Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer
and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech
Arbitration

k 2016

Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina

Základní údaje

Originální název

Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration

Název česky

Otázníky nad rozdíly mezi ochranou spotřebitele a pracovníka z pohledu mezinárodního a českého rozhodčího řízení

Autoři

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina

Vydání

COFOLA International 2016, 2016

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Klíčová slova anglicky

Act on arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards, Arbitration in employment relationship, Consumer arbitration, Employment disputes of property nature, Protection of employee

Příznaky

Recenzováno

Změněno: 5. 9. 2016 09:40, Mgr. Kateřina Remsová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Paper deals with different approaches to consumers and employees in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of the European Union law into the consumer arbitration. However, this Act provides no protection for the employees. In the paper on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I concluded that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between protection of consumer and employee and addresses the question of the reasons why the same level of protection as consumers is not granted to the employees. The aim of this paper is the comparison of the regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relationships in terms of the scope of protection afforded by the Act to consumers or employees and finding reasons why employees do not obtain similar protection as consumers in the arbitration.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1075/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Ochrana zaměstnance ve světle mezinárodního práva soukromého a procesního

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Ochrana zaměstnance ve světle mezinárodního práva soukromého a procesního, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina. Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration. In COFOLA International 2016. 2016.

@proceedings{1353232,
   author = {Remsová, Kateřina},
   booktitle = {COFOLA International 2016},
   keywords = {Act on arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards, Arbitration in employment relationship, Consumer arbitration, Employment disputes of property nature, Protection of employee},
   title = {Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1353232
AU  - Remsová, Kateřina
PY  - 2016
TI  - Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration
KW  - Act on arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards, Arbitration in employment relationship, Consumer arbitration, Employment disputes of property nature, Protection of employee
N2  - Paper deals with different approaches to consumers and employees in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of the European Union law into the consumer arbitration. However, this Act provides no protection for the employees. In the paper on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I concluded that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between protection of consumer and employee and addresses the question of the reasons why the same level of protection as consumers is not granted to the employees. The aim of this paper is the comparison of the regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relationships in terms of the scope of protection afforded by the Act to consumers or employees and finding reasons why employees do not obtain similar protection as consumers in the arbitration.
ER  -

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina. Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration. In \textit{COFOLA International 2016}. 2016.

Přehled o publikaci