Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a
historiographical myth (1880–1930)

M 2017

Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930)

FOLETTI, Ivan a Francesco LOVINO

Základní údaje

Originální název

Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930)

Autoři

FOLETTI, Ivan a Francesco LOVINO

Vydání

2017

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Uspořádání konference

Obor

60401 Arts, Art history

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/17:00096133

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Orient oder Rom; Historiography; Strzygowski; Orientalism

Štítky

rivok

Změněno: 2. 4. 2018 18:13, doc. Mgr. Pavel Suchánek, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Today the question “Orient oder Rom?” is no longer a topical issue in medieval art history, although a persuasive answer has never been formulated. One of the reasons for this oblivion deals with the controversial figure of Josef Strzygowski, who in 1901 published about the question his pivotal volume and nowadays discredited for its racial and proto-nazi judgement. However, the question “Orient oder Rom?” concerns not only with Josef Strzygowski: the prodromes of this critical concepts goes back to the nineteenth century, when the Russian, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires fought to control contested territories, and humanities studies mirrored these conflicts. The conference aims to distance from the sole Strzygowski’s perspective and to comprehend and rewrite the story of a pivotal concept for both art historiography and cultural identity. The goal of such reflection deals with three different moments: (I) the prehistory of the question “Orient oder Rom?” according to the nineteenth-century studies in the Russian, Austro-Hungarian and even in the Ottoman empires, where art history coincided with political aspiration; (II) the Vienna experience and the dialectical clash between Alois Riegl’s and Franz Wickhoff’s school against Josef Strzygowski, and its repercussions worldwide; (III) the longue duree or how the lumbering figure of Strzygowski determined the critical misfortune of the question during the 1920s and the 1930s, until the postwar period.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1090/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Místo a okamžik formy v dějinách evropské architektury a výtvarného umění (Akronym: Místo a okamžik formy)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Místo a okamžik formy v dějinách evropské architektury a výtvarného umění, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

FOLETTI, Ivan a Francesco LOVINO. Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930). 2017.

@proceedings{1372000,
   author = {Foletti, Ivan and Lovino, Francesco},
   keywords = {Orient oder Rom; Historiography; Strzygowski; Orientalism},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930)},
   url = {http://www.udu.cas.cz/cs/archiv-clanku/orient-oder-rom/},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1372000
AU  - Foletti, Ivan - Lovino, Francesco
PY  - 2017
TI  - Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930)
KW  - Orient oder Rom
KW  - Historiography
KW  - Strzygowski
KW  - Orientalism
UR  - http://www.udu.cas.cz/cs/archiv-clanku/orient-oder-rom/
N2  - Today the question “Orient oder Rom?” is no longer a topical issue in medieval art history, although a persuasive answer has never been formulated. One of the reasons for this oblivion deals with the controversial figure of Josef Strzygowski, who in 1901 published about the question his pivotal volume and nowadays discredited for its racial and proto-nazi judgement. However, the question “Orient oder Rom?” concerns not only with Josef Strzygowski: the prodromes of this critical concepts goes back to the nineteenth century, when the Russian, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires fought to control contested territories, and humanities studies mirrored these conflicts. The conference aims to distance from the sole Strzygowski’s perspective and to comprehend and rewrite the story of a pivotal concept for both art historiography and cultural identity. The goal of such reflection deals with three different moments: (I) the prehistory of the question “Orient oder Rom?” according to the nineteenth-century studies in the Russian, Austro-Hungarian and even in the Ottoman empires, where art history coincided with political aspiration; (II) the Vienna experience and the dialectical clash between Alois Riegl’s and Franz Wickhoff’s school against Josef Strzygowski, and its repercussions worldwide; (III) the longue duree or how the lumbering figure of Strzygowski determined the critical misfortune of the question during the 1920s and the 1930s, until the postwar period.
ER  -

FOLETTI, Ivan a Francesco LOVINO. \textit{Orient oder Rom? Prehistory, history and reception of a historiographical myth (1880–1930)}. 2017.

Přehled o publikaci