VOBOŘIL, Dalibor, Martin JELÍNEK a Petr KVĚTON. Experimental Evaluation of Tachistoscopic Measurement: A Step Beyond Wundt's Criticism. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, CHAMPAIGN: UNIV ILLINOIS PRESS, 2014, roč. 127, č. 2, s. 245-252. ISSN 0002-9556. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.2.0245.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Experimental Evaluation of Tachistoscopic Measurement: A Step Beyond Wundt's Criticism
Autoři VOBOŘIL, Dalibor, Martin JELÍNEK a Petr KVĚTON.
Vydání AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, CHAMPAIGN, UNIV ILLINOIS PRESS, 2014, 0002-9556.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 0.619
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.2.0245
UT WoS 000336349600009
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Dana Nesnídalová, učo 831. Změněno: 5. 3. 2020 09:30.
Anotace
This study was designed to assess the possible systematic bias in measurements obtained using tachistoscopic devices from different historical periods of psychological research. Four different tachistoscopic devices were used for brief presentations of stimuli in a letter recognition task. The research sample consisted of 24 participants (12 female, 12 male) in a within-subject experimental design with complete counterbalancing of 4 conditions defined by 4 instrument types: fall tachistoscope, tachistoscope with camera-like shutter, and computer-based tachistoscopes with cathode ray tube and liquid crystal diode display screens. The effects of experimental conditions were examined using a linear mixed model analysis. Our experiment demonstrated that even in standardized settings the type of tachistoscope used for stimulus presentation systematically influenced the participants' performance. We found that the lowest number of correctly recalled stimuli, as well as the highest number of erroneously recalled stimuli, was produced in the camera-like tachistoscope condition. Together, these findings suggest that when results from studies involving tachistoscopic experiments are reviewed, the unique characteristics of each particular instrument used must be considered carefully.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 30. 10. 2020 04:06