2014
Problematic Consequences of the Theoretical Evolution of Postcolonial Studies
KLÍMOVÁ, ZuzanaZákladní údaje
Originální název
Problematic Consequences of the Theoretical Evolution of Postcolonial Studies
Autoři
Vydání
STUDIA ANGLICA RESOVIENSIA: INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH STUDIES JOURNAL, 2014, 1898-8709
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
Písemnictví, masmedia, audiovize
Stát vydavatele
Polsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14410/14:00077847
Organizační jednotka
Pedagogická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
postcolonial theory;evolution;problematic terminology
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 3. 2015 08:36, Mgr. Zuzana Kršková, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
This paper does not attempt to present solutions to the currently debated problem of the continuing relevance of the Postcolonial Studies, but tries to open the Foucauldian ‘field of problematization’ within the theory which is rather a set of various approaches than a consistent theory. It points out aspects of the theory as well as its methodology that lead to the questioning of its relevance in the twenty first century. There is a great need to rethink basic concepts like ‘post-colonialism’, ‘postcolonial’ author, ‘counter-discourse’, and ‘First’ and ‘Third’ world that are no longer sustainable. The critical feature of postcolonial literary theory is its association with a particular historical period and specific political transformation of the world. Despite its direct connection to history, politics and economy, the preoccupation of postcolonial literary studies with epistemological and cultural questions still prevails. With recent inclination to Rhetoric and Cultural Studies, ‘postcolonial’ literary criticism should open more to interdisciplinary approaches rethinking the ‘postcolonial’ space of questioning, drawing on the reciprocity of the power-struggle experience and its discursive re(-)presentation. Despite the academic inconveniences of such an approach, cooperation across fields of research seems inevitable if ‘postcolonial’ studies want to accomplish its aim on which its existence is based – to allow the emergence of a truly autonomous subject.