2014
The Models of Legitimizing Inclusive Education in the Czech Republic
SHMIDT, Victoria a Karel PANČOCHAZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Models of Legitimizing Inclusive Education in the Czech Republic
Název anglicky
The Models of Legitimizing Inclusive Education in the Czech Republic
Autoři
SHMIDT, Victoria a Karel PANČOCHA
Vydání
II. Olomoucké speciálněpedagogické dny, 2014
Další údaje
Jazyk
čeština
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
50300 5.3 Education
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizační jednotka
Pedagogická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
people with disabilities, legitimizing models, inclusive education
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 7. 7. 2015 14:31, prof. PhDr. Karel Pančocha, Ph.D., M.Sc.
V originále
In the Czech Rep., inclusive education obtains twofold status, legal but not legitimized yet. Surveys approve the high degree of resistance among various stakeholders to inclusion of Roma and disabled children into mainstream education. The question How to promote inclusion requires juxtaposing two research perceptivities, general evaluation of educational strategies and discourses applied by agents in favour of (de)legitimacy of inclusion. We apply the threefold concept of legitimacy (input, throughput, and output types) to scrutinize the operating system of education in order to indicate various models towards legitimizing inclusive education through the content-analysis of public debates around the issues related to inclusion. Three models were differentiated: potentially efficient instrument for individualizing educational process; a new institution overcoming current selective educational system; inclusive ideology as the grounds for systematic monitoring under the quality of education. Despite the opposite attitude to the worthwhileness of joint education of children with and without special needs, actors expound compatible arrays of concepts around education and childhood emphasizing output legitimacy but remain in mutual opposition because of different vision on the indices of efficient education.
Anglicky
In the Czech Rep., inclusive education obtains twofold status, legal but not legitimized yet. Surveys approve the high degree of resistance among various stakeholders to inclusion of Roma and disabled children into mainstream education. The question How to promote inclusion requires juxtaposing two research perceptivities, general evaluation of educational strategies and discourses applied by agents in favour of (de)legitimacy of inclusion. We apply the threefold concept of legitimacy (input, throughput, and output types) to scrutinize the operating system of education in order to indicate various models towards legitimizing inclusive education through the content-analysis of public debates around the issues related to inclusion. Three models were differentiated: potentially efficient instrument for individualizing educational process; a new institution overcoming current selective educational system; inclusive ideology as the grounds for systematic monitoring under the quality of education. Despite the opposite attitude to the worthwhileness of joint education of children with and without special needs, actors expound compatible arrays of concepts around education and childhood emphasizing output legitimacy but remain in mutual opposition because of different vision on the indices of efficient education.