Bibliografie - správa publikací, které cituji
DONTCHEVA-NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Olga. Coherence in political speeches. Online. 1., elektronické vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2017, 208 s. Spisy Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, sv. 152. ISBN 978-80-210-8859-7. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8859-2017.
Podrobněji:
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1403302
| Bibliografie |
|---|
| Akman, V. (2000) ‘Rethinking context as a social construct.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32, 743-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00067-3 |
| Aktas, R., Cortes, V. (2008) ‘Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL academic writing.’ Journal of English for Specific Purposes 7, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002 |
| Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., Goetz, E. T. (1977) ‘Frameworks for comprehending discourse.’ American Educational Research Journal 14(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014004367 |
| Anthony, L. (2010) Antconc 3.2.1. http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html. |
| Askehave, I., Swales, J. (2001) ‘Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution,’ Applied Linguistics 22(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195 |
| Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Bach, K., Harnish, R. M. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. |
| Bach, K., Harnish, R. M. (1992) ‘How performatives really work: A reply to Searle.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834 |
| Бахтин, M. M. (1975) Вопросы литературы и эстетики. Исследования разных лет. Москва: Художественная литература |
| Bavelas, J., Black, A., Bryson, L., Mullet, J. (1988) ‘Political equivocation: A situational explanation.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700204 |
| Bazzanella, C., Damiano, R. (1999) ‘Coherence and misunderstanding in everyday conversation.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 175-187. |
| Beaugrande, R. de, (1980) Text, Discourse, and Process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. |
| Beaugrande, R. de, Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. |
| Bednarek, M. (2006) Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum. |
| Bellert, I. (1970) ‘On a condition of the coherence of texts.’ Semiotica 2(4), 335-363. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1970.2.4.335 |
| Bhatia, V. A. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman. (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-12-20 09:49:40) |
| Bhatia, V. A. (2002) ‘Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.’ Ibérica 4, 3-19. |
| Bhatia, V. A. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum. |
| Biber, D. (1994) ‘An analytical framework for register studies.’ In: Biber, D., Finegan, E. (eds) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 31-56. |
| Biber, D., Conner, U., Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Biber, D., Conrad, S. (2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. |
| Blackwell, S. (2001) ‘Testing the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora: The influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish.’ Journal of Pragmatics 33, 901-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80034-5 |
| Blakemore, D. (2004) ‘Discourse markers.’ In: Horn, L. R., Waed, G. (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell. 221-240. |
| Bolívar, A. (2001) ‘The negotiation of evaluation in written text.’ In: Scott, M., Thompson, G. (eds) Patterns of Text in Honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 129-258. |
| Bolívar, A. (2010) ‘Dialogue in the dynamics of political practice.’ In: Koike, D. A., Rodrígez-Alfano, L. (eds) Dialogue in Spanish. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 159-188. |
| Brown, G., Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Bublitz, W. (1988) Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views on coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7. |
| Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. (1999) ‘Disturbed coherence: “Fill me in”.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 153-174. |
| Bühler, K. (1990[1934]) ‘The model of language as organon.’ In: Theory of Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 30-39. |
| Bull, P., Fetzer, A. (2006) ‘Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews.’ Text and Talk 26(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002 |
| Bybee, J., Fleischman, S. (1995) Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., Coulthard, M. (eds) (1996) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Campbell, K. S. (1994[2008]) Coherence, Continuity and Cohesion: Theoretical Foundations for Document Design. New York, London: Routledge. |
| Cap, P. (2007) ‘Proximization: A methodological account of legitimization strategies in the post-9/11 US political discourse.’ Topics in Linguistics 1, 13-17. |
| Carter, R., McCarthy, T. (1988) Vocabulary and Language Teaching. New York: Longman. |
| Carter, R., McCarthy, M. (2006) Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Chafe, W. (1992[2003]) ‘Discourse: Overview.’ In: Bright, W. (ed., 1992), Frawley, W. (ed., 2003) International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Charniak, E. (1975) ‘Organization and inference in a frame-like system of common knowledge.’ In: Schank, R. C., Nash-Webber, B. L. (eds) Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman Inc. |
| Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Chilton, P., Schäfner, C. (1997) ‘Discourse and politics.’ In: van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. 206-230. |
| Chung, S., Timberlake, A. (1985) ‘Tense, aspect and mood.’ In: Shopen, T. (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-258. |
| Cohen, R. (2001) ‘Language and negotiation: A Middle East lexicon.’ In: Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 67-92. |
| Connor, U. (1996) Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Conrad, S., Biber, D. (1999) ‘Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing.’ In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56-73. |
| Cornish, F. (2008) ‘How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and a one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 997-1018. |
| Coulthard, M. (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Longman. |
| Crystal, D., Davy, D. (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman. |
| Cysouw, M. (2005) ‘Syncretism involving clusivity.’ In: Filimonova, E. (ed.) Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 73-111. |
| Daneš, F. (1974) ‘Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text.’ In: Daneš, F. (ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia. 106-128. (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-12-20 09:49:44) |
| Daneš, F, (1995) ‘Paragraph – A central unit of the thematic and compositional build-up of texts.’ In: Warwick, B., Tanskanen, S.K., Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku. |
| Dedaíć, M. N. (2006) ‘Political speeches and persuasive argumentation.’ In: Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 700-707. |
| Dickey, E. (1997) ‘Forms of address and terms of reference.’ Journal of Linguistics 33, 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006488 |
| Donahue, R. T., Prosser, M. H. (1997) Diplomatic Discourse: International Conflict at the United Nations – Addresses and Analysis. Greenwich, CT, London: Ablex Publishing Corporation. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2007) ‘On coherence in written discourse.’ In: Schmied, J., Haase, C., Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence: Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 127-145. |
| Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2008) ‘Some functions of self-reference in diplomatic addresses.’ Discourse and Interaction 1(1), 7-24. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009a) Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions. Brno: Masaryk University. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009b) ‘Building up discourse coherence: Creating identities in political speeches.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Povolná, R. (eds) Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 97-119. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009c) ‘Words must be our force: Exploring modality markers in political speeches.’ Topics in Linguistics 4, 13-19. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2010) ‘Strategic forms of other-reference in political speeches.’ In: Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (ed.) Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2. Pragmatics of Semantically-Restricted Domains. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 79-99. |
| Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Povolná, R. (2009) ‘Cohesion and coherence in English discourse.’ In: Hůlková, I., Jančaříková, R., (eds) Exploring Cohesion and Coherence in English Discourse. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education. 5-9. |
| Dowty, D. (1991) ‘Thematic proto-roles and agreement selection.’ Language 67, 547-619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 |
| Duranti, A. (1985) ‘Sociocultural dimension of discourse.’ In: van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 273-291. |
| Duranti, A. (2006) ‘Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. Congress.’ Language in Society 35, 467-497. |
| Edge, J., Wharton, S. (2001) ‘Patterns of text in teacher education.’ In: Scott, M., Thompson, G. (eds) Patterns of Text. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 255-286. |
| Edmondson, W. (1999) ‘If coherence is achieved, then where doth meaning lie?’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 251-265. |
| Eggins, S. (2004) An Introduction to Systemic-Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum. |
| Elrich, K. (1992) ‘Scientific texts and deictic structure.’ In: Stein, D. (ed.) Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 201-231. |
| Enkvist, N. E. (1978a) ‘Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence.’ In: Östman, J-O. (ed.) Cohesion and Semantics. Reports on Text Linguistics. Åbo: Åbo Akademi. 131-143. |
| Enkvist, N. E. (1978b) ‘Felicity conditions, preferred interpretations, and disambiguations of pronominal reference in reported speech.’ In: Östman, J-O. (ed.) Cohesion and Semantics. Reports on Text Linguistics. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 183-192. |
| Enkvist, N. E. (1985) ‘Introduction: Coherence, composition and text linguistics.’ In: Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) Coherence and Composition: A Symposium. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.11-26. |
| Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman. |
| Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. |
| Fetzer, A. (2002) ‘“Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem”: Sincerity and credibility in political interviews.’ In: Chilton, P., Schäfner, C. (eds) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 173-202. |
