PEZLAR, Ivo. Type-Theoretical Approaches to Problems and Solutions. In 15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki. 2015.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Type-Theoretical Approaches to Problems and Solutions
Autoři PEZLAR, Ivo (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání 15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki, 2015.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Prezentace na konferencích
Obor 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele Finsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14210/15:00083750
Organizační jednotka Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky constructive type theory; transparent intensional logic; logic of problems
Štítky mzok, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Marie Skřivanová, učo 262124. Změněno: 23. 2. 2016 16:59.
Anotace
We examine two possible approaches to the formal treatment of the notion of problem in the type-theoretical paradigm. More specifically, we will explore an approach put forward by Martin-Löf's Constructive Type Theory (abbr. CTT, based on BHK interpretation of intuitionistic logic and Curry-Howard-de Bruijn correspondence), which can be seen as a direct continuation of Kolmogorov's original calculus of problems, and an approach put forward by Materna utilizing Tichý's Transparent Intensional Logic (abbr. TIL, based on partial lambda calculus and ramified classical type theory), which can be viewed as a realist attempt of interpreting Kolmogorov's logic of problems. Thus both of these theories can be seen as building upon Kolmogorov's first key insight that (constructive) logic is better understood as dealing with problems rather than with propositions. We conclude that neither of these theories can be considered at their current state as providing satisfactory account of the notion of problem. CTT due to its insufficient treatment of empirical problems (specifically, it is unclear how to apply the concepts of canonical and non-canonical proofs in the realm of empirical discourse). TIL due to its incomplete analysis of non-empirical problems (specifically, its inability to track, and thus distinguish different logical proofs). We propose our own approach called Transparent Intensional Logic of Problems (abbr. TILP, an extension based on modified TIL emulating some of the properties of CTT) that tries to combine strengths of both approaches without retaining any of their weak points. Further, TILP can be seen as building upon Kolmogorov's second (and often neglected) key insight that (constructive) logic is best understood as dealing with both problems and propositions, but without conflating them together.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/1153/2014, interní kód MUNázev: Soudobé problémy a minulé podoby filozofické diskuse
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Soudobé problémy a minulé podoby filozofické diskuse, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 12. 9. 2024 10:23