J 2016

Multivariate Analysis of Correspondence between Left Atrial Volumes Assessed by Echocardiography and 3-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

HAVRANEK, S.; Martin FIALA; A. BULAVA; L. SKNOURIL; M. DORDA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Multivariate Analysis of Correspondence between Left Atrial Volumes Assessed by Echocardiography and 3-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Autoři

HAVRANEK, S.; Martin FIALA; A. BULAVA; L. SKNOURIL; M. DORDA; V. BULKOVA; Z. FINGROVA; L. SOUCKOVA; T. PALECEK; J. SIMEK; A. LINHART a D. WICHTERLE

Vydání

Plos one, San Francisco, Public Library of Science, 2016, 1932-6203

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.806

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/16:00093174

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Echocardiography; 3-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping; Atrial Fibrillation

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 9. 2. 2017 10:30, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková

Anotace

V originále

Background Left atrial (LA) enlargement is a predictor of worse outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Widely used two-dimensional (2D)-echocardiography is inaccurate and underestimates real LA volume (LAV). We hypothesized that baseline clinical characteristics of patients can be used to adjust 2D-ECHO indices of LAV in order to minimize this disagreement. Methods The study enrolled 535 patients (59 +/- 9 years; 67% males; 43% paroxysmal AF) who underwent catheter ablation for AF in three specialized centers. We investigated multivariately the relationship between 2D-echocardiographic indices of LA size, specifically LA diameter in M-mode in the parasternal long-axis view (LAD), LAV assessed by the prolate-ellipsoid method (LAV(Ellipsoid)), LAV by the planimetric method (LAV(Planimetry)), and LAV derived from 3D-electroanatomic mapping (LAV(CARTO)). Results Cubed LAD of 106 +/- 45 ml, LAV(Ellipsoid) of 72 +/- 24 ml and LAV(Planimetry) of 88 +/- 30 ml correlated only modestly (r = 0.60, 0.69, and 0.53, respectively) with LAV(CARTO) of 137 +/- 46 ml, which was significantly underestimated with a bias (+/- 1.96 standard deviation) of -31 (-111; +49) ml, -64(-132; +2) ml, and -49(-125; +27) ml, respectively; p < 0.0001 for their mutual difference. LA enlargement itself, age, gender, type of AF, and the presence of structural heart disease were independent confounders of measurement error of 2D-echocardiographic LAV. Conclusion Accuracy and precision of all 2D-echocardiographic LAV indices are poor. Their agreement with true LAV can be significantly improved by multivariate adjustment to clinical characteristics of patients.