J 2017

Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I

BOEDDINGHAUS, J.; T. NESTELBERGER; R. TWERENBOLD; K. WILDI; P. BADERTSCHER et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I

Autoři

BOEDDINGHAUS, J.; T. NESTELBERGER; R. TWERENBOLD; K. WILDI; P. BADERTSCHER; J. CUPA; T. BURGE; P. MACHLER; S. CORBIERE; K. GRIMM; M.R. GIMENEZ; C. PUELACHER; S. SHRESTHA; D.F. WIDMER; J. FUHRMANN; P. HILLINGER; Z. SABTI; U. HONEGGER; N. SCHAERLI; N. KOZHUHAROV; K. RENTSCH; O. MIRO; B. LOPEZ; F.J. MARTIN-SANCHEZ; E. RODRIGUEZ-ADRADA; B. MORAWIEC; D. KAWECKI; Eva GANOVSKÁ; Jiří PAŘENICA; J. LOHRMANN; W. KLOOS; A. BUSER; N. GEIGY; D.I. KELLER; S. OSSWALD; T. REICHLIN a C. MUELLER

Vydání

Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2017, 0009-7322

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 18.881

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00097703

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

diagnosis; myocardial infarction; rule-out strategies

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 21. 3. 2018 16:03, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

BACKGROUND: Four strategies for very early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) have been identified. It remains unclear which strategy is most attractive for clinical application. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Hs-cTnI levels were measured at presentation and after 1 hour in a blinded fashion. We directly compared all 4 hs-cTnI-based rule-out strategies: limit of detection (LOD, hs-cTnI<2 ng/L), single cutoff (hs-cTnI<5 ng/L), 1-hour algorithm (hs-cTnI<5 ng/L and 1-hour change<2 ng/L), and the 0/1-hour algorithm recommended in the European Society of Cardiology guideline combining LOD and 1-hour algorithm. RESULTS: Among 2828 enrolled patients, acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 451 (16%) patients. The LOD approach ruled out 453 patients (16%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.2%-100%), the single cutoff 1516 patients (54%) with a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI, 95.1%-98.3%), the 1-hour algorithm 1459 patients (52%) with a sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.2%), and the 0/1-hour algorithm 1463 patients (52%) with a sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.2%). Predefined subgroup analysis in early presenters (<= 2 hours) revealed significantly lower sensitivity (94.2%, interaction P=0.03) of the single cutoff, but not the other strategies. Two-year survival was 100% with LOD and 98.1% with the other strategies (P<0.01 for LOD versus each of the other strategies). CONCLUSIONS: All 4 rule-out strategies balance effectiveness and safety equally well. The single cutoff should not be applied in early presenters, whereas the 3 other strategies seem to perform well in this challenging subgroup.