| Fetzer, A. (2004) Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Fetzer, A. (2008) ‘Theme zones in English media discourse: Forms and functions.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 1543-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016 |
| Fetzer, A., Meierkord, C. (2002) ‘Introduction.’ In: Fetzer, A., Meierkord, C. (eds) Rethinking Sequentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1-33. |
| Fetzer, A., Weizman, E. (2006) ‘Political discourse as mediated and public discourse.’ Journal of Pragmatics 38, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014 |
| Firbas, J. (1975) ‘On the thematic and non-thematic section of the sentence.’ In: Rangbom, H. (ed.) Style and Text: Studies Presented to Nils Erik Enkvist. Stockholm: Skriptor and Turku: Åbo Akademi. |
| Firbas, J. (1987) ‘On two starting points of communication.’ In: Steel, R., Threadgold, T. (eds) Language Topics. Essays in Honour of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 23-45. |
| Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Firbas, J. (1995) ‘On the thematic and the rhematic layers of a text.’ In: Wårvik, B., Tanskanen, S.-K., Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia 14. Turku: University of Turku. 59-72. |
| Flowerdew, L. (2008) Corpus-Based Analysis of the Problem-Solution Pattern. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the News. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Francis, G. (1987) Anaphoric Nouns. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. |
| Francis, G. (1994) ‘Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion.’ In: Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London, New York: Routledge. 83-101. |
| Frawley, W. (1992) Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
| Fries, P. (1995) ‘A personal view of theme.’ In: Ghadessy, M. (ed.) Thematic Development in English Texts. London, New York: Pinter Publishers. 1-19. |
| Geluykens, R. (1991) ‘Information flow in English conversation: A new approach to the Given-New distinction.’ In: Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. |
| Geluykens, R. (1994) The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora: Evidence from Conversational Repair. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. |
| Geluykens, R. (1999) ‘It takes two to cohere: The collaborative dimension of topical coherence in conversation.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 35-53. |
| Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997) ‘Coherence cues mapping during comprehension.’ In: Costermans, J., Fayol, M. (eds) Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 3-22. |
| Ghadessy, M. (1995) ‘Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres.’ In: Ghadessy, M. (ed.) Thematic Development in English Texts. London, New York: Pinter Publishers. 129-145. |
| Giora, R. (1985) ‘Notes towards a theory of coherence.’ Poetics Today 6(4), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771962 |
| Giora, R. (1988) ‘On the informativeness requirement.’ Journal of Pragmatics 12, 547-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90048-3 |
| Giora, R. (1997) ‘Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory.’ Journal of Pragmatics 27, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00065-8 |
| Giora, R. (1998) ‘Discourse coherence is an independent notion: A response to Deirdre Wilson.’ Journal of Pragmatics 29, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00045-3 |
| Givón, T. (1982) ‘Evidentiality and epistemic space.’ Studies in Language 6(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv |
| Givón, T. (1983) ‘Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction.’ In: Givón, T. (ed.) Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3-41. |
| Givón, T. (1995) ‘Coherence in text vs coherence in mind.’ In: Gernsbacher, M. A., Givón, T. (eds) Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 59-116. |
| Givón, T. (2001) Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| Givón, T. (2005) Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor. |
| Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| Gosden, H. (1993) ‘Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles.’ Applied Linguistics 14(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.1.56 |
| Gough, V., Talbot, M. (1996) ‘“Guilt over games boys play.” Coherence as a focus for examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C., Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. 214-230. |
| Grice, P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. L. (eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58. |
| Gundel, J. K., Fretheim, T. (2006) ‘Topic and focus.’ In: Horn, L. R., Ward, G. (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell. 175-196. |
| Gutwinski, W. (1976) Cohesion in Literary Texts: A Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse. The Hague: Mouton. |
| Hajičová, E. (1993) ‘Issues of sentence structure and discourse patterns.’ In: Theoretical and Computational Linguistics. Vol 2. Prague: Charles University Press. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1970) ‘Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English.’ Foundations of Language 6, 322-361. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1971) ‘Linguistic function and literary style.’ In: Freeman, D. C. (ed.) Essays in Modern Stylistics. London, New York: Methuen. 325-361. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1974) ‘The place of functional sentence perspective in the system of language description.’ In Daneš, F. (ed.) Papers of Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia. 43-53. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. |
| Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) ‘Functions of language.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 15-28. |
| Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. New York: Longman. |
| Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Halmari, H. (2005) ‘In search of “successful” political persuasion: A comparison of the styles of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.’ In: Halmari, H., Virtanen, T. (eds) Persuasion Across Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 105-134. |
| Harris, S. (1995) ‘Pragmatics and Power.’ Journal of Pragmatics 29, 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00008-3 |
| Hasan, R. (1984) ‘Coherence and cohesive harmony.’ In: Flood, J. (ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. 181-219. |
| Hasan, R. (1989a) ‘The texture of a text.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 70-96. |
| Hasan, R. (1989b) ‘The structure of a text.’ In: Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 52-69. |
| Havránek, B. (1983) ‘The functional differentiation of Standard language.’ In: Vachek, J. (ed.) Pragiana. Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Praha: Academia. 143-164. |
| Hatim, B. (1997) Communication Across Cultures. Translation Theory and Contrastive Text Linguistics. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. |
| Hellman, C. (1995) ‘The notion of coherence in discourse.’ In: Rickheit, G., Habel, S. (eds) Focus and Coherence in Discourse Processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 190-202. |
| Helmbrecht, J. (2002) ‘Grammar and function of we.’ In: Duzsak, A. (ed.) Us and Others. Amsterdam: John Bemjamins. 31-50. |
| Herring, S. (1999) ‘Interactional coherence in CMC.’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html. |
| Hobbs, J. R. (1979) ‘Coherence and coreference.’ Cognitive Science 3, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4 |
| Hobbs, J. R. (1983) ‘Why is discourse coherent.’ In: Neubauer, F. (ed.) Coherence in Natural Language Texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag. |
| Hobbs, J. R. (1985) ‘On the coherence and structure of discourse.’ Report No CSLI 58-37. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford: Stanford University. |
| Hobbs, J. R. (1990) Literature and Cognition. CSLI Lecture Notes 21. Stanford: Stanford University. |
| Hodge, R., Kress, G. (1993) Language as Ideology. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Hoey, M. (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen and Unwin. |
| Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Hoey, M. (1996) ‘A clause-relational analysis of selected dictionary entries.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. 150-165. |
| Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Hoey, M. (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. |
| Holmes, J. (1995) Men, Women and Politeness. London: Longman. |
| Honohan, I. (2008) ‘Metaphors of solidarity.’ In: Carver, T., Pikalo, J. (eds) Political Language and Metaphor. London, New York: Routledge. 69-82. |
| Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Hunston, S. (1999) ‘Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts.’ In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 176-207. |
| Hunston, S. (2007) ‘Using corpus to investigate stance quantitavely and qualitatively.’ In: Englebretson, T. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27-48. |
| Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse. London, New York: Continuum. |
| Hymes, D. (1974) Foundations in Sociolinguistics. An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. |
| Ide, S. (1989) ‘Formal forms and discernement: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politreness.’ Multilingua 8(2/3), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 |
| Jakobson, R. (1990[1960]) ‘The speech event and the functions of language.’ In: Jakobson, R. On Language. London, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 69-79. |
| Jaworski, A., Galasinski, D. (2000) ‘Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates.’ Discourse Stiudies 2(1), 35-53. |
| Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., Lentz, L. (2008) ‘Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out.’ Discourse Processes 45, 323-345. |
| Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., Lentz, L., Zwaan, R. (2008) ‘The forewarning effect of coherence markers in persuasive discourse: Evidence from persuasion and processing.’ Discourse Processes 45, 545-579. |
| Kehler, A. (2002) Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford: Stanford University. |
| Kehler, A. (2004) ‘Discourse coherence.’ In : Horn, L. R., Ward, G. (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden, Oxford, Carlton : Blackwell. |
| Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Komlósi, L. (1989) ‘Connectedness and discourse structure: Perspectice semantics of predications and coherence of discourse.’ In: Conte, M.-E., Petöfi, J., Sözer, E. (eds) Text and Discourse Connectedness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 427-440. |
| Kovalyova, N. (2005) ‘Presidential inaugural addresses: A study in a genre development.’ In: Skaffari, J., Peokola, M., Carrol, R., Hiltunen, R., Wårvik, B. (eds) Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 39-52. |
