KLUSOŇOVÁ, Markéta. Communitas, Communion and the Judicial Reasoning. In KLUSOŇOVÁ, Markéta, Michal MALANÍK, Monika STACHOŇOVÁ a Martin ŠKOP. Argumentation 2015 : international conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law. Brno: Masaryk University, 2015. s. 103-120, 18 s. ISBN 978-80-210-7970-0.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Communitas, Communion and the Judicial Reasoning
Autoři KLUSOŇOVÁ, Markéta (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Brno, Argumentation 2015 : international conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law, od s. 103-120, 18 s. 2015.
Nakladatel Masaryk University
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Stať ve sborníku
Obor 50500 5.5 Law
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14220/15:00084635
Organizační jednotka Právnická fakulta
ISBN 978-80-210-7970-0
UT WoS 000371279200005
Klíčová slova anglicky Communion; Communitas; Rhetoric; Judicial Reasoning; Law and Literature
Štítky rivok
Příznaky Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Změněno: 28. 4. 2016 13:42.
Anotace
Understanding of acceptability of various rhetorical tools in legal reasoning has a pivotal role in the field of legal argumentation. Previous studies (as the most influential of them New Rhetoric written by Chaim Perelman and Lucie OlbrechtsTyteca) have reported that rhetorical approach has much to offer to legal discourse. Though, one of its greatest challenges still remains the same: to prove that rhetorical approach to legal argumentation is reasonable and proper. Still, at least in the civil law systems to date there has been little agreement on which tools of rhetoric are useful way of legal convincing and which serves just as mere rhetorical ornaments. In this paper, I argue that the use of citation of literary fiction in legal reasoning is useful and admissible tool of legal reasoning in any legal system due to its rhetorical and performative character. This paper attempts to show that the way how these citations are used in reasoning of legal decisions may be and should be properly understood in terms of legal rhetoric, especially of the New Rhetoric introduced by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca. The central thesis of this paper is that use of citation of literary fiction in legal reasoning is the way of creating communion between speaker and his audience which serves as a necessary basis of creation of communitas within the audience and this communitas works as one of the tools of legitimization of the legal system. In the pages that follow, it will be argued that performance studies and rhetoric provide necessary answers on possibilities of legal reasoning. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between rhetorical aspects of legal reasoning and legitimacy of judicial decision in the context of citation of literary fiction in legal discourse.
Návaznosti
MUNI/B/1520/2014, interní kód MUNázev: Vizualization of Law (Akronym: Vizualization of Law)
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Grantová agentura MU, DO R. 2020_Kategorie B - Specifický výzkum - Studentské vědecké konference
Typ Název Vložil/a Vloženo Práva
Klusonova_Argumentation.pdf   Verze souboru Georgala, P. 17. 2. 2016

Práva

Právo číst
 
Právo vkládat
 
Právo spravovat
  • osoba Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967
Atributy
 
Vytisknout
Požádat autora o autorský výtisk Zobrazeno: 29. 10. 2020 10:39