2014
Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics - strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology
WILCZEK, Josef, Fabrice MONNA, Philippe BARRAL, Laure BURLET, Carmela CHATEAU et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics - strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology
Autoři
WILCZEK, Josef (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Fabrice MONNA (250 Francie), Philippe BARRAL (250 Francie), Laure BURLET (250 Francie), Carmela CHATEAU (250 Francie) a Nicolas NAVARRO (250 Francie)
Vydání
Journal of Archaeological Science, Academic Press, 2014, 0305-4403
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.196
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/14:00076009
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
UT WoS
000343336200005
Klíčová slova anglicky
Bibracte; Pottery; Archaeology; Type; Elliptic Fourier Analysis; Discrete Cosine Transform; Open contour; Closed contour
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 24. 4. 2015 19:46, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková
Anotace
V originále
Although the potential of geometric morphometrics for the study of archaeological artefacts is recognised, quantitative evaluations of the concordance between such methods and traditional typology are rare. The present work seeks to fill this gap, using as a case study a corpus of 154 complete ceramic vessels from the Bibracte oppidum (France), the capital of the Celtic tribe Aedui from the Second Iron Age. Two outline-based approaches were selected: the Elliptic Fourier Analysis and the Discrete Cosine Transform. They were combined with numerous methods of standardisation/normalisation. Although standardisations may use either perimeter or surface, the resulting morphospaces remain comparable, and, interestingly, are also comparable with the morphospace built from traditional typology. Geometric morphometrics also present the advantage of being easily implemented and automated for large sets of artefacts. The method is reproducible and provides quantitative estimates, such as mean shape, and shape diversity of ceramic assemblages, allowing objective inferences to be statistically tested. The approach can easily be generalised and adopted for other kinds of artefacts, to study the level of production standardisation and the evolution of shape over space and time, and to provide information about material and cultural exchanges.