Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in
the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland

J 2016

Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland

KŘEPELKA, Filip

Základní údaje

Originální název

Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland

Název česky

Rozličné přístup k přeshraničnímu pohybu pacientů v Evropské unii v Česku, Slovensku a Polsku

Autoři

KŘEPELKA, Filip

Vydání

Medicine, Law & Society, Maribor, University of Maribor Press, 2016, 2463-7955

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Slovinsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/16:00093371

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18690/24637955.9.1.101-120(2016)

UT WoS

000411519200003

Klíčová slova česky

Evropská unie; Volný pohyb služeb; Zdravotní turistika; Práva pacientů; Veřejné financování zdravotní péče

Klíčová slova anglicky

European Union; Free movement of services; Medical Tourism; Patients' Rights; Public financing of healthcare

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 15. 7. 2020 15:16, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

ORIG CZ

V originále

Czechia, Poland and Slovakia are neighbour countries with similar history and socioeconomic conditions. They share heritage of socialized healthcare. Nevertheless, they adopted different policies towards promotion of patient mobility in the European Union. Accession to coordination of social security establishing assistance for tourists was smooth. Providers offer quality care for good prices. Foreign patients come to all three countries. Right for reimbursement of treatment intentionally sought across borders was created by the Court of Justice already before their accession. Nevertheless, they already decided on the Patients' Directive. Czechia supported it, Slovakia abstained and Poland refused. Numerous Poles seek treatment abroad and ask for its reimbursement, while implementing legislation barely complies and authorities are tight-fisted. Few Slovaks do it in accordance with rules adopted with cautiousness. Czechs ignore this opportunity despite official benevolence. Quality of healthcare, various pricesetting and peculiarities of public financing explain this difference.

Česky

Časopisecký článek zkoumá ve vazbě na dosavadní akademickou reflexi mobility pacientů odlišné přístupy v Česku, Slovensku a Polsku jako třech sousedních postsocialistických státech k podpoře mobility pacientů prostřednictvím tzv. pacientské směrnice. Odlišné přístupy a využívání lze připsat různé úrovni zdravotní péče, jejímu oceňování a odlišnostem při veřejném financování.

Přiložené soubory

2016-Krepelka-Different_Approaches_towards_Patients_Mobility_in_the_European_Union_in_Czechia__Slovakia_and_Poland.pdf Verze souboru

Citovat

KŘEPELKA, Filip. Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland. Medicine, Law & Society. Maribor: University of Maribor Press, 2016, roč. 9, č. 2, s. 101-120. ISSN 2463-7955. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.18690/24637955.9.1.101-120(2016).

@article{1371220,
   author = {Křepelka, Filip},
   article_location = {Maribor},
   article_number = {2},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.18690/24637955.9.1.101-120(2016)},
   keywords = {European Union; Free movement of services; Medical Tourism; Patients' Rights; Public financing of healthcare},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2463-7955},
   journal = {Medicine, Law & Society},
   title = {Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland},
   url = {http://journals.um.si/index.php/medicine/article/view/28/23},
   volume = {9},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1371220
AU  - Křepelka, Filip
PY  - 2016
TI  - Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland
JF  - Medicine, Law & Society
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
SP  - 101-120
EP  - 101-120
PB  - University of Maribor Press
SN  - 24637955
KW  - European Union
KW  - Free movement of services
KW  - Medical Tourism
KW  - Patients' Rights
KW  - Public financing of healthcare
UR  - http://journals.um.si/index.php/medicine/article/view/28/23
L2  - http://journals.um.si/index.php/medicine/article/view/28/23
N2  - Czechia, Poland and Slovakia are neighbour countries with similar history and socioeconomic conditions. They share heritage of socialized healthcare. Nevertheless, they adopted different policies towards promotion of patient mobility in the European Union. Accession to coordination of social security establishing assistance for tourists was smooth. Providers offer quality care for good prices. Foreign patients come to all three countries. Right for reimbursement of treatment intentionally sought across borders was created by the Court of Justice already before their accession. Nevertheless, they already decided on the Patients' Directive. Czechia supported it, Slovakia abstained and Poland refused. Numerous Poles seek treatment abroad and ask for its reimbursement, while implementing legislation barely complies and authorities are tight-fisted. Few Slovaks do it in accordance with rules adopted with cautiousness. Czechs ignore this opportunity despite official benevolence. Quality of healthcare, various pricesetting and peculiarities of public financing explain this difference.
ER  -

KŘEPELKA, Filip. Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland. \textit{Medicine, Law \&{} Society}. Maribor: University of Maribor Press, 2016, roč.~9, č.~2, s.~101-120. ISSN~2463-7955. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.18690/24637955.9.1.101-120(2016).

Přehled o publikaci