Přepnout na evidenci publikací, které mě citují.
DONTCHEVA-NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Olga, Renata JANČAŘÍKOVÁ, Gabriela MIŠŠÍKOVÁ a Renata POVOLNÁ. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse. 1., elektronické vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2017, 166 s. Spisy Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, sv. 158. ISBN 978-80-210-8857-3. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8857-2017.
Bibliografie
Aijmer, K. (1996) Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London, New York: Longman.
Aijmer, K. (2002) English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Vol. 10. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10
Aktas. R. and Cortes, V. (2008) ‘Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7/1, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (translated by McGee, V. W.) Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Barack Obama, Inaugural address, 2009
Barack Obama, victory speech, Election Day, 2008
Bates, S. (2009, March 28) ‘Teenager given 14 years for murder after trivial row led to ‘horrific’ attack.’ The Guardian, p. 8.
Bazerman, C. (2004) ‘Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts.’ In: Bazerman, C. and Prior, P. (eds) What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers. 83-96.
Bazzanella, C. and Damiano, R. (1999) ‘Coherence and misunderstanding in everyday conversation.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 175-187.
Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. U. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Bell, A. (1991) The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bennett, K. (2009) ‘English academic style manuals: A survey.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.12.003
Bhatia, V. A. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. A. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Black, E. (2006) Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Booth, W. (1961) The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Britten, N. (2006, November 3) ‘Life for father who killed girl to pay back for wife’s infidelity.’ The Daily Telegraph, p. 1, 3.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bryson, B. (1995) Notes from a Small Island. London: Transworld Publishers Ltd. (BB)
Bublitz, W. (1988) Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bublitz, W. (1988) Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Discourse Topics and Topical Actions. Participant Roles and ‘Recipient’ Action on a Particular Type of Everyday Conversation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views of coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7.
Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views of coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7.
Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views on coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7.
Bublitz, W. (1999) ‘Introduction: Views on coherence.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-7.
Bublitz, W. and Lenk, U. (1999) ‘Disturbed coherence: “Fill me in”.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 153-174.
Bunyan, N. (2008, September 24) ‘Life for mother who drowned disabled girl.’ The Daily Telegraph, p. 13.
Burgess, M. (1996) Junk. London: Penguin (BM)
Carvel, J., Butler, P. (2009, March 11) ‘Mother jailed for eight years after horrific cruelty to baby son, aged two months.’ The Guardian, p. 14.
Clark, B. (2009) ‘The place near the thing where we went that time: An inferential approach to pragmatic stylistics.’ Topics in Linguistics: Interface between Pragmatics and Other Linguistic Disciplines 3/2009, 4-11.
Clench, J. (2006, November 9) ‘BARBARIC.’ (p. 1); ‘You animals.’ The Sun, p. 8.7
Clench, J. (2009, March 11) ‘Crack addict tortured her baby until he died ... and she’ll be out in just 4yrs.’ The Sun, p. 19.
Clench, J. (2009, March 28) ‘Thug who murdered Jimmy, 16, given life.’ Retrieved April 3, 2010, from www.thesun.co.uk.
Clyne, M. (1987) ‘Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts: English and German.’ Journal of Pragmatics 11, 211-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90196-2
Cook, G. (1994) Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cornish, F. (2008) ‘How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and a neo-Gricean account of indexical reference.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 997-1018.
Cornish, F. (2008) ‘How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and a one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 997-1018.
Crystal, D. (1995) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Crystal, D. and Davy, D. (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman.
Crystal, D. and Davy, D. (1975) Advanced Conversational English. London: Longman.
Čmejrková, S. and Daneš, F. (1997) ‘Academic writing and cultural identity: The case of Czech academic writing.’ In: Duzsak, A. (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 40-62.
Daneš, F. (1974) ‘Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text.’ In: Daneš, F. (ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia. 106-128.
Daneš, F. (1995) ‘Paragraph – A central unit of the thematic and compositional build-up of texts.’ In: Warwick, B., Tanskanen, S. K. and Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku. 29-40.
David Cameron, leader’s speech, Conservative Party conference, Manchester 2011
De Lillo, D. (1997) Underworld. New York: Scribner (DLD)
Dedaíć, M. N. (2006) ‘Political speeches and persuasive argumentation.’ In: Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 700-707.
