Do we always consistently define the clinically important
echocardiographic parameters?

J 2014

Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters?

MELUZÍN, Jaroslav; Zdeňka GREGOROVÁ; Helena PODROUŽKOVÁ a Roman PANOVSKÝ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters?

Autoři

MELUZÍN, Jaroslav; Zdeňka GREGOROVÁ; Helena PODROUŽKOVÁ a Roman PANOVSKÝ

Vydání

Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University, Olomouc, Palacky University, 2014, 1213-8118

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.200

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/14:00076130

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

left ventricular mass; relative wall thickness

Štítky

EL OK

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 8. 2014 12:25, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Aims. The aim of this short communication is to highlight some inconsistencies in defining two clinically important echocardiographic parameters with possible impact on clinical practice. Methods and Results. A surview of publications in reputable cardiological journals revealed inconsistencies posing questions on the validity of the published data and on the scrupulousness of the reviewing process. We demonstrate examples of inconsistencies in the calculation of left ventricular mass using Devereux's formula and in the definition of relative wall thickness, two echocardiographic parameters commonly utilized in a clinical practice. Conclusion. It is desirable to follow exactly the definitions of more complex parameters and to unify ways of presenting those with several definitions.

Citovat

MELUZÍN, Jaroslav; Zdeňka GREGOROVÁ; Helena PODROUŽKOVÁ a Roman PANOVSKÝ. Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters? Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University. Olomouc: Palacky University, 2014, roč. 158, č. 2, s. 313-314. ISSN 1213-8118. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.058.

@article{1194796,
   author = {Meluzín, Jaroslav and Gregorová, Zdeňka and Podroužková, Helena and Panovský, Roman},
   article_location = {Olomouc},
   article_number = {2},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.058},
   keywords = {left ventricular mass; relative wall thickness},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1213-8118},
   journal = {Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University},
   title = {Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters?},
   volume = {158},
   year = {2014}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1194796
AU  - Meluzín, Jaroslav - Gregorová, Zdeňka - Podroužková, Helena - Panovský, Roman
PY  - 2014
TI  - Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters?
JF  - Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University
VL  - 158
IS  - 2
SP  - 313-314
EP  - 313-314
PB  - Palacky University
SN  - 12138118
KW  - left ventricular mass
KW  - relative wall thickness
N2  - Aims. The aim of this short communication is to highlight some inconsistencies in defining two clinically important echocardiographic parameters with possible impact on clinical practice. Methods and Results. A surview of publications in reputable cardiological journals revealed inconsistencies posing questions on the validity of the published data and on the scrupulousness of the reviewing process. We demonstrate examples of inconsistencies in the calculation of left ventricular mass using Devereux's formula and in the definition of relative wall thickness, two echocardiographic parameters commonly utilized in a clinical practice. Conclusion. It is desirable to follow exactly the definitions of more complex parameters and to unify ways of presenting those with several definitions.
ER  -

MELUZÍN, Jaroslav; Zdeňka GREGOROVÁ; Helena PODROUŽKOVÁ a Roman PANOVSKÝ. Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters? \textit{Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University}. Olomouc: Palacky University, 2014, roč.~158, č.~2, s.~313-314. ISSN~1213-8118. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.058.

Přehled o publikaci