Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

D 2016

Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

BECHNÁ, Zinaida

Základní údaje

Originální název

Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

Autoři

BECHNÁ, Zinaida

Vydání

1. vyd. Sofia, SGEM: Political Science and Law Proceedings, od s. 341-348, 8 s. 2016

Nakladatel

International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Bulharsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/16:00093041

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

ISBN

978-619-7105-73-5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22

Klíčová slova anglicky

EU Russia Georgia South Ossetia frozen conflict conflict resolution

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 20. 1. 2017 15:40, Mgr. Zinaida Bechná, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Although it was only five days long, the war in South Ossetia was an example of great violence, and more significantly an indicator of diplomatic failure. Given the unresolved status of South Ossetia, this article studies the key agendas and activities of the major actors: 1) the Georgian government and the South Ossetia interim administration; 2) the Russian foreign ministry and the ministry of foreign relations of South Ossetia; and 3) the EU’s monitoring mission in Georgia. The article offers a qualitative analysis of: (a) defamatory diplomatic public statements and activities, including passportization; (b) foreign direct investments; and (c) ideological media campaigns. The study contributes to the wider literature on de-facto states and conflict resolution by shedding light on the process of foreign policy making and lobbying by diplomatic and political actors. The findings are expected to emphasize the fragility of peace arrangements in the Caucasus and the sensitivity of the political environments in which there is no shared understanding among regional actors, who still have not come to live in peace.

Citovat

BECHNÁ, Zinaida. Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia. In SGEM. SGEM: Political Science and Law Proceedings. 1. vyd. Sofia: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts, 2016, s. 341-348. ISBN 978-619-7105-73-5. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22.

@inproceedings{1368629,
   author = {Bechná, Zinaida},
   address = {Sofia},
   booktitle = {SGEM: Political Science and Law Proceedings},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22},
   edition = {1},
   editor = {SGEM},
   keywords = {EU Russia Georgia South Ossetia frozen conflict conflict resolution},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Sofia},
   isbn = {978-619-7105-73-5},
   pages = {341-348},
   publisher = {International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts},
   title = {Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1368629
AU  - Bechná, Zinaida
PY  - 2016
TI  - Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia
PB  - International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts
CY  - Sofia
SN  - 9786197105735
KW  - EU Russia Georgia South Ossetia frozen conflict conflict resolution
N2  - Although it was only five days long, the war in South Ossetia was an example of great violence, and more significantly an indicator of diplomatic failure. Given the unresolved status of South Ossetia, this article studies the key agendas and activities of the major actors: 1) the Georgian government and the South Ossetia interim administration; 2) the Russian foreign ministry and the ministry of foreign relations of South Ossetia; and 3) the EU’s monitoring mission in Georgia. The article offers a qualitative analysis of: (a) defamatory diplomatic public statements and activities, including passportization; (b) foreign direct investments; and (c) ideological media campaigns. The study contributes to the wider literature on de-facto states and conflict resolution by shedding light on the process of foreign policy making and lobbying by diplomatic and political actors. The findings are expected to emphasize the fragility of peace arrangements in the Caucasus and the sensitivity of the political environments in which there is no shared understanding among regional actors, who still have not come to live in peace.
ER  -

BECHNÁ, Zinaida. Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia. In SGEM. \textit{SGEM: Political Science and Law Proceedings}. 1. vyd. Sofia: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts, 2016, s.~341-348. ISBN~978-619-7105-73-5. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22.

Přehled o publikaci