Derrida, J. (1980) ‘The law of genre.’ Critical Inquiry 7, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1086/448088
Diller, H. J. (2002) ‘Genre vs. text types: Two typologies and their uses for the newspaper reader.’ In: Fischer, A., Tottie, G. and Lehman, H. M. (eds) Text Types and Corpora. Tübingen: Narr. 1-16.
Dislay, J. (2006, October 17) ‘ ‘Little star’ Joe was killed by a 14-year-old boy in a calculating murder ... So why was he jailed for only 12 years.’ (p.1); ‘Lured to his death by gay killer letter.’ The Daily Mirror, p. 4.
Disley, J. (2008, September 24) ‘What she did to my princess was evil.’ The Daily Mirror, p. 17.
Donahue, R. T. and Prosser, M. H. (1997) Diplomatic Discourse: International Conflict at the United Nations – Addresses and Analysis, Greenwich, CT, London: Ablex.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2001) Coherence in Political Speeches. Brno: Masaryk University.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2004) ‘Situational characteristics of the discourse of international governmental organizations: UNESCO resolutions and declarations.’ Acta Academica Karviniensia. 1/2004. Karviná: SUO OPF v Karviné. 25-41.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2005) Grammatical Structures in English: Meaning in Context. Brno: Masaryk University.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2007) ‘On coherence in written discourse.’ In: Schmied, J., Haase, C. and Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence. Approaches to Linguistics Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 127-145.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2007) ‘On coherence in written discourse.’ In: Schmied, J., Haase, C. and Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence: Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 127-145.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009) Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions. Brno: Masaryk University.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2011) Coherence in Political Speeches. Brno: Masaryk University.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2011) Coherence in Political Speeches. Brno: Masaryk University.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012) ‘Cross-cultural differences in the construal of authorial voice in the genre of diploma theses.’ In: Berkenkotter, C., Bhatia, V. K. and Gotti, M. (eds) Insights into Academic Genres. 301-328.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012) ‘Understanding and believing: Interpreting pragmatic meanings in political discourse.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 79-111.
Douthwaite, J. (2000) Towards a Linguistic Theory of Foregrounding. Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.
Duranti, A. 2006, ‘Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. Congress.’ Language in Society 35, 467-497.
Duszak, A. (1997) ‘Cross-cultural academic communication: A discourse-community view.’ In: Duzsak, A. (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 11-39.
Dušková, L., Strnadová, Z., Knittlová, D., Peprník, J. and Tárnyiková, J. (1988) Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia.
Edmondson, J. W. (1981) Spoken Discourse. A Model for Analysis. London, New York: Longman.
Elrich, K. (1992) ‘Scientific texts and deictic structure.’ In: Stein, D. (1992) Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 201-231.
Erman, B. (1986) ‘Some pragmatic expressions in English conversation.’ In: Tottie, G. and Bäcklund, I. (eds) English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. 131-147.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Hodder Education.
Fairclough, N. (2010) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Federico Mayor Zaragoza, address at the Third International Symposium of the World Heritage Cities, Bergen, 1995
Fetzer, A. (2002) ‘ “Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem”: Sincerity and credibility in political interviews.’ In: Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (eds) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 173-202.
Fish, S. E. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, Mass., London: Harvard University Press.
Flowerdew, L. (2004) ‘The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language.’ In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds) Discourse in the Professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11-33.
Flowerdew, L. (2005) ‘An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies.’ English for Specific Purposes 24, 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.09.002
Flowerdew, L. (forthcoming). ‘Grammar and the research article.’ In: Chapelle, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fowler, R. (1986) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the News. London: Routledge.
Franklin, B. (2008) ‘Newszak: Entertainment versus news and information.’ In: Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (eds) The Tabloid Culture Reader. Maidenhead: Open University Press. 13-22.
Fraser, B. (1990) ‘An approach to discourse markers.’ Journal of Pragmatics 14, 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V
Fraser, B. (1999) ‘What are discourse markers?’ Journal of Pragmatics 31, 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5
Galtung, J. (1985) ‘Struktur, Kultur und intellectueller Stil.’ In: Wierlacher, A. (ed.) Das Fremde und das Eigene. Munchen: Iudicum Verlag. 151-193.
