TROPEK, Robert, Ilona ČERNÁ, Jakub STRAKA, Petr KOČÁREK, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Filip TICHÁNEK a Pavel ŠEBEK. In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Springer, 2016, roč. 23, č. 14, s. 13653-13660. ISSN 0944-1344. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods
Autoři TROPEK, Robert (203 Česká republika, garant), Ilona ČERNÁ (203 Česká republika), Jakub STRAKA (203 Česká republika), Petr KOČÁREK (203 Česká republika), Igor MALENOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Filip TICHÁNEK (203 Česká republika) a Pavel ŠEBEK (203 Česká republika).
Vydání Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer, 2016, 0944-1344.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Stát vydavatele Německo
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 2.741
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14310/16:00091082
Organizační jednotka Přírodovědecká fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1
UT WoS 000379553500008
Klíčová slova anglicky Aculeata;Araneae;Auchenorrhyncha;Coal combustion;Human-made habitats;Restoration ecology;Orthoptera;Syrphidae
Štítky AKR, rivok
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. Igor Malenovský, Ph.D., učo 21151. Změněno: 16. 2. 2018 22:17.
Anotace
Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 24. 4. 2024 14:57