2014
Economic evaluation of rFVIIa high initial dose compared to rFVIIa standard initial dose in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors using the Czech HemoRec registry
SALAJ, Peter; Radovan KUBES; Petr CETKOVSKÝ; Irena CAPOVA; Miroslav PENKA et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Economic evaluation of rFVIIa high initial dose compared to rFVIIa standard initial dose in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors using the Czech HemoRec registry
Autoři
SALAJ, Peter; Radovan KUBES; Petr CETKOVSKÝ; Irena CAPOVA; Miroslav PENKA; Petra OVESNÁ ORCID; Johan MESTERTON a Peter LINDGREN
Vydání
Thrombosis Research, Oxford, Pergamon-Elsevier Science, 2014, 0049-3848
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.447
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/14:00075516
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Haemophilia; NovoSeven (R); rFVIIa; High dose; Costs; Time to treatment
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 2. 2015 15:32, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: In the treatment of bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, a high initial dose of recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) provides at least equal efficacy and a similar safety profile to a standard initial dose. However, no pharmacoeconomic comparison between these dosing regimens has previously been performed. Here, we assess the pharmacoeconomics of high (> 120 mu g/kg) versus standard (<= 120 mu g/kg) initial rFVIIa dose in inhibitor patients and the impact of time to treatment initiation on costs and outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, observational data on bleed characteristics, rFVIIa treatment, hospitalizations and outcomes were extracted from the Czech Republic HemoRec registry. Crude comparisons and generalized linear regression modelling (GLM; correcting for patient differences) were performed to compare costs and outcomes between the high and standard initial dosing groups. Results: Of 314 rFVIIa-treated bleeding episodes (12 inhibitor patients), most were spontaneous joint bleeds and 67.5% were treated with a high initial dose. In the crude comparison, high initial rFVIIa dosing was associated with a lower mean number of doses needed to achieve haemostasis compared with standard dosing (p < 0.001), but higher total dose and costs (p <= 0.008). However, regression analyses revealed that high initial dose was associated with similar costs (p = 0.891) and a shorter time to bleeding resolution (p = 0.014). Increasing time to treatment initiation increased both time to bleeding resolution and total costs. Conclusion: Compared with a standard dose, a high initial rFVIIa dose may improve treatment outcomes without increasing costs. Early treatment initiation may reduce treatment costs.