KUNDT, Radek, Aleš CHALUPA a Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ. Cultural epidemiology versus memetic transmission. In Workshop Ancient Religions and Cognition (ArCog): Transmission, London, 13-14 January 2014. 2014.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Cultural epidemiology versus memetic transmission
Autoři KUNDT, Radek (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Aleš CHALUPA (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání Workshop Ancient Religions and Cognition (ArCog): Transmission, London, 13-14 January 2014, 2014.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Prezentace na konferencích
Obor 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14210/14:00074919
Organizační jednotka Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky Cultural epidemiology; memetics; intuitive ontology; cultural attractor; transmission of cultural variants
Štítky rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. et Mgr. Radek Kundt, Ph.D., učo 42130. Změněno: 20. 1. 2014 15:50.
Anotace
Memetic authors try to consistently maintain all basic elements and rules of the neo-Darwinian theory of natural selection. However, this effort fails, because the cultural changes are not subject to these elements and rules, and subsequently cultural variants do not meet the definition of replicators. Firstly, most parts of culture do not consist of small, independent (discrete) pieces of information, so that the gene/meme metaphor might represent more than just a vague analogy. Secondly, even if it did, these entities (independent/discrete pieces) almost never create exact copies of themselves (high fidelity replications) in cultural transmission, which makes cumulative cultural evolution impossible, because it effectively removes the effects of natural selection from the game. Cultural epidemiology argues that the emergence and transmission of cultural variants may be caused by the imitation of behaviour, but if we look at the process more closely, we find out, that it is a transformation rather than true replication. This is because while one cultural variant induces in one mind one kind of behaviour, the spectator of this behaviour, who tries to imitate the same kind of action, is able to do so by creating in his mind a cultural variant that is completely different from the original. The new product is a mixture of something preserved and of something newly constructed, which is shaped to fit the capacities, needs and interests of the transmitter. D. Sperber argues that most factors that guide inferences that take place in the minds of imitators (those who learn), are highly idiosyncratic and they have to do with the unique location of individual in time and space. He suggests that it is not true copying, but that every new form of cultural variant tends to gravitate towards powerful cultural attractors that ensure that deviations cancel each other out.
Návaznosti
EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaVNázev: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 18. 9. 2024 21:05