2014
Troubles with Dialogic Teaching. How to Situate Dialogue Back in Classrooms.
ŠVAŘÍČEK, Roman, Klára ŠEĎOVÁ a Martin SEDLÁČEKZákladní údaje
Originální název
Troubles with Dialogic Teaching. How to Situate Dialogue Back in Classrooms.
Název česky
Potíže s dialogickým vyučováním. Jak lze dialogicky vyučovat?
Autoři
ŠVAŘÍČEK, Roman (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Klára ŠEĎOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Martin SEDLÁČEK (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
European Conference on Educational Research: The Past, Present and Future of Educational Research in Europe, Porto, Portugal, 1-6 September 2014. 2014. 2014
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
50300 5.3 Education
Stát vydavatele
Portugalsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/14:00074258
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
výuková komunikace; dialogické vyučování; akční výzkum;
Klíčová slova anglicky
Educational communication; dialogic teaching; action research
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 22. 3. 2015 22:12, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková
Anotace
V originále
Classroom discourse has become one of the key topics of educational science. Many authors have a long-term research interest in forms of talk in the classroom and their educational functions.This paper examines dialogic teaching in Czech lower secondary schools and shows whether Czech teachers use forms of dialogic teaching in their practice. It is based on an analysis of empirical data obtained from two successive research projects. The first one, called Communication in the Classroom (2009–2011) and its aim was to describe current state of educational communication in humanities subjects at Czech lower secondary schools. Data were collected through field ethnographic research using the method of video studies (Lefstein, Snell, 2014). This research has shown that Czech teachers are strongly biased in favour of dialogic teaching and consider it an ideal way of educational communication, but their real communication techniques are far from this ideal – teachers ask close questions of low cognitive demandingness; pupils' contributions to the communication are very short; no discussion takes place as the IRF structure (Mehan, 1979) is continuously maintained.
Návaznosti
GA13-23578S, projekt VaV |
|