Gammell, C. (2009, March 28) ‘Our broken society helped to kill my son.’ The Daily Telegraph, p. 13.
George W. Bush, Inaugural address, 2001
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997) ‘Coherence cues mapping during comprehension.’ In: Costermans, J. and Fayol, M. (eds) Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 3-22.
Giora, R. (1985) ‘Notes towards a theory of coherence.’ Poetics Today 6(4), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771962
Giora, R. (1997) ‘Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory.’ Journal of Pragmatics 27, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00065-8
Givón, T. (1995) ‘Coherence in text vs coherence in mind.’ In: Gernsbacher, M. A. and Givón, T. (eds) Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 59-116.
Givón, T. (2001) Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goatly, A. (2012) Meaning and Humour. Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gough, V. and Talbot, M. (1996) ‘“Guilt over games boys play.” Coherence as a focus for examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. 214-230.
Gray, B. and Cortes, V. (2011) ‘Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose.’ English for Specific Purposes 30, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004
Greenbaum, S. (1969) Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London and Harlow: Longmans, Green and Co Ltd.
Greenbaum, S. and Quirk, R. (1990) A Student’s Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Greimas, A. J. (1966) Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. (translated by McDowell, D., Schleifer, R. and Velie, A.) Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. 1983.
Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
Grice, H. P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Haberlandt, K. (1982) ‘Reader expectations in text comprehension.’ In: Le Ny, J.-F. and Kintsch, W. (eds) Language and Comprehension. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 239-249.
Haddon, M. (2004) The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. London: Vintage (HM)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London, New York: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. New York: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. New York: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language as a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halmari, H. (2005) ‘In search of “successful” political persuasion: A comparison of the styles of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan.’ In: Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds) Persuasion Across Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 105-134.
Harwood, N. (2005) ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics 26, 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
Hasan, R. (1984) ‘Coherence and cohesive harmony.’ In: Flook, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension. Delaware: International Reading Association. 181-219.
Hasan, R. (1989) ‘The texture of a text.’ In: Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language as a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 70-96.
Hewings (2006) Academic Writing in Context. London, New York: Continuum.
Hewings, M. and Hewings, A. (2002) ‘It is interesting to note that …’: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing.’ English for Specific Purposes 21, 367-383.
Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoey, M. (1996) ‘A clause-relational analysis of selected dictionary entries.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices. London, New York: Routledge. 150-165.
Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Routledge.
Honohan, I. (2008) ‘Metaphors of solidarity.’ In: Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (eds) Political Language and Metaphor. London, New York: Routledge. 69-82.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S. (1999) ‘Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts.’ In: Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 176-207.
Hunston, S. (2007) ‘Using corpus to investigate stance quantitavely and qualitatively.’ In: Englebretson, T. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27-48.
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. (1999) Pattern Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hunston, S. and Sinclair, J. (2000). ‘A local grammar of evaluation.’ In: Hunston, S. and Thompson. G. (eds) Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–101.
Hyland, K. (1998): Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (2001) ‘Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles.’ English for Specific Purposes 18, 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002) ‘Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing.’ Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
Hyland, K. (2005) ‘Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.’ Discourse Studies 7/2, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse. London, New York: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2010) Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication 24/2, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846
Chamonikolasová, J. (2005) ‘Comparing the structures of academic texts written in English and Czech.’ In: Huttová, A. et al. (eds) Slovak Studies in English 1. Bratislava: Comenius University. 77-84.
Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse. London, New York: Routledge.
Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. (1997) ‘Discourse and politics.’ In: van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. 206-230.
Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jakobson, R. (1960) ‘Closing statement, linguistics and poetics.’ In: Weber, J. J. (ed.) The Stylistics Reader: From Roman Jakobson to the Present. 10-35.
Jančaříková, R. (2009) ‘Newspaper reporting: Cohesive devices as means contributing to the effectiveness of news.’ In: Hůlková, I. and Jančaříková, R. (eds) Exploring Cohesion and Coherence in English Discourse. Third Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English. Brno: Masaryk University. 109-119.
Jančaříková, R. (2012) ‘On construction of high/low social status in crime reports.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation. Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 113-130.
