Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges

J 2008

Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges

SINTOMER, Y; C HERZBERG a A ROCKE

Základní údaje

Originální název

Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges

Autoři

SINTOMER, Y; C HERZBERG a A ROCKE

Vydání

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, OXFORD, John Wiley and Sons. 2008, 0309-1317

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.299

Označené pro přenos do RIV

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x

UT WoS

000253982600009

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 19. 6. 2017 10:23, Ing. Eduard Bakoš, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The 'transfer' of participatory budgeting from Brazil to Europe has been a highly differentiated process. In Porto Alegre, this innovative methodology enabled democratization and social justice to be articulated. In Europe, participatory budgeting relies on multiple procedures, and it is therefore necessary to give a clear methodological definition of it so that cases can be coherently compared and ideal-types constructed to understand the variety of concrete experiments. The six ideal-types we propose (Porto Alegre adapted for Europe; representation of organized interests; community funds at the local and city level; the public/private negotiating table; consultation on public finances; proximity participation) show striking differences that are highly influenced by existing participatory traditions. It is, above all, with the models Porto Alegre adapted for Europe and community funds that an 'empowered participatory governance' can develop and that a fourth power, beyond the three classical ones, is developing - that of the citizenry when it directly (or through delegates) assumes a decision-making power. However, other models have their strengths, too, for example with regard to the reform of public administration which is a critical aspect in the search for 'another possible world'.

Citovat

SINTOMER, Y; C HERZBERG a A ROCKE. Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. OXFORD: John Wiley and Sons., 2008, roč. 32, č. 1, s. 164-178. ISSN 0309-1317. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x.

@article{1383494,
   author = {Sintomer, Y and Herzberg, C and Rocke, A},
   article_location = {OXFORD},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0309-1317},
   journal = {International Journal of Urban and Regional Research},
   title = {Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges},
   volume = {32},
   year = {2008}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1383494
AU  - Sintomer, Y - Herzberg, C - Rocke, A
PY  - 2008
TI  - Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges
JF  - International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
VL  - 32
IS  - 1
SP  - 164-178
EP  - 164-178
PB  - John Wiley and Sons.
SN  - 03091317
N2  - The 'transfer' of participatory budgeting from Brazil to Europe has been a highly differentiated process. In Porto Alegre, this innovative methodology enabled democratization and social justice to be articulated. In Europe, participatory budgeting relies on multiple procedures, and it is therefore necessary to give a clear methodological definition of it so that cases can be coherently compared and ideal-types constructed to understand the variety of concrete experiments. The six ideal-types we propose (Porto Alegre adapted for Europe; representation of organized interests; community funds at the local and city level; the public/private negotiating table; consultation on public finances; proximity participation) show striking differences that are highly influenced by existing participatory traditions. It is, above all, with the models Porto Alegre adapted for Europe and community funds that an 'empowered participatory governance' can develop and that a fourth power, beyond the three classical ones, is developing - that of the citizenry when it directly (or through delegates) assumes a decision-making power. However, other models have their strengths, too, for example with regard to the reform of public administration which is a critical aspect in the search for 'another possible world'.
ER  -

SINTOMER, Y; C HERZBERG a A ROCKE. Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. \textit{International Journal of Urban and Regional Research}. OXFORD: John Wiley and Sons., 2008, roč.~32, č.~1, s.~164-178. ISSN~0309-1317. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x.

Přehled o publikaci