The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists
and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria

J 2017

The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš a Jan ROUBAL

Základní údaje

Originální název

The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria

Autoři

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Jan ROUBAL (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, Washingotn, DC, APA, 2017, 1053-0479

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.000 v roce 1999

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/17:00096746

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069

UT WoS

000423038800003

Klíčová slova anglicky

psychotherapy integration; eclecticism; operationalization; theoretical orientation; techniques

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 2. 2019 15:03, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1007/2015, interní kód MU

Název: Intenzivní výzkum psychoterapeutického procesu

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Intenzivní výzkum psychoterapeutického procesu, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš a Jan ROUBAL. The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. Washingotn, DC: APA, 2017, roč. 27, č. 1, s. 13-22. ISSN 1053-0479. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069.

@article{1381217,
   author = {Řiháček, Tomáš and Roubal, Jan},
   article_location = {Washingotn, DC},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069},
   keywords = {psychotherapy integration; eclecticism; operationalization; theoretical orientation; techniques},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1053-0479},
   journal = {Journal of Psychotherapy Integration},
   title = {The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria},
   volume = {27},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1381217
AU  - Řiháček, Tomáš - Roubal, Jan
PY  - 2017
TI  - The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
JF  - Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
VL  - 27
IS  - 1
SP  - 13-22
EP  - 13-22
PB  - APA
SN  - 10530479
KW  - psychotherapy integration
KW  - eclecticism
KW  - operationalization
KW  - theoretical orientation
KW  - techniques
N2  - A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.
ER  -

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš a Jan ROUBAL. The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria. \textit{Journal of Psychotherapy Integration}. Washingotn, DC: APA, 2017, roč.~27, č.~1, s.~13-22. ISSN~1053-0479. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci