2013
Le juge et la coutume internationale: perspective de l’Union européenne et de la Cour de justice
MALENOVSKÝ, JiříZákladní údaje
Originální název
Le juge et la coutume internationale: perspective de l’Union européenne et de la Cour de justice
Název anglicky
The judge and international custom: perspective of the European Union and the Court of Justice
Autoři
Vydání
The law & practice of international courts and tribunals, Leiden, Brill, 2013, 1569-1853
Další údaje
Jazyk
francouzština
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50500 5.5 Law
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/13:00082066
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
UT WoS
Klíčová slova anglicky
European Union; Court of Justice of the European Union; judge and international custom
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 5. 2016 11:36, Mgr. Petra Georgala
V originále
Jiří Malenovský presents the perspective of the European Union (EU) and of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) with regard to the issue of the judge and international custom. His presentation focuses notably on (I) the EU's contribution to the formation of customary rules and on (II) the various approaches taken by the CJEU over time as to the binding force of international custom in the EU's legal order. Furthermore, Jiří Malenovský illustrates (III) the various degrees of openness towards international custom in the case-law of the CJEU. He also presents (IV) the criteria used by the CJEU in its cautious attempts to identify both the existence and the content of the rules of international customary law. Finally, he provides information with regard to (V) the CJEU's evaluation of the direct effect/applicability and enforceability of customary international rules.
Anglicky
Jiří Malenovský presents the perspective of the European Union (EU) and of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) with regard to the issue of the judge and international custom. His presentation focuses notably on (I) the EU's contribution to the formation of customary rules and on (II) the various approaches taken by the CJEU over time as to the binding force of international custom in the EU's legal order. Furthermore, Jiří Malenovský illustrates (III) the various degrees of openness towards international custom in the case-law of the CJEU. He also presents (IV) the criteria used by the CJEU in its cautious attempts to identify both the existence and the content of the rules of international customary law. Finally, he provides information with regard to (V) the CJEU's evaluation of the direct effect/applicability and enforceability of customary international rules.