2015
Prognostic value of stress-only and stress-rest normal gated SPECT imaging: higher incidence of cardiac hard events in diabetic patients who underwent full stress-rest imaging
KAMINEK, Milan, Iva METELKOVA, Miroslava BUDIKOVA, Lenka HENZLOVA, Pavel KORANDA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Prognostic value of stress-only and stress-rest normal gated SPECT imaging: higher incidence of cardiac hard events in diabetic patients who underwent full stress-rest imaging
Autoři
KAMINEK, Milan (203 Česká republika), Iva METELKOVA (203 Česká republika), Miroslava BUDIKOVA (203 Česká republika), Lenka HENZLOVA (203 Česká republika), Pavel KORANDA (203 Česká republika), Vladimír KINCL (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Adéla DROZDOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Biomedical Papers of the Faculty of Medicine of Palacký University, Olomouc, Palacký University, 2015, 1213-8118
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.924
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/15:00086553
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000364948100020
Klíčová slova anglicky
myocardial perfusion imaging; coronary artery disease; prognosis; stress-only imaging; diabetes mellitus
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 2. 2016 17:11, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková
Anotace
V originále
Background. The European procedural guidelines for cardiac gated SPECT imaging demonstrate considerable variability in recommended administered radiopharmaceutical activity and imaging protocols. This study compared stress-only and stress-rest protocols to evaluate the safety of stress-only imaging, and to identify characteristics of patients who need full stress-rest imaging. Methods. Patients referred for a chest pain were scheduled for stress-rest gated SPECT imaging. If the stress images were interpreted as normal according to the perfusion and left ventricular function, the examination of patients was finished and patients did not undergo the rest imaging. A total number of 1063 patients was included (mean age 61 +/- 11 years). These patients have been followed for hard cardiac events, i.e. cardiac deaths or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Results. During a follow-up of 3.2 +/- 2.5 years, hard events occurred in 12 patients with normal SPECT and 59 with abnormal SPECT had hard events (0.7 vs. 3.6% /year, P < 0.001). Among the 536 patients with normal study, there was no significantly lower incidence of hard events in the subgroup of patients with stress-only imaging (0.6 vs. 0.8% /year, P = 0.641). Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of hard events in patients with normal SPECT (1.3 vs. 0.5%/year, P < 0.001). We found a higher incidence of hard events in diabetic patients with normal study with the necessity of full stress-rest imaging in comparison with those with stress-only imaging (1.7 vs. 0.7% /year, P < 0.001). Conclusions. Our results support the good prognosis of normal stress-only study. Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of hard events in patients with normal SPECT. Diabetic patients with normal results who required additional rest imaging had significant adverse outcome.