Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the
ecosystem services approach

J 2016

Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach

VERMAAT, Jan E.; Alfred J. WAGTENDONK; Roy BROUWER; Oleg SHEREMET; Erik ANSINK et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach

Autoři

Vydání

Hydrobiologia, DORDRECHT, Springer, 2016, 0018-8158

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10000 1. Natural Sciences

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.056

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/16:00093506

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Nutrient retention; River corridor; Wetlands; Flood control; Biodiversity; Economic valuation

Štítky

AKR, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 3. 2017 07:44, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The success of river restoration was estimated using the ecosystem services approach. In eight pairs of restored-unrestored reaches and floodplains across Europe, we quantified provisioning (agricultural products, wood, reed for thatching, infiltrated drinking water), regulating (flooding and drainage, nutrient retention, carbon sequestration) and cultural (recreational hunting and fishing, kayaking, biodiversity conservation, appreciation of scenic landscapes) services for separate habitats within each reach, and summed these to annual economic value normalized per reach area. We used locally available data and literature, did surveys among inhabitants and visitors, and used a range of economic methods (market value, shadow price, replacement cost, avoided damage, willingness-to-pay survey, choice experiment) to provide final monetary service estimates. Total ecosystem service value was significantly increased in the restored reaches (difference 1400 +/- A 600 a,not signA ha(-1) year(-1); 2500 - 1100, p = 0.03, paired t test). Removal of one extreme case did not affect this outcome. We analysed the relation between services delivered and with floodplain and catchment characteristics after reducing these 23 variables to four principal components explaining 80% of the variance. Cultural and regulating services correlated positively with human population density, cattle density and agricultural N surplus in the catchment, but not with the fraction of arable land or forest, floodplain slope, mean river discharge or GDP. Our interpretation is that landscape appreciation and flood risk alleviation are a function of human population density, but not wealth, in areas where dairy farming is the prime form of agriculture.

Návaznosti

7E12071, projekt VaV

Název: Restoring rivers for effective catchment management (Akronym: REFORM)

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Restoring rivers for effective catchment management - REFORM

Citovat

VERMAAT, Jan E.; Alfred J. WAGTENDONK; Roy BROUWER; Oleg SHEREMET; Erik ANSINK; Tim BROCKHOFF; Maarten PLUG; Seppo HELLSTEN; Jukka AROVIITA; Luiza TYLEC; Marek GIELCZEWSKI; Lukáš KOHÚT; Karel BRABEC; Jantine HAVERKAMP; Michaela POPPE; Kerstin BOCK; Matthijs COERSSEN; Joel SEGERSTEN a Daniel HERING. Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia. DORDRECHT: Springer, 2016, roč. 769, č. 1, s. 121-135. ISSN 0018-8158. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z.

@article{1372374,
   author = {Vermaat, Jan E. and Wagtendonk, Alfred J. and Brouwer, Roy and Sheremet, Oleg and Ansink, Erik and Brockhoff, Tim and Plug, Maarten and Hellsten, Seppo and Aroviita, Jukka and Tylec, Luiza and Gielczewski, Marek and Kohút, Lukáš and Brabec, Karel and Haverkamp, Jantine and Poppe, Michaela and Bock, Kerstin and Coerssen, Matthijs and Segersten, Joel and Hering, Daniel},
   article_location = {DORDRECHT},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z},
   keywords = {Nutrient retention; River corridor; Wetlands; Flood control; Biodiversity; Economic valuation},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0018-8158},
   journal = {Hydrobiologia},
   title = {Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach},
   url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10750-015-2482-z},
   volume = {769},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1372374
AU  - Vermaat, Jan E. - Wagtendonk, Alfred J. - Brouwer, Roy - Sheremet, Oleg - Ansink, Erik - Brockhoff, Tim - Plug, Maarten - Hellsten, Seppo - Aroviita, Jukka - Tylec, Luiza - Gielczewski, Marek - Kohút, Lukáš - Brabec, Karel - Haverkamp, Jantine - Poppe, Michaela - Bock, Kerstin - Coerssen, Matthijs - Segersten, Joel - Hering, Daniel
PY  - 2016
TI  - Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach
JF  - Hydrobiologia
VL  - 769
IS  - 1
SP  - 121-135
EP  - 121-135
PB  - Springer
SN  - 00188158
KW  - Nutrient retention
KW  - River corridor
KW  - Wetlands
KW  - Flood control
KW  - Biodiversity
KW  - Economic valuation
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10750-015-2482-z
L2  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10750-015-2482-z
N2  - The success of river restoration was estimated using the ecosystem services approach. In eight pairs of restored-unrestored reaches and floodplains across Europe, we quantified provisioning (agricultural products, wood, reed for thatching, infiltrated drinking water), regulating (flooding and drainage, nutrient retention, carbon sequestration) and cultural (recreational hunting and fishing, kayaking, biodiversity conservation, appreciation of scenic landscapes) services for separate habitats within each reach, and summed these to annual economic value normalized per reach area. We used locally available data and literature, did surveys among inhabitants and visitors, and used a range of economic methods (market value, shadow price, replacement cost, avoided damage, willingness-to-pay survey, choice experiment) to provide final monetary service estimates. Total ecosystem service value was significantly increased in the restored reaches (difference 1400 +/- A 600 a,not signA ha(-1) year(-1); 2500 - 1100, p = 0.03, paired t test). Removal of one extreme case did not affect this outcome. We analysed the relation between services delivered and with floodplain and catchment characteristics after reducing these 23 variables to four principal components explaining 80% of the variance. Cultural and regulating services correlated positively with human population density, cattle density and agricultural N surplus in the catchment, but not with the fraction of arable land or forest, floodplain slope, mean river discharge or GDP. Our interpretation is that landscape appreciation and flood risk alleviation are a function of human population density, but not wealth, in areas where dairy farming is the prime form of agriculture.
ER  -

VERMAAT, Jan E.; Alfred J. WAGTENDONK; Roy BROUWER; Oleg SHEREMET; Erik ANSINK; Tim BROCKHOFF; Maarten PLUG; Seppo HELLSTEN; Jukka AROVIITA; Luiza TYLEC; Marek GIELCZEWSKI; Lukáš KOHÚT; Karel BRABEC; Jantine HAVERKAMP; Michaela POPPE; Kerstin BOCK; Matthijs COERSSEN; Joel SEGERSTEN a Daniel HERING. Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. \textit{Hydrobiologia}. DORDRECHT: Springer, 2016, roč.~769, č.~1, s.~121-135. ISSN~0018-8158. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z.

Přehled o publikaci