| Kristeva, J. (1969) Sémiotique. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil. |
| Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| Langacker, R. (1990) ‘Subjectification.’ Cognitive Linguistics 1(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 |
| Lautamatti, L. (1978) ‘Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse.’ In: Enkvist, N. E., Kohonen, V. (eds) Text Linguistics, Cognitive Learning and Language Teaching. Helsinki: Akateeminen kirjakauppa. 71-104. |
| Lautamatti, L. (1982) ‘Coherence in spoken and written discourse.’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 5, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S033258650000086X |
| Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York: Longman. |
| Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1994) A Communicative Grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman. |
| Lenk, U. (1998a) ‘Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation.’ Journal of Pragmatics 30, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00027-7 |
| Lenk, U. (1998b) Marking Discourse Coherence. Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. |
| Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Levinson, S. (2000) Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. |
| Levinson, S. (2004) ‘Deixis.’ In: Horn, L. (ed.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 97-121. |
| Lindeberg, A.-C. (1985) ‘Cohesion, coherence patterns, and EFL essay evaluation.’ In: Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) Coherence and Composition: A Symposium. Åbo: Åbo Akademi. 67-92. |
| Lindquist, L. (1989) ‘Coherence in scientific texts.’ In: Heydrich, W., Neubasuer, F., Petöfi, J., Sözer, E. (eds) Connexity and Coherence. Analysis of Text and Discourse. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. 122-149. |
| Longacre, R. E. (1979) ‘The paragraph as a grammatical unit.’ In: Givón, T. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press. |
| Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Maingeuneau, D. (2002) ‘Analysis of an academic genre’. Discourse Studies 4(3), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040030401 |
| Mann, W. C., Thompson, S. A. (1988) ‘Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization.’ Text 8(3), 243-281. |
| Martin, J. R. (1985) ‘Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis.’ In: Benson, J., Graves, W. (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 248-274. |
| Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Martin, J. R. (1999) ‘Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English.’ In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 142-175. |
| Martin, J. R. (2001) ‘Cohesion and texture.’ In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. 35-53. |
| Martin, J. R., Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse. Meaning Beyond the Clause. London, New York: Continuum. |
| Martin, J. R., White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London, New York: Palgrave. |
| Mateucci, A. (2001) ‘Language and diplomacy – A practitioner’s view.’ In: Kurbalija, J., Slavik, H. (eds) Language and Diplomacy. DiploProjects. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies. 55-65. |
| Mathesius, V. (1966 [1982]) ‘Řeč a sloh.’ In: Mathesius, V. Jazyk, kultura a slovesnost. Praha: Odeon. 92-146. |
| Meierkord, C., Fetzer, A. (2002) ‘Introduction.’ In: Meierkord, C., Fetzer, A. (eds) Rethinking Sequentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| Mey, J. (1991) ‘Text, context and social control.’ Journal of Pragmatics 16, 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90133-I |
| Mey, J. (2001) Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| Minsky, M. (1975) ‘A framework for representing knowledge.’ In: Winston, P. H. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 85-98. |
| Miššíková, G. (2007) Analysing Translation as Text and Discourse. Praha: JTP. |
| Mühlhäusler, P., Harré, R. (1990) Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. |
| Ng, S. H., Bradac, J. J. (1993) Power in Language. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage. |
| Nwogu, K., Bloor, T. (1991) ‘Thematic progression in professional and popular medical text.’ In: Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 369-384. |
| Palmer, F. (1986) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Palmer, F. (2003) ‘Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues.’ In: Facchinetti, R., Krug, M., Palmer, F. (eds) Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-17. |
| Papafragou, A. (2000) ‘On “speech-act modality”.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32, 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00062-4 |
| Pípalová, R. (2008a) ‘Exploring paragraphs from the outside.’ Discourse and Interaction 1(1), 99-114. |
| Pípalová, R. (2008b) Thematic Organization of Paragraphs and Higher Text Units. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická fakulta. |
| Piwek, P., Beun, R.-J., Cremers, A. (2008) ‘“Proximal”’ and “distal” in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 694–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001 |
| Poldauf, I. (1964) ‘The third syntactical plan.’ In: Travaux Linguistic de Prague. Vol. 1. Prague: Academia. 241-255. |
| Povolná, R. (2006) ‘Interaction in spoken discourse.’ In: Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 2. Brno: Masaryk University. 131-142. |
| Povolná, R. (2007) “Aspects of coherence in spoken discourse.” In: Schmied, J., Haase, C., Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence: Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 107-125. |
| Prosser, M. H. (1970) Sow the Wind, Reap the Whirlwind: Heads of State Address the United Nations. New York: William Morrow. |
| Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. |
| Reinhart, T. (1980) ‘Conditions for text coherence.’ Poetics Today 1(4), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771893 |
| Ribera, J. (2007) ‘Text deixis in narrative sequences.’ IJES 7(1), 149-168. |
| Sacks H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. (1978) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.’ In: Schenkein, J. (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press. 1-55. |
| Sanders, T., Noordman, L. (2000) ‘The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing.’ Discourse Processes 29(1), 37-60. |
| Sanders, T., Spooren, W., Noordman, L. (1992) ‘Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations.’ Discourse Processes 15, 1-35. |
| Sanders, T, Spooren, W. (1999) ‘Communicative intentions and coherence relations.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 235-250. |
| Sanders, T., Spooren, W. (2009) ‘The cognition of discourse coherence.’ In: Renkema, J. (ed.) Discourse, Of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 197-212. |
| Sarangi, S. (2004) ‘Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments.’ Text 24(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.011 |
| Schegloff, E. A. (1990) ‘On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction.’ In: Dorval, B. (ed.) Conversational Organization and its Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. 51-77. |
| Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford : Blackwell. |
| Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. (2001) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell. |
| Schmied, J. (2007) ‘Complexity and coherence in English student writing.’ In: Schmied, J., Haase, C., Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence. Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 13-30. |
| Scott, M., Johns, T., Murison-Bowie, S. (1993) MicroConcord (Program and Manual). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Searle, J. (1975) ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts.’ In: Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 344-369. |
| Searle, J. (1991) ‘Indirect speech acts.’ In: Davis, S. (ed.) Pragmatics. A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 265-277. |
| Seidlhofer, B., Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in summary: The contexts of appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219. |
| Sgall, P. (1994) ‘Meaning, reference and discourse patterns.’ In: Luelsdorff, P. (ed.) Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Shen, Y., Balaban, N. (1999) ‘Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse.’ Discourse Processes 28(2), 139-153. |
| Short, M. (1996) Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London, New York: Longman. |
| Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (1997) ‘Modal (un)certainty in political discourse: A functional account.’ Language Sciences, 19(4), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00068-X |
| Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London, New York: Routledge. |
| Sinclair, J., Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Sopory, P. (2008) ‘Metaphor and intra-attitudinal coherence.’ Communication Studies 59(2), 164-181. |
| Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, H., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., Wilson, D. (2010) ‘Epistemic vigilance.’ Mind & Language 25, 359-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x |
| Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Swales, J. M. (2004) Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Taboada, M. T. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Taboada, M. T. (2006) ‘Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations.’ Journal of Pragmatics 38, 567-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.010 |
| Taboada, M. T. (2009) ‘Implicit and explicit coherence relations.’ In: Renkema, J. (ed.) Discourse, Of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 127-140. |
| Tannen, D. (1985) ‘Cross-cultural communication.’ In: van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. 4. London: Academic Press. 203-215. |
| Tanskanen, S.-K. (2004) ‘Cohesion and collaboration: Patterns of cohesion in spoken and written dialogue.’ In: Aijmer, K., Stentröm, A.-B. (eds) Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 89-110. |
| Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) Collaborating Towards Coherence. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. |
| Tárnyiková, J. (1995) Chapters from Modern English Syntax II. (Text Perspective). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. |
| Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Texture to Text. Olomouc: Univezita Palackého, 3rd ed. |
| Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. Learning About Language. London, New York: Longman. |
| Thompson, G., Hunston, S. (1999) ‘Evaluation: An introduction.’ In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-27. |
| Thompson, G., Zhou, J. (1999) ‘Evaluation in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts.’ In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 121-141. |
| Thompson, S. (1994) ‘Cohesion in monologue.’ Applied Linguistics 15(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.1.58 |
| Tomlin, R., Forrest, L., Pu, M., Kim, M. (1997) ‘Discourse semantics.’ In: van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. Vol. 1. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. |
| Townsend, D. (1997) ‘Processing clauses and their relationships during comprehension.’ In: Costermans, J., Fayol, M. (eds) Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 265-281. |
| Trosborg, A. (1997) Rhetorical Strategies in Legal Language. Discourse Analysis of Statutes and Contracts. Tübingen: Gunther Narr. |
| Trosborg, A. (2000) ‘The inaugural address.’ In: Analysing Professional Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 112-145. |
| Urbanová, L. (2003) On Expressing Meaning in English Conversation. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. |
| Urbanová, L. (2008) Stylistika anglického jazyka. Brno: Barrister & Principal. |
| Urbanová, L., Oakland, A. (2002) Úvod do anglické stylistiky. Brno: Barrister & Principal. |
| Vachek, J. (1976) ‘Two chapters on written English.’ In: Vachek, J. Selected Writings in English and General Linguistics. Prague: Academia. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1977) Text and Context. London: Longman. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1980a) Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1980b) ‘The semantics and pragmatics of functional coherence in discourse’. Versus 26/27: 49-65. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1990) ‘The future of the field: Discourse analysis in the 1990s.’ Text 10(12), 133-156. |
| van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis.’ Discourse and Society 4 (2), 249-283. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1995) ‘On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van Dijk Theory.’ In: Weaver, C. A., Mannes, S., Fletcher, C. K. (eds) Discourse Comprehension. Essays in Honour of Walter Kitsch. Hillsdale, NJ, Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum. 383-410. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘Cognitive context models and discourse.’ In: Stamenov, M. (ed.) Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 189-226. |
| van Dijk, T. A. (2002) ‘Political discourse and political cognition’. In: Chilton, P. A., Schäffner C. (eds) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 204-236 |
| van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York, London: Academic Press. |
| van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The Representation of Social Actors.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, R., Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 32-70. |
| van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.’ Discourse and Communication 1(1), 91-112. |
| van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity.’ Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009 |
| Verstraete, J.-C. (2001) ‘Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system.’ Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1505-1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7 |
| Virtanen, T., Halmari, H. (2005) ‘Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives.’ In: Halmari, H., Virtanen, T. (eds) Persuasion Across Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3-24. |
| Wales, K. (1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Watts, R. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Weber, J. J. (1992) Critical Analysis of Fiction: Essays in Discourse Stylistics. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi. |
| Widdowson, H. (1978) Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Widdowson, H. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell. |
| Widdowson, H. (2007) ‘Text and real language.’ Topics in Linguistics 1, 4-7. |
| Wieczorek, A. (2009) ‘In-group and out-group markers in the service of political legitimisation: A critical-methodological account.’ In: Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (ed.) Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Vol. 2. Pragmatics of Semantically-Restricted Domains. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 65-78. |
| Wikborg, E. (1985) ‘Types of coherence breaks in university student writing.’ In: Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) Coherence and Composition: A Symposium. Åbo: Åbo Akademi. 93-133. |
| Wilamová, S. (2006) ‘Motivation and impact of context-sensitive politeness strategies.’ In: Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 2. Brno: Masaryk University. 203-213. |
| Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| Wilson, J. (2001) ‘Political Discourse.’ In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D, Hamilton, H. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishing. 398-415. |
| Winter, E. (1994) ‘Clause relations as information structure: Two basic text structures in English.’ In: Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London, New York: Routledge. 46-68. |
| Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse, London: Longman. |
| Wodak, R. (2007) ‘Discourse in European Union organizations: Aspects of access, participation and exclusion.’ Text and Talk 27(5/6), 655-680. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.030 |
| Wodak, R. (2008) ‘Introduction: Discourse studies – Important concepts and terms.’ In: Wodak, R., Krzyźanowski, M. (eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 1-29. |
| Wodak, R., Chilton, P. (eds) (2005) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| Zapletalová, G. (2009) Academic Discourse and the Genre of Research Article. Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Biela a Filozofická fakulta Ostravské university. |