KNOT, J., Petr KALA, Richard ROKYTA, J. STASEK, B. KUZMANOV, Ota HLINOMAZ, J. BĔLOHLAVEK, F. ROHAC, R. PETR, D. BILKOVA, S. DJAMBAZOV, M. GRIGOROV a P. WIDIMSKY. Comparison of outcomes in ST-segment depression and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with emergency PCI: Data from a multicentre registry. Online. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa. 2012, roč. 23, č. 9, s. 495-500. ISSN 1995-1892. [citováno 2024-04-24]
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Comparison of outcomes in ST-segment depression and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with emergency PCI: Data from a multicentre registry
Autoři KNOT, J. (203 Česká republika, garant), Petr KALA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Richard ROKYTA (203 Česká republika), J. STASEK (203 Česká republika), B. KUZMANOV (100 Bulharsko), Ota HLINOMAZ (203 Česká republika, domácí), J. BĔLOHLAVEK (203 Česká republika), F. ROHAC (203 Česká republika), R. PETR (203 Česká republika), D. BILKOVA (203 Česká republika), S. DJAMBAZOV (203 Česká republika), M. GRIGOROV (100 Bulharsko) a P. WIDIMSKY (203 Česká republika)
Vydání Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 2012, 1995-1892.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele Jižní Afrika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 0.848
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/12:00062228
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS 000311351300009
Klíčová slova anglicky Acute myocardial infarction; Coronary artery disease; Primary PCI
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. Michal Petr, učo 65024. Změněno: 8. 12. 2012 22:37.
Anotace
Traditionally, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been described as either STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) or non-STEMI myocardial infarction. This classification is historically related to the use of thrombolytic therapy, which is effective in STEMI. The current era of widespread use of coronary angiography (CAG), usually followed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) puts this classification system into question. Objectives: To compare the outcomes of patients with STEMI and ST-depression myocardial infarction (STDMI) who were treated with emergency PCI. Methods: This multicentre registry enrolled a total of 6 602 consecutive patients with AMI. Patients were divided into the following subgroups: STEMI (n = 3446), STDMI (n = 907), left bundle branch block (LBBB) AMI (n = 241), right bundle branch block (RBBB) AMI (n = 338) and other electrocardiographic (ECG) AMI (n = 1670). Baseline and angiographic characteristics were studied, and revascularisation therapies and in-hospital mortality were analysed. Results: Acute heart failure was present in 29.5% of the STDMI vs 27.4% of the STEMI patients (p < 0.001). STDMI patients had more extensive coronary atherosclerosis than patients with STEMI (three-vessel disease: 53.1 vs 30%). The left main coronary artery was an infract-related artery (IRA) in 6.0% of STDMI vs 1.1% of STEMI patients. TIMI flow 0-1 was found in 35.0% of STDMI vs 66.0% of STEMI patients. Primary PCI was performed in 88.1% of STEMI (with a success rate of 90.8%) vs 61.8% of STDMI patients (with a success rate of 94.5%) (p = 0.012 for PCI success rates). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different (STDMI 6.3 vs STEMI 5.4%, p = 0.330). Conclusion: These data suggest that similar strategies (emergency CAG with PCI whenever feasible) should be applied to both these types of AMI.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 24. 4. 2024 07:03