a 2015

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Non-Small-Cell- Lung Cancer Treated with Carboplatin and Oral Vinorelbine - SWITCH I Study

KOLEK, Vitezslav; Ivona GRYGARKOVA; Leona KOUBKOVA; Jana SKŘIČKOVÁ; Lenka OSTRIZKOVA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Non-Small-Cell- Lung Cancer Treated with Carboplatin and Oral Vinorelbine - SWITCH I Study

Autoři

KOLEK, Vitezslav; Ivona GRYGARKOVA; Leona KOUBKOVA; Jana SKŘIČKOVÁ; Lenka OSTRIZKOVA; Jirina SVECOVA a Dimka SIXTOVA

Vydání

16th World Conference on Lung Cancer, 2015

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Konferenční abstrakt

Obor

30203 Respiratory systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 5.040

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/15:00084853

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova anglicky

non small cell lung cancer; adjuvant chemotherapy; vinorelbine; carboplatin

Štítky

Změněno: 24. 11. 2015 14:33, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková

Anotace

V originále

Background: Adjuvant cisplatinum-based chemotherapy is recommended in patients with stages IB (> 4 cm), IIA, IIB, and IIIA of non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical resection. Vinorelbine with cisplatin are preferable drugs in this indication, but the side effects of this treatment were not negligible in big adjuvant trials. Carboplatin with vinorelbine given intravenously switched to orally were applied in a multicentre prospective study SWITCH I to give better comfort, higher tolerability and comparable effectivenes as standard adjuvant chemotherapy. The recruitment period started in January 12th, 2005 and lasted till September 5th, 2008. Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatinum and vinorelbine given intravenously on the day 1 and orally on the day 8 in 21 day regimen appears to be a comfortable and tolerable therapy in radically resected NSCLC. It provides higher dose intensity and more of acomplished treatments compared to big adjuvant trials and LACE meta-analysis, in which these parametres varied between 50 % to 76 % only. Survival results are comparable to LACE (3-year survival 70,3% vs 64.3%), 5-year survival 56,2% vs 55.1%) and MOS 5.9 vs 5.15 y).