Detailed Information on Publication Record
2014
Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics - strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology
WILCZEK, Josef, Fabrice MONNA, Philippe BARRAL, Laure BURLET, Carmela CHATEAU et. al.Basic information
Original name
Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics - strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology
Authors
WILCZEK, Josef (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Fabrice MONNA (250 France), Philippe BARRAL (250 France), Laure BURLET (250 France), Carmela CHATEAU (250 France) and Nicolas NAVARRO (250 France)
Edition
Journal of Archaeological Science, Academic Press, 2014, 0305-4403
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
Archaeology, anthropology, ethnology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.196
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14210/14:00076009
Organization unit
Faculty of Arts
UT WoS
000343336200005
Keywords in English
Bibracte; Pottery; Archaeology; Type; Elliptic Fourier Analysis; Discrete Cosine Transform; Open contour; Closed contour
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 24/4/2015 19:46, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková
Abstract
V originále
Although the potential of geometric morphometrics for the study of archaeological artefacts is recognised, quantitative evaluations of the concordance between such methods and traditional typology are rare. The present work seeks to fill this gap, using as a case study a corpus of 154 complete ceramic vessels from the Bibracte oppidum (France), the capital of the Celtic tribe Aedui from the Second Iron Age. Two outline-based approaches were selected: the Elliptic Fourier Analysis and the Discrete Cosine Transform. They were combined with numerous methods of standardisation/normalisation. Although standardisations may use either perimeter or surface, the resulting morphospaces remain comparable, and, interestingly, are also comparable with the morphospace built from traditional typology. Geometric morphometrics also present the advantage of being easily implemented and automated for large sets of artefacts. The method is reproducible and provides quantitative estimates, such as mean shape, and shape diversity of ceramic assemblages, allowing objective inferences to be statistically tested. The approach can easily be generalised and adopted for other kinds of artefacts, to study the level of production standardisation and the evolution of shape over space and time, and to provide information about material and cultural exchanges.