J 2010

Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors

POPOVICI, Vlad; Weijie CHEN; Brandon G GALLAS; Christos HATZIS; Weiwei SHI et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors

Autoři

POPOVICI, Vlad; Weijie CHEN; Brandon G GALLAS; Christos HATZIS; Weiwei SHI; Frank W SAMUELSON; Yuri NIKOLSKY; Marina TSYGANOVA; Alex ISHKIN; Tatiana NIKOLSKAYA; Kenneth R HESS; Vicente VALERO; Daniel BOOSER; Mauro DELORENZI; Gabriel N HORTOBAGYI; Leming SHI; W Fraser SYMMANS a Lajos PUSZTAI

Vydání

Breast Cancer Research, London, Great Britain, BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2010, 1465-5411

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 5.785

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne
Změněno: 4. 3. 2013 15:05, doc. Ing. Vlad Popovici, PhD

Anotace

V originále

Introduction: As part of the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II project, this analysis examines how the choice of univariate feature-selection methods and classification algorithms may influence the performance of genomic predictors under varying degrees of prediction difficulty represented by three clinically relevant endpoints. Methods: We used gene-expression data from 230 breast cancers (grouped into training and independent validation sets), and we examined 40 predictors (five univariate feature-selection methods combined with eight different classifiers) for each of the three endpoints. Their classification performance was estimated on the training set by using two different resampling methods and compared with the accuracy observed in the independent validation set. Results: A ranking of the three classification problems was obtained, and the performance of 120 models was estimated and assessed on an independent validation set. The bootstrapping estimates were closer to the validation performance than were the cross-validation estimates. The required sample size for each endpoint was estimated, and both gene-level and pathway-level analyses were performed on the obtained models. Conclusions: We showed that genomic predictor accuracy is determined largely by an interplay between sample size and classification difficulty. Variations on univariate feature-selection methods and choice of classification algorithm have only a modest impact on predictor performance, and several statistically equally good predictors can be developed for any given classification problem.