Šedo, J. (2015). Personalizace volebního systému v návrzích volebních reforem v České republice. Evropská volební studia, 10(1), 33-50. |
| Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1996). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(4), 325–34. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(66)90026-6 |
| Wattenberg, M. P. (1995). The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
| Westen, D., et al. (2006). Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1947-1958. |
| Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and Thinking. Preferences Need No Inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151 |
| Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the Primacy of Affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117-123. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117 |
| Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123-131. DOI: 10.1086/208905 |
| Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A Simple Theory of Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 93-108. DOI: 10.2307/2111583 |