Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a
significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain

J 2015

Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain

HULME, Philip; Anibal PAUCHARD; Petr PYŠEK; Montserrat VILA; Christina ALBA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain

Autoři

Vydání

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 2015, 0027-8424

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 9.423

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/15:00083382

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506517112

UT WoS

000355823200005

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-84931281825

Klíčová slova anglicky

alien species; Great Britain; impact

Štítky

AKR, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 3. 2018 10:37, Mgr. Lucie Jarošová, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Conservation scientists and practitioners have long recognized that not all non-native species pose a threat to biodiversity, yet some ecologists still fail to grasp this message (1). The conclusions drawn by Thomas and Palmer (2) that non-native plant species are not a threat to floral diversity in Britain highlight how this lack of understanding can lead to inappropriate analyses and misleading inferences regarding the impacts of non-native species. Thomas and Palmer base their conclusions on an analysis of the Countryside Survey (CS): this valuable dataset depicts large-scale vegetation changes in common habitats, but its stratified random design does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of non-native plant species on native biodiversity.

Citovat

HULME, Philip; Anibal PAUCHARD; Petr PYŠEK; Montserrat VILA; Christina ALBA; Tim BLACKBURN; James BULLOCK; Milan CHYTRÝ; Wayne DAWSON; Alison DUNN; Franz Sebastian ESSL; Piero GENOVESI; Lindsay MASKELL; Laura MEYERSON; Martin NUNEZ; Jan PERGL; Oliver PESCOTT; Michael POCOCK; David RICHARDSON; Helen ROY; Simon SMART; Kateřina ŠTAJEROVÁ; Thomas STOHLGREN; Mark VAN KLEUNEN a Marten WINTER. Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 2015, roč. 112, č. 23, s. "E2988"-"E2989", 2 s. ISSN 0027-8424. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506517112.

@article{1306252,
   author = {Hulme, Philip and Pauchard, Anibal and Pyšek, Petr and Vila, Montserrat and Alba, Christina and Blackburn, Tim and Bullock, James and Chytrý, Milan and Dawson, Wayne and Dunn, Alison and Essl, Franz Sebastian and Genovesi, Piero and Maskell, Lindsay and Meyerson, Laura and Nunez, Martin and Pergl, Jan and Pescott, Oliver and Pocock, Michael and Richardson, David and Roy, Helen and Smart, Simon and Štajerová, Kateřina and Stohlgren, Thomas and van Kleunen, Mark and Winter, Marten},
   article_number = {23},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506517112},
   keywords = {alien species; Great Britain; impact},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0027-8424},
   journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A.},
   title = {Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain},
   url = {http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1506517112},
   volume = {112},
   year = {2015}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1306252
AU  - Hulme, Philip - Pauchard, Anibal - Pyšek, Petr - Vila, Montserrat - Alba, Christina - Blackburn, Tim - Bullock, James - Chytrý, Milan - Dawson, Wayne - Dunn, Alison - Essl, Franz Sebastian - Genovesi, Piero - Maskell, Lindsay - Meyerson, Laura - Nunez, Martin - Pergl, Jan - Pescott, Oliver - Pocock, Michael - Richardson, David - Roy, Helen - Smart, Simon - Štajerová, Kateřina - Stohlgren, Thomas - van Kleunen, Mark - Winter, Marten
PY  - 2015
TI  - Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain
JF  - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A.
VL  - 112
IS  - 23
SP  - "E2988"-"E2989"
EP  - "E2988"-"E2989"
SN  - 00278424
KW  - alien species
KW  - Great Britain
KW  - impact
UR  - http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1506517112
N2  - Conservation scientists and practitioners have long recognized that not all non-native species pose a threat to biodiversity, yet some ecologists still fail to grasp this message (1). The conclusions drawn by Thomas and Palmer (2) that non-native plant species are not a threat to floral diversity in Britain highlight how this lack of understanding can lead to inappropriate analyses and misleading inferences regarding the impacts of non-native species. Thomas and Palmer base their conclusions on an analysis of the Countryside Survey (CS): this valuable dataset depicts large-scale vegetation changes in common habitats, but its stratified random design does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of non-native plant species on native biodiversity.
ER  -

HULME, Philip; Anibal PAUCHARD; Petr PYŠEK; Montserrat VILA; Christina ALBA; Tim BLACKBURN; James BULLOCK; Milan CHYTRÝ; Wayne DAWSON; Alison DUNN; Franz Sebastian ESSL; Piero GENOVESI; Lindsay MASKELL; Laura MEYERSON; Martin NUNEZ; Jan PERGL; Oliver PESCOTT; Michael POCOCK; David RICHARDSON; Helen ROY; Simon SMART; Kateřina ŠTAJEROVÁ; Thomas STOHLGREN; Mark VAN KLEUNEN a Marten WINTER. Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain. \textit{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A.}. 2015, roč.~112, č.~23, s.~''E2988''-''E2989'', 2 s. ISSN~0027-8424. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506517112.

Přehled o publikaci