2016
Performance Challenges, Current Bad Practices, and Hints in PaaS Cloud Application Design
GEŠVINDR, David a Barbora BÜHNOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Performance Challenges, Current Bad Practices, and Hints in PaaS Cloud Application Design
Autoři
GEŠVINDR, David (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Barbora BÜHNOVÁ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
New York, Performance Evaluation Review Volume 43, Issue 4, od s. 3-12, 10 s. 2016
Nakladatel
ACM
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14330/16:00089998
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta informatiky
ISSN
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-84998658667
Klíčová slova anglicky
cloud computing; application design; software architecture
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 27. 4. 2017 05:53, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Cloud computing is becoming a popular approach to software application operation, utilizing on-demand network access to a pool of shared computing resources, and associated with many benefits including low-effort provisioning, rapid elasticity, maintenance cost reduction and pay-as-you-go billing model. However, application deployment in the cloud is not itself a guarantee of high performance, scalability, and related quality attributes, which may come as a surprise to many software engineers who detract from the importance of proper design of a cloud application, expecting that the cloud itself is the solution. In this paper we analyze the issues and challenges associated with the design of a cloud application that has to be in compliance with given performance criteria, such as the throughput and response time. We also analyze the concerns related to other relevant quality criteria, including scalability, elasticity and availability. To support our findings, we demonstrate the identified performance effects of the examined design decisions on two case studies.