Jewkes, Y. (2004) Media and Crime. London: Sage Publications.
Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y. (1998) ‘Discourse markers: Introduction.’ In: Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y. (eds) Discourse Markers. Description and Theory. Pragmatics & Beyond. New Series. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-12.
Kehler, A. (2002) Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford: Stanford University.
Kikuchi, S. (2007) ‘Performative hypothesis of literary discourse.’ In: Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA). [http:// www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2007/kikuchi2007.pdf]
Komlósi, L. I. (2012) ‘Linguistic context, pragmatic context, mental context: Meaning construction and interpretation via contextualization.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation. Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 19-40.
Kortmann, B. (1991) Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English. London: Routledge.
Kovalyova, N. (2005) ‘Presidential inaugural addresses: A study in a genre development.’ In: Skaffari, J., Peokola, M., Carrol, R., Hiltunen, R. and Wĺrvik, B. (eds) Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 39-52.
Kuo, C.-H. (1999) ‘The use of personal pronouns: role relation­ships in scientific journal articles.’ English for Specific Pur­poses 18/2, 121-138.
Labov, W. (1972) Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. and Short, M. (2007) Style in Fiction. Pearson: Longman.
Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1994) A Communicative Grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
Leech, G., Deuchar, M., Hoogenraad, R. (1982) English Grammar for Today. A New Introduction. London, Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Lenk, U. (1995) ‘Discourse markers and conversational coherence.’ In: Wårvik, B., Tanskanen, S.-K. and Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Anglicana Turkuensia 14. Turku: University of Turku. 341-352.
Lenk, U. (1998) ‘Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation.’ Journal of Pragmatics 30, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00027-7
Lesley, J. and McIntire, D. (2010) Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lessing, D. (1993) London Observed. Stories and Sketches. London: Hammersmith (LD)
Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malá, M. (2006) ‘Contrastive markers and dialogicality.’ In: Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 2. Brno: Masaryk University. 97-107.
Martin Luther King, address at March on Washington, 1963
Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London, New York: Palgrave.
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Painter, C. (1997). Working with Functional Grammar. London:Arnold.
Mauranen, A. (1993) ‘Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts.’ English for Specific Purposes 12, 3-22.
McMahon, B. (2006) ‘Stylistics: Pragmatic approaches.’ In: Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. 232-236.
Mey, J. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell.
Mey, J. (2001) Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, J. L. (2001) Pragmatics. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Mey, J. L. (ed.) (1998) Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Miall, D. S. (2002) ‘Literary discourse.’ In: Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M. A. and Goldman, S. R. (eds) Handbook of Discourse Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 321-355.
Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English, http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micase/
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1, Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 85-97.
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Sborník prací Pedagogické fakulty Masarykovy univerzity. Vol. 187. Brno: Masaryk University. 85-97.
Miššíková, G. (2005) ‘Background knowledge in interpretation of discourse.’ In: Povolná, R. and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 1. Brno Seminar on Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings 2005. Brno: Masaryk University. 85-98.
Miššíková, G. (2007) Analysing Translation as Text and Discourse. Praha: Jednota tlumočníků a překladatelů.
Miššíková, G. (2009) ‘Pragmatic dimensions in literary text: A comparative perspective.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná R. (eds) Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 184-199.
Miššíková, G. (2011) ‘Interfaces in linguistic theory and practice: A pragmatic approach to literary translation analysis.’ In: Hornsby, D. (ed.) Interfaces in Language 2. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 137-152.
Miššíková, G. (2012) ‘Cooperation and politeness in literary discourse: A pragmatic stylistic approach.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, O. (eds) Discourse Interpretation. Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 149-162.
Mur-Dueňas, P. (2008) ‘Analysing engagement markers cross-culturally: The case of English and Spanish business management research articles.’ In: Burgess, S. and Martín-Martín, P. (eds) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication. Vol. 61. Bern: Peter Lang. 197-213.
Nöth, W. (1995) Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Perrie, R. (2008, March 6) ‘Dad gets life for murder of son, 4.’ The Sun, p. 23
Piwek, P., Beun, R-J., Cremers, A., 2008. ‘“Proximal” and “distal” in language and cognition: evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40, 694–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001
Povolná, R. (2007) ‘Aspects of coherence in spoken discourse.’ In: Schmied, J., Haase, C. and Povolná, R. (eds) Complexity and Coherence: Approaches to Linguistic Research and Language Teaching. REAL Studies 3. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 107-125.
Povolná, R. (2008) ‘Why are there so many labels for discourse markers?’ Discourse and Interaction 1/1, 115-124.
Povolná, R. (2009) ‘Exploring interactive discourse markers in academic spoken discourse.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 60-80.
Povolná, R. (2009) ‘Exploring interactive discourse markers in academic spoken discourse.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 60-80.
Povolná, R. (2010) ‘Can non-native speakers of English use contrastive discourse markers correctly when writing academic texts?’ In: Adam, M., Brůhová, G., Čermák, F., Čermák, J., Klégr, A., Kocourek, R., Mair, C., Malá, M., Pípalová, R., Povolná, R., Smolka, V., Štekauer, P., Urbanová, L. and Volín, J. …for thy speech bewrayeth thee. A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze. 209-231.
Povolná, R. (2010) Interactive Discourse Markers in Spoken Discourse. Brno: Masaryk University.
Povolná, R. (2010) Interactive Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Brno: Masaryk University.
Povolná, R. (2012) ‘Cross-cultural differences in the use of discourse markers by Czech and German students of English in the genre of Master’s theses.’ In: Berkenkotter, C., Bhatia, V. K. and Gotti, M. (eds) Insights into Academic Genres. Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication. Vol. 160. Bern: Petr Lang. 329-351.
Povolná, R. (2012) ‘Enhancing coherent interpretation in academic written discourse.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 179-208.
Povolná, R. (2012) ‘Enhancing coherent interpretation in academic written discourse: Cross-cultural variation in the use of discourse markers.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 179-208.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Reah, D. (2002) The Language of Newspapers. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Ribera, J. (2007) ‘Text deixis in narrative sequences.’ IJES 7(1), 149-168.
Richardson, J. E. (2007) Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rubenfeld, J. (2006) The Interpretation of Murder. London: Headline Review (RJ)
Safir, K. (2005) ‘Abandoning coreference’ In: Bermudez J. L. (ed.) Thought, Reference and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110-155.
Sarangi, S. (2004) ‘Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments.’ Text 24(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.011
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. (1999) ‘Coherence in summary: The contexts of appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in summary: The contexts of appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
Seidlhofer, B. and Widdowson, H. G. (1997) ‘Coherence in summary: The contexts of appropriate discourse.’ In: Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg 1997. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
Schank, R. C. (1982) Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, D. (2001) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell.
Schmid, H. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmidt, S. J. (1982) Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literature: The Components of a Basic Theory. (translated by Beaugrande, R. de) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Schmied, W. (2010) Narratology. An Introduction. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (1997) ‘Modal (un)certainty in political discourse: A functional account.’ Language Science, 19(4), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00068-X
Simpson, A. (2009, March 11) ‘Young mother jailed over “horrific” cruelty campaign against two-month-old son.’ Retrieved March 20, 2009, from www.telegraph.co.uk.
Sperber, D. and Deirdre, W. (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, H., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D. (2010) ‘Epistemic vigilance.’ Mind and Language 25, 359-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Stašková, S. (2005) ‘Options of identity: Authorial presence in research article abstracts.’ In: Huttová, A. et al. (eds) Slovak Studies in English 1. Bratislava: Comenius University. 201-207.
Stenström, A.-B. (1990) ‘Lexical items peculiar to spoken discourse.’ In: Svartvik, J. (ed.) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Description and Research. Lund Studies in English 82. Lund: Lund University Press. 137-175.
Stenström, A.-B. (1994) An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.
Stenström, A.-B. (1995) ‘Some remarks on comment clauses.’ In: Aarts, B. and Meyer, C. F. (eds) The Verb in Contemporary English. Theory and Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290-301.
Stockwell, P. (2006) ‘Language and literature: Stylistics.’ In: Arts, B. and McMahon, A. (eds) The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 742-758.
Stokes, P. (2008, March 6) ‘Man who killed his son in revenge for wife’s affair gets life.’ The Daily Telegraph, p. 5.
Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Svartvik, J. and Leech, G. (1995) One Tongue, Many Voices. Palgrave Macmillan.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004) Research Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swan, M. (2006) Practical English Usage. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taboada, M. (2006) ‘Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations.’ Journal of Pragmatics 38/4, 567-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.010
Tanskanen, S.-K. (1995) ‘Lexical cohesion meets communicative conditions.’ In: Warwick, B., Tanskanen, S.-K and Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Anglicana Turkensia 14, 531-538.
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) Collaborating Towards Coherence Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006) Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tárnyiková, J. (1995) Chapters from Modern English Syntax II. (Text Perspective). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Text to Texture. An Introduction to Processing Strategies. 3rd ed. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Text to Texture. An Introduction to Processing Strategies. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Texture to Text. 3rd ed. Olomouc: Univezita Palackého.
Tárnyiková, J. (2002) From Texture to Text. 3rd ed. Olomouc: Univezita Palackého.
Temple, M. (2008) The British Press. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Tony Blair, resignation speech, 2007
Toolan, M. (1998) Language in Literature. An Introduction to Stylistics. London: Arnold.
Toolan, M. (2012) ‘Coherence.’ In: Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W., and Schönert, J. (eds) The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. [hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php​?title=Coherence​&oldid=1676; view date: 22 Oct 2012]
Trosborg, A. (2000) ‘The inaugural address.’ In: Trosborg, A. (ed.) Analysing Professional Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 112-145.
Ungerer, F. (2002) ‘When stories are no longer stories: The emergence of the top-down structure in news reports in English newspapers.’ In: Fischer, A., Tottie, G and Lehman, H. M. (eds) Text Types and Corpora. Tübingen: Narr. 91-104.
van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity.’ Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009
van Dijk T. A. (1981) Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
van Dijk, T. A. (1978) Cognitive Processing of Literary Discourse. [http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Cognitive processing of literary discourse.pdf; view date: 22 Sept 2012]
van Dijk, T. A. (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘Cognitive context models and discourse.’ In: Stamenov, M. (ed.) Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 189-226.
van Dijk, T. A. (2002) ‘Political discourse and political cognition.’ In: Chilton, P. A. and Schaffner C. (eds) Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 204-236.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006) ‘Discourse and manipulation.’ Discourse and Society 17(3), 359-383.
van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York, London: Academic Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 32-70.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication.’ Discourse and Communication 1(1), 91-112.
van Peer, W. (1989) ‘How to do things with texts: Towards a pragmatic foundation for the teaching of texts.’ In: Short, M. (ed.) Reading, Analyzing & Teaching Literature. London: Longman.
Ventola, E. and Mauranen, A. (1991) ‘Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles.’ In: Ventola, E. (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and Uses. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 457-492.
Verdonk, P. (1995) ‘Words, words, words: A pragmatic and socio-cognitive view of lexical repetition.’ In: Verdonk, P. and Weber, J. J. (eds) (1995) Twentieth-Century Fiction: From Text to Context. Routledge: London, New York. 7-31.
Verdonk, P. (2002) Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verschueren, J., Östman, J. O., Blommaert, J. (eds) (1995) Handbook of Pragmatics Manual. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vonnegut, K. (2010) Cat’s Cradle. Dial Press Trade Paperback Edition (VK)
Wagner, S. (2011) ‘Concessives and contrastives in student writing: L1, L2 and genre differences.’ In: Schmied, J. (ed.) Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives REAL Studies 5. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. 23-49.
Wales, K. (1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wales, K. (2001) A Dictionary of Stylistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Ward, V., Hanna, L. (2009, March 28) ‘STOP IT.’ The Daily Mirror, p. 4.
White, P. R. R. (2006) ‘Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse.’ In: Lassen, I., Strunck, J. and Vestergaard, T. (eds) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 37-67.
Widdowson, H. (1978) Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. G. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford UK, Malden USA: Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. G. (2012) ‘The pretext of interpretation.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation. Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 3-18.
William Clinton, State of the Union address, 1999
Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2007a) ‘Discourse in European Union organizations: Aspects of access, participation and exclusion.’ Text and Talk 27-5/6, 655-680.
Wodak, R. (2007b) ‘Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry.’ Pragmatics and Cognition 15(1), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual: The Discursive Construction and Representation of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgravre Macmillan.