J 2014

Differences in long-term outcome after femoral, subclavian and aortic approach to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

BRANNY, Marian; Piotr BRANNY; Jaroslav JANUSKA; Miroslav HUDEC; Krystyna KLUZOVA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Differences in long-term outcome after femoral, subclavian and aortic approach to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Autoři

BRANNY, Marian; Piotr BRANNY; Jaroslav JANUSKA; Miroslav HUDEC; Krystyna KLUZOVA; Pavla KUFOVA; Libor SKNOURIL; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; Milan BLAHA a Petr KALA

Vydání

Experimental & clinical card, Toronto, Cardiology Academic Press, 2014, 1205-6626

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.758 v roce 2013

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/14:00078124

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Aortic valve implantation; Transaortic approach; Long-term mortality; TAVI; Aortic stenosis

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 9. 1. 2015 11:07, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represents an effective treatment of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. There is no evidence of the long-term outcome of alternative approaches to TAVI. Aim: To asses the clinical outcome after subclavian and aortic TAVI compared to standard femoral approach. Methods: Prospective single-centre study comprise 228 consecutive TAVI patients (average age 79 years, logistic EuroSCORE 17.2, 53.5% females) divided in 1)Femoral, 2)Aortic and 3)Subclavian groups. More peripheral artery disease was found in both Aortic and Subclavian groups. The self-expandable CoreValve (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN USA) stented prosthesis was exclusively implanted. Results: In 99.6% the valve was successfully deployed. At 30 days the mortality and bleeding occurred in 2.6% and 3.5%, respectively, irrespective of the approach. The long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)and mortality rate were higher in patients after transaortic TAVI (mortality - 31.3% at 1 year; 65.6% at 2 years in aortic, 14,7%; 24.1% in femoral and 13.1%; 24.7% in subclavian groups, respectively; p=0.043, MACE; p=0.031). Conclusion: Compared to the femoral and subclavian approaches, patients after transaortic TAVI have significantly higher MACE and mortality rate up to 2 years.