SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS

D 2016

SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS

ŠVARCOVÁ, Kateřina

Basic information

Original name

SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS

Authors

ŠVARCOVÁ, Kateřina

Edition

London, CER Comparative European Research 2016 Proceedings | Research Track of the 5th Biannual CER Comparative European Research Conference. p. 72-76, 5 pp. 2016

Publisher

Sciemcee Publishing

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Stať ve sborníku

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

storage medium (CD, DVD, flash disk)

References:

Open access sborníku

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

ISBN

978-0-9928772-9-3

Keywords in English

local governments, officials, systemic bias, risk of bias, employment relationship

Abstract

V originále

The basic assumptions of legislation regulating bias or systemic bias in administrative proceedings, relevant judicial decisions as well as opinions of the professional public, all form a platform by which the author approaches this analysis of one of the phenomena of our time – systemic bias. With regard to sufficient material covering this issue (either the numerous judicial decisions or opinions of the professional public), one may conclude that this concerns a highly relevant and widely discussed question on which no unified opinion exists in the applied and scientific theory legal world. In reflecting upon the attained findings, the author arrives at the opinion on systemic bias as a defined type of bias in general, determined by a society-wide trend to name occurring phenomena, to distinguish them and analyze them. It comes inherently from the established mixed model of public administration. However it does not exist a priori, but only ad hoc in specific cases. Visibility and clarity of systemic bias are not simple nor can they be, however, in light of the potential of danger of bias. Established legislation or its interpretive case law does not facilitate the functioning and decision-making activity of officials today. Nevertheless, more attention should focus rather on the means of exercising an objection to this bias, and on the time and formal structure of the relating procedure.

Links

MUNI/A/1155/2015, interní kód MU

Name: Udržitelná spotřeba jako nástroj k zachování biologické rozmanitosti a přežití lidstva (Acronym: SVARDUDO)

Investor: Masaryk University, Category A

Citovat

ŠVARCOVÁ, Kateřina. SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS. In CER Comparative European Research 2016 Proceedings | Research Track of the 5th Biannual CER Comparative European Research Conference. London: Sciemcee Publishing, 2016, p. 72-76. ISBN 978-0-9928772-9-3.

@inproceedings{1343037,
   author = {Švarcová, Kateřina},
   address = {London},
   booktitle = {CER Comparative European Research 2016 Proceedings | Research Track of the 5th Biannual CER Comparative European Research Conference.},
   keywords = {local governments, officials, systemic bias, risk of bias, employment relationship},
   howpublished = {paměťový nosič},
   language = {eng},
   location = {London},
   isbn = {978-0-9928772-9-3},
   pages = {72-76},
   publisher = {Sciemcee Publishing},
   title = {SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS},
   url = {https://www.sciemcee.org/library/proceedings/cer/cer2016_proceedings01.pdf},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1343037
AU  - Švarcová, Kateřina
PY  - 2016
TI  - SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS
PB  - Sciemcee Publishing
CY  - London
SN  - 9780992877293
KW  - local governments, officials, systemic bias, risk of bias, employment relationship
UR  - https://www.sciemcee.org/library/proceedings/cer/cer2016_proceedings01.pdf
N2  - The basic assumptions of legislation regulating bias or systemic bias in administrative proceedings, relevant judicial decisions as well as opinions of the professional public, all form a platform by which the author approaches this analysis of one of the phenomena of our time – systemic bias. With regard to sufficient material covering this issue (either the numerous judicial decisions or opinions of the professional public), one may conclude that this concerns a highly relevant and widely discussed question on which no unified opinion exists in the applied and scientific theory legal world. In reflecting upon the attained findings, the author arrives at the opinion on systemic bias as a defined type of bias in general, determined by a society-wide trend to name occurring phenomena, to distinguish them and analyze them. It comes inherently from the established mixed model of public administration. However it does not exist a priori, but only ad hoc in specific cases. Visibility and clarity of systemic bias are not simple nor can they be, however, in light of the potential of danger of bias. Established legislation or its interpretive case law does not facilitate the functioning and decision-making activity of officials today. Nevertheless, more attention should focus rather on the means of exercising an objection to this bias, and on the time and formal structure of the relating procedure.
ER  -

ŠVARCOVÁ, Kateřina. SYSTEMIC BIAS OF OFFICIALS. In \textit{CER Comparative European Research 2016 Proceedings $|$ Research Track of the 5th Biannual CER Comparative European Research Conference.}. London: Sciemcee Publishing, 2016, p.~72-76. ISBN~978-0-9928772-9-3.

Detailed Information on Publication Record