ROHÁČEK, Jindřich a Andrea TÓTHOVÁ. Morphology versus DNA – what will bring clarity to the relationships of phylogenetically unclear genera of Anthomyzidae (Diptera)? Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny. Senckenberg, 2014, roč. 72, č. 2, s. 165-176. ISSN 1863-7221.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Morphology versus DNA – what will bring clarity to the relationships of phylogenetically unclear genera of Anthomyzidae (Diptera)?
Autoři ROHÁČEK, Jindřich (203 Česká republika, garant) a Andrea TÓTHOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí).
Vydání Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, Senckenberg, 2014, 1863-7221.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Stát vydavatele Německo
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 1.368
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14310/14:00077779
Organizační jednotka Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS 000341409600005
Klíčová slova anglicky Diptera Anthomyzidae phylogeny mitochondrial + nuclear markers inter- and intra-generic relationships impact on systematics
Štítky AKR, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Lucie Jarošová, DiS., učo 205746. Změněno: 8. 3. 2018 13:06.
Anotace
A hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships of mainly Holarctic Anthomyzidae based on multigene analysis of combined mitochondrial + nuclear gene markers is compared with those of previously published cladistic analyses of morphological characters with the aim to elucidate affinities of phylogenetically unsettled taxa. The placement of Fungomyza Roháček, 1999, Amygdalops Lamb, 1914 + Typhamyza Roháček, 1992 and Quametopia Roháček & Barber, 2011 + Paranthomyza Czerny, 1902 proved to be well supported by molecular data but are inconsistent with those suggested by morphological data analyses, therefore demanding further phylogenetic study. In other groups, the relationships recognized by multigene molecular analysis are in agreement with previous or subsequent morphological examination: the Mumetopia nigrimana group is postulated as the closest ally of Stiphrosoma Czerny, 1928 and hence needs to be excluded from Mumetopia Melander, 1913; intrageneric relationships of Arganthomyza Roháček, 2009 and allies revealed that Ischnomyia spinosa Hendel, 1918 is, in fact, a species of Arganthomyza and that the concept of the genus Ischnomyia Loew, 1863 has to be redefined; Epischnomyia Roháček, 2006 proved to be closest to Anthomyza Fallén, 1810. The placement of the genera Anagnota Becker, 1902, Carexomyza Roháček, 2009, Cercagnota Roháček & Freidberg, 1993 and Santhomyza Roháček, 1984 have not been resolved either by molecular or morphological analyses and their sister groups remain unknown. The new molecular evidence provides new insight into the phylogeny of Anthomyzidae, but like morphology, fails to resolve some key nodes, suggesting that new studies using both sources of information will be necessary to fully reconstruct the history of the family.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 12. 5. 2